Cost Estimation, Profit Appraisal, Process Modeling, and Optimization

  • F. Goodridge
  • K. Scott

Abstract

The process modeling and optimization procedures of this chapter require a knowledge of capital investment and operating costs of chemical plant, as well as methods of appraisal of profitability. To find optimum design parameters of a plant, a process model has to be set up so that capital and running costs as a function of the variables under consideration such as conversion, current density, and product purity can be determined The duty or throughput of the plant is based on a market survey and is usually fixed. Plotting process capital costs against process running costs leads to the “payback” time, how many years it will take for the production cost savings to recover the extra investment incurred for equipment. Profitability is then assessed, usually in terms of i,the discounted cash flow rate of return (DCFRR), which is related to payback time. The company decides whether i is acceptable or if another process must be looked at. Unfortunately, an optimized plant design does not guarantee profitability.

Keywords

Heat Exchanger Production Cost Oxalic Acid Capital Investment Cost Estimation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A New Guide to Capital Cost Estimating,“ 1977, Instit. Chem. Eng. and Assoc. Cost Eng.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bauman, H. C., 1964, Fundamentals of Cost Engineering in the Chemical Industry, Reinhold Publishing, Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Peters, M. S. and Timmerhaus, K. D., 1980, Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 3d ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Backhurst, J. R. and Harker, J. H., 1983, Process Plant Design,Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coulson, J. M. and Richardson, J. F., 1990, Chemical Engineering,4th ed., vol. 6, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Plimley, R. E., 1980, “Interactions between an electrochemical reactor and associated unit processes,” J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol., 30: 233–243.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sawistowski, H. and Smith, W., 1963, Mass Transfer Process Calculations, Interscience Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coulson and Richardson, 1978, 3d ed. vol. 2, p. 471.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rose, L. M., 1974, The Application of Mathematical Modelling to Process Development and Design, Applied Science Publications Ltd., London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Goodridge
    • 1
  • K. Scott
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Newcastle upon TyneNewcastle upon TyneEngland

Personalised recommendations