Heterochronic Approaches to the Study of Locomotion

  • Laurie R. Godfrey
  • Stephen J. King
  • Michael R. Sutherland

Abstract

Despite the advances that have been made in documenting ontogenetic changes in primate skeletal morphology, relatively little is known about the ontogeny of locomotor behavior. Even less is known about differences among behavioral developmental trajectories of closely related species. The study of evolutionary changes in developmental trajectories is the purview of heterochrony. Heterochrony is generally defined as the study of perturbations and displacements in existing ontogenetic pathways caused by changes in developmental timing and rates. As such, it has been conceived by some researchers (e.g., Gould, 1977; Raff et al., 1990; Zelditch and Fink, 1996; Rice, 1997) as narrowly encompassing only a subset of possible evolutionary shifts in ontogeny, and by others (e.g., McKinney and McNamara, 1991) as all-inclusive. The goal of heterochrony is to understand the proximate causes of differences among adult phenotypes of closely related species. This entails understanding how, through development, morphology and behavior emerge, and how developmental trajectories themselves evolve. Applied to the study of locomotion, it means understanding the evolutionary basis for variation, if any, in the ontogeny of positional behavior, and its relation to the ontogeny of form.

Keywords

Shape Space Positive Allometry Negative Allometry Simple Power Function Allometric Trajectory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alberch P, Gould SJ, Oster GF, and Wake DB (1979) Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology 5:296–317.Google Scholar
  2. Cartmill M (1974) Pads and claws in arboreal locomotion. In FA Jenkins (ed.): Primate Locomotion. New York: Academic Press, pp. 45–83.Google Scholar
  3. Cheverud J (1982) Relationships among ontogenetic, static, and evolutionary allometry. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 59:139–149.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clutton-Brock TH, and Harvey PH (1979) Comparison and adaptation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 205:547–565.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coppinger L, and Coppinger R (1982) Livestock-quarding dogs that wear sheep’s clothing. Smithsonian 13:65–73.Google Scholar
  6. Coppinger R, Glendinning J, Matthay C, Smith C, Sutherland M, and Torop E (1987) Degree of behavioral neoteny differentiating canid polymorphs. Ethology 75:89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Demes B, and Gunther MM (1989) Biomechanics and allometric scaling in primate locomotion and morphology. Folia Primatol. 53:125–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doran DM (1992) The ontogeny of chimpanzee and pygmy chimpanzee locomotor behavior: A case study of paedomorphism and its behavioral correlates. J. Hum. Evol. 23:139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Falsetti AB, and Cole TM III (1992) Relative growth of the postcranial skeleton in callitrichines. J. Hum. Evol. 23:79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feduccia A (1980) The Age of Birds. Cambridge, Ma.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Godfrey LR, and Sutherland MR (1995a) Flawed inference: Why size-based tests of heterochronic process do not work. J. Theor. Biol. 172:43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Godfrey LR, and Sutherland MR (1995b) What’s growth got to do with it? Process and product in the evolution of ontogeny. J. Hum. Evol. 29:405–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Godfrey LR, and Sutherland MR (1996) Paradox of peramorphic paedomorphosis: Heterochrony and human evolution. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 99:17–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gomez AM (1992) Primitive and derived patterns of relative growth among species of Lorisidae. J. Hum. Evol. 23:219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gould SJ (1966) Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol. Rev. 41: 587–640.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gould SJ (1975a) Allometry in primates, with emphasis on scaling and the evolution of the brain. In FS Szalay (ed.): Approaches to Primate Paleobiology. Karger: Basel. Contr. Primatol. 5:244-292.Google Scholar
  17. Gould SJ (1975b) On the scaling of tooth size in mammals. Am. Zool. 15:351–362.Google Scholar
  18. Gould SJ (1977) Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge, Ma.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hafner JC, and Hafner MS (1988) Heterochrony in rodents. In ML McKinney (ed.): Heterochrony in Evolution: A Multidisciplinary Approach. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 217–235.Google Scholar
  20. Huxley JS (1932) Problems of Relative Growth. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
  21. Inouye SE (1992) Ontogeny and allometry of African ape manual rays. J. Hum. Evol. 23:107–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jungers WL (1984) Aspects of size and scaling in primate biology with special reference to the locomotor skeleton. Yrbk. Phys. Anthropol. 27:73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jungers WL, and Cole MS (1992) Relative growth and shape of the locomotor skeleton in lesser apes. J. Hum. Evol. 23:93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jungers WL, and Fleagle JG (1980) Postnatal growth allometry of the extremities in Cebus albifrons and Cebus apella: A longitudinal and comparative study. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 53:471–478.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jungers WL, and Hartman SE (1988) Relative growth of the locomotor skeleton in orang-utans and other large-bodied hominoids. In JH Schwartz (ed.): Orang-utan Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 347–359.Google Scholar
  26. Klingenberg CP, and Spence JR (1993) Heterochrony and allometry: Lessons from the water strider genus Limnoporus. Evol. 47:1834–1853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lande R (1979) Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution applied to brain:body size allometry. Evol. 33:402–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lande R (1982) A quantitative genetic theory of life history evolution. Ecology 63:607–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lande R (1985) Genetic and evolutionary aspects of allometry. In WL Jungers (ed.): Size and Scaling in Primate Biology. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 21–32.Google Scholar
  30. Lawton MF, and Lawton RO (1986) Heterochrony, deferred breeding, and avian sociality. In RF Johnston (ed.): Current Ornithology, Volume 3. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 187–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Livezey BC (1995) Heterochrony and avian flightlessness. In KJ McNamara (ed.): Evolutionary Change and Heterochrony. New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 169–193.Google Scholar
  32. McDonald MA, and Smith MH (1994) Behavioral and morphological correlates of heterochrony in Hispaniolan palm-tanagers. The Condor 96:433–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McKinney ML (1986) Ecological causation of heterochrony: A test and implications for evolutionary theory. Paleobiology 12:282–289.Google Scholar
  34. McKinney ML (1988) Classifying heterochrony: Allometry, size, and time. In ML McKinney (ed.): Heterochrony in Evolution, A Multidisciplinary Approach. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 17–34.Google Scholar
  35. McKinney ML, and McNamara KJ (1991) Heterochrony: The Evolution of Ontogeny. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McNamara KJ (1983) Progenesis in trilobites. In DEG Briggs and PD Lane (eds.): Trilobites and Other Early Arthropoda: Papers in Honour of Professor H. B. Whittington, FRS. Special Papers in Paleontology 30. London: Paleontological Association, pp. 59–68.Google Scholar
  37. Olson SL (1973) Evolution of the rails of the South Atlantic islands (Aves: Rallidae). Smithson. Contr. Zool. 152:1–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pilbeam DR, and Gould SJ (1974) Size and scaling in human evolution. Science 186: 892–901.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Raff RA, Parr BA, Parks AL, and Wray GA (1990) Heterochrony and other mechanisms of radical evolutionary change in early development. In MH Nitecki (ed.): Evolutionary Innovations. Chicago: University of Chicago, pp. 71–98.Google Scholar
  40. Ravosa MJ (1992) Allometry and heterochrony in extant and extinct Malagasy primates. J. Hum. Evol. 23:197–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ravosa MJ, Meyers DM, and Glander KE (1993) Relative growth of the limbs and trunk in sifakas: Heterochronic, ecological and functional considerations. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 92:499–520.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rice SH (1997) The analysis of ontogenetic trajectories: When a change in size or shape is not heterochrony. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:907–912.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shea BT (1981) Relative growth of the limbs and trunk in the African apes. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 56:179–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shea BT (1983) Allometry and heterochrony in the African apes. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 62:275–289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shea BT (1985) Bivariate and multivariate growth allometry: Statistical and biological considerations. J. Zool., Lond. 206:267–290.Google Scholar
  46. Shea BT (1986) Scapula form and locomotion in chimpanzee evolution. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 70:475–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shea BT (1988) Heterochrony in primates. In ML McKinney (ed.): Heterochrony in Evolution. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 237–266.Google Scholar
  48. Shea BT (1989) Heterochrony in human evolution: The case for neoteny reconsidered. Yrbk. Phys. Anthropol. 32:69–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shea BT (1992) Ontogenetic scaling of skeletal proportions in the talapoin monkey. J. Hum. Evol. 23:283–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shea BT, Hammer RE, and Brinster RL (1987) Growth allometry of the organs in giant transgenic mice. Endocrin. 121:1924–1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shea BT, Hammer RE, Brinster RL, and Ravosa MJ (1990) Relative growth of the skull and postcranium in giant transgenic mice. Genet. Res. Camb. 56:21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith RJ (1980) Rethinking allometry. J. Theor. Biol. 87:97–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith RJ, and Jungers WL (1997) Body mass in comparative primatology. J. Hum. Evol. 32:523–559.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Strasser E (1992) Hindlimb proportions, allometry, and biomechanics in old world monkeys (Primates, Cercopithecidae). Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 87:187–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sutherland MR, and Godfrey LR (in prep.) A multivariate matrix model for heterochronic analysis.Google Scholar
  56. Taylor AB (1995) Effects of ontogeny and sexual dimorphism on scapula morphology in the mountain gorilla (Gorilla gorilla beringei). Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 98:431–445.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Taylor AB (1997) Relative growth, ontogeny, and sexual dimorphism in Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla and G. g. beringei): Evolutionary and ecological considerations. Am. J. Primatol. 43:1–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vrba ES, Vainys JR, Gatesy JE, De Salle R, and Wei K-Y (1994) Analysis of paedomorphosis using allometric characters: The example of the Reduncini antelopes. Syst. Biol. 43:92–116.Google Scholar
  59. Zelditch ML, and Fink WL (1996) Heterochrony and heterotopy: Stability and innovation in the evolution of form. Paleobiology 22:241–254.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laurie R. Godfrey
    • 1
  • Stephen J. King
    • 1
  • Michael R. Sutherland
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUSA
  2. 2.Statistical Consulting CenterUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations