On the Nature of Intelligence

Science or Bias?
  • Michael Lewis

Abstract

The concept of intelligence—subsuming the belief that intelligence is relatively easy to measure and that, as a monolithic construct, it is a useful predictor of subsequent human behavior—is firmly entrenched in the mind of Western man.

Keywords

School Performance Mental Activity Intelligence Test Mental Ability Intellectual Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, S., and Messick, S. Social competency in young children. Developmental Psychology, 1974, 10, 282–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayley, N. On the growth of intelligence. American Psychologist, 1955, 10, 805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bayley, N. Bayley scales of infant development: Birth to two years. New York: Psychological Corp., 1969.Google Scholar
  4. Bayley, N. Development of mental abilities. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology. New York: Wiley, 1970.Google Scholar
  5. Berg, I. Education and jobs: The great training robbery. New York: Praeger, 1970.Google Scholar
  6. Berliner, D. C., and Cahen, L. S. Trait-treatment interactions and learning. In L. Kerlinger (Ed.), Review of research in education. Itasca: Peacock, 1973.Google Scholar
  7. Binet, A. Historique des recherches sur les rapports de l’intelligence avec la grandeur et la forme de la tête. L’Année Psychologique, 1898, 4, 245–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Binet, A. Recherches sur la technique de la mensuration de la tête vivante. L’Année Psychologique, 1900, 5, 314–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burt, C. The factors of the mind. London: University of London Press, 1940.Google Scholar
  10. Burt, C., Jones, E., Miller, E., and Moodie, W. How the mind works. New York: AppletonCentury-Crofts, 1934.Google Scholar
  11. Corman, H. H., and Escalona, S. K. Stages of sensorimotor development: A replication study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1969, 15, 351.Google Scholar
  12. Cronbach, L. J. Five decades of public controversy over mental testing. American Psychologist,1975, 30, 1Google Scholar
  13. Duncan, O. D., Featherman, D. L., and Duncan, B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  14. Elton, C. F., and Shevell, L. R. Who is talented? An analysis of achievement (Research report No. 31 ). Iowa City, Ia.: American College Testing Program, 1969.Google Scholar
  15. Galton, F. Hereditary genius. New York: D. Appleton, 1884.Google Scholar
  16. Ghiselli, E. E. The validity of occupational aptitude tests. New York: Wiley, 1966Google Scholar
  17. Goddard, H. H. The Kallikak family: A study in the heredity of feeble-mindedness. New York: Macmillan, 1912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gould, S. J. The mismeasurement of man. New York: W. W. Norton, 1981.Google Scholar
  19. Guilford, J. P. Three faces of intellect. American Psychologist, 1959, 14, 469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hearnshaw, L. S. Cyril Burt psychologist. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1979Google Scholar
  21. Holland, J. L., and Richards, J. M., JR. Academic and nonacademic accomplishment: Correlated or uncorrelated? (Research Report No. 2 ). Iowa City, Ia.: American College Testing Program, 1965.Google Scholar
  22. Jencks, C., Smith, M., Acland, H., Bane, M. J., Cohen, D., Gintis, H., Heyns, B., and Michalson, S. Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in America. New York: Harper and Row, 1972.Google Scholar
  23. Jensen, A. R. The heritability of intelligence. Saturday Evening Post, 1972, 244, 9, 12, 149Google Scholar
  24. Kamin, L. F. The science and politics of IQ. New York: Halsted Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  25. King, W., and Seegmiller, B. Cognitive development from 14 to 22 months of age in black, male, first-born infants assessed by the Bayley and Hunt–U2giris scales. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development meetings, Minneapolis, 1971.Google Scholar
  26. Kohlberg, L., Lacrosse, J., and Ricks, D. The predictability of adult mental health from childhood behavior. In B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of child psychopathology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.Google Scholar
  27. Lamb, M. E., and Sherrod, L. R. (Eds.). Infant social cognition: Empirical and theoretical considerations. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum, 1981.Google Scholar
  28. Lewis, M., and Brooks, J. Infants’ social perception: A constructivist view. In L. Cohen and P. Salapatek (Eds.), Infant perception: From sensation to cognition. New York: Academic Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  29. Lewis, M., and Brooks-Gunn, J. Social cognition and the acquisition of self. New York: Plenum Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  30. Lewis, M., and Brooks-Gunn, J. Visual attention at three months as a predictor of cognitive functioning at two years of age. Intelligence, 1981, 5, 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lewis, M., and Enright, M. K. The development of mental abilities: A multidimensional model of intelligence in infancy. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1982.Google Scholar
  32. Lewis, M., and Lee-Painter, S. Mother-infant interaction and cognitive development. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Philadelphia, 1974Google Scholar
  33. Lewis, M., and Mcgurk, H. The evaluation of infant intelligence: Infant intelligence scores—true or false? Science, 1972, 178 (4066), 1174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lewis, M., and Michalson, L. Children’s emotions and moods: Developmental Theory and measurement. New York: Plenum Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lewis, M., and Rosenblum, L. (Eds.). The origins of behavior (Vol. 2). The origins of fear. New York: Wiley, 1974.Google Scholar
  36. Lewis, M., and Rosenblum, L. The origins of behavior (Vol. 5). Interaction, conversation, and the development of language. New York: Wiley, 1977.Google Scholar
  37. Mccall, R. B., Hogarty, P. S., and Hirlburt, N. Transitions in infant sensorimotor development and the prediction of childhood IQ. American Psychologist, 1972, 27, 728.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCall, R. B., Eichorn, D. H., and Hogarty, P. S. Transitions in early mental development. Monographs of the Society of Research in Child Development,1977, 42 (3, Serial No. 171).Google Scholar
  39. Mcclelland, D. C. Testing for competence rather than for “intelligence.” American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 1–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Morton, S. Observations on the size of the brain in various races and families of man. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Science, 1849, 4, 221–224.Google Scholar
  41. Nuttall, R. L., and Fozard, T. L. Age, socioeconomic status and human abilities. Aging and Human Development, 1970, 1, 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Overton, W. On the assumptive base of the nature-nurture controversy: Additive versus interactive conceptions. Human Development, 1973, 16, 74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Richards, T. W., and Nelson, V. L. Abilities of infants during the first eighteen months. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1939, 55, 299–318.Google Scholar
  44. Scarr, S. Testing for children. American Psychologist, 1981, 36, 1159–1166. Scarr-Salapatek, S. Race, social class and IQ. Science, 1971, 174, 1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Siegel, L. S. Infant tests as predictors of cognitive and language development at two years. Child Development, 1981, 52, 545–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Spearman, C. General intelligence objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 1904, 15, 201–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stott, L. H., and Ball, R. S. Infant and preschool mental tests: Review and evaluation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development,1965, 30 (Serial No. 101).Google Scholar
  48. Taylor, C., Smith, W. R., and Chiselin, B. The creative and other contributions of one sample of research scientists. In C. W. Taylor and F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development. New York: Wiley, 1963.Google Scholar
  49. Terman, L. M. Genius and stupidity. A study of some of the intellectual processes of seven “bright” and seven “stupid” boys. Pedagogical Seminary, 1906, 13, 307–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thomas, H. Psychological assessment instruments for use with human infants, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1970, 16, 179.Google Scholar
  51. Thorndike, R. L., and Hagen, E. 10,000 careers. New York: Wiley, 1959.Google Scholar
  52. Thurstone, L. L. Primary mental abilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1938.Google Scholar
  53. Ugiris, I. C. Patterns of cognitive development in infancy. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1973, 19, 181.Google Scholar
  54. Ugiris, I. C., and HuNT, J. McV. Assessment in infancy: Ordinal scales of development. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois, Urbana, Ill.: 1975.Google Scholar
  55. Wilson, R. S. Testing infant intelligence. Science, 1973, 182, 734–737.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zigler, E., and Trickett, P. K. IQ, social competence, and evaluation of early childhood intervention programs. American Psychologist, 1978, 33, 789–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Lewis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Medical SchoolUniversity of Medicine and Dentistry of New JerseyNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations