The Integration of Systemic and Scientific Thinking in the Development of an Innovative Process for Environmental Management

  • James Frederickson
  • Norah Frederickson

Abstract

The growing debate on issues such as maintaining biological diversity and escalating environmental degradation have highlighted the need for systemic approaches to environmental management. For example, Ulrich (1993) proposes the concept of critical holism as being useful in the debate about designs or applications in the field of ecological thinking. Here, critical systems heuristics has been used to develop a number of boundary judgements which can be used to address the value, power and knowledge bases of particular designs, as well as their basis of legitimisation. Grumbine (1994) has argued that the concept of ecosystem management is an approach which offers a fundamental reframing of how humans work with nature because it ‘integrates scientific knowledge of ecological relationships within a complex sociopolitical and values framework toward the general goal of protecting native ecosystem integrity over the long term’. A number of themes underlie the concept such as the need for environmental managers to seek connections between all levels of the biodiversity hierarchy, to work across ecological and administrative boundaries and to conserve viable populations which also includes the reintroduction of species. Importantly he identifies adaptive management, where management is considered to be a learning process, as a theme and highlights the dominant role that human values play in ecosystem management goals.

Keywords

Problem Situation Product Concept Soft System Methodology Restoration Worker Apply System Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Butt, K. R., Frederickson, J. and Morris, R. M., 1995, An earthworm cultivation and soil-inoculation technique for land restoration, Ecological Engineering 4:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Checkland, P. B. and Scholes, J., 1990, Soft Systems Methodology in Action, Wiley: London.Google Scholar
  3. Checkland, P. B., 1981, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Wiley: London.Google Scholar
  4. Checkland, P. B., 1995, Model validation in systems practice. Systems Research 12(1):47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Curry, J. P., 1988, The ecology of earthworms in reclaimed soils and their influence on soil fertility, in: Earthworms in Waste and Environmental Management (C. A. Edwards and E. F. Neuhauser, eds), pp. 251–261, SPB Academic, The Hauge.Google Scholar
  6. Frederickson, N., 1990a, Systems approaches in educational psychology, Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 17:3–20.Google Scholar
  7. Frederickson, N. (ed.), 1990b, Soft Systems Methodology: Practical Applications in Work with Schools, Educational Psychology Publishing, London.Google Scholar
  8. Grumbine, E. R., 1994, What is Ecosystem Management? Conservation biology 8(1):27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Henry, N., Massey, D. and Wield, D., 1995, Along the road: R&D, society and space, Research Policy 24:707–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Howell, S., 1991, Methodology on paper and methodology in use: New expositions of soft systems methodology, Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 18:87–90.Google Scholar
  11. Kotier, P., 1984, Marketing Management: analysis, planning and control, Prentice-Hall International: inc., London.Google Scholar
  12. Ulrich, W., 1993, Some difficulties of ecological thinking, considered from a critical systems perspective: a plea for critical holism, Systems Practice 6:583–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Frederickson
    • 1
  • Norah Frederickson
    • 2
  1. 1.Systems DepartmentOpen UniversityMilton KeynesEngland
  2. 2.Psychology DepartmentUniversity CollegeLondonEngland

Personalised recommendations