Is Justice Finite? The Case of Environmental Inclusion

  • Susan Opotow
Part of the Critical Issues in Social Justice book series (CISJ)

Abstract

Over the past 25 years, the environmental movement has argued for an increasingly wider consideration in our thinking about the natural world. It has argued, first, that a broader constituency is entitled to natural resources and, second, that a broader range of societal arrangements affect the natural world. Both inclusionary trends offer the opportunity to examine the social and psychological factors that widen a society’s “scope of justice,” the psychological boundary for extending considerations of fairness toward others. Tracing successively broader ecophilosophies over the past quarter century and describing typologies of values and research on the scope of justice, this chapter examines social psychological factors that can widen and constrict the scope of justice. Looking at this increasingly inclusionary environmental trend raises the question, “Does inclusion have limits?” The next section describes the scope of justice and its relevance to environmental attitudes and behavior.

Keywords

Natural World Environmental Ethic Environmental Justice Moral Community Environmental Movement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Archer, D. (1985). Social deviance. In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 743–804 ). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  2. Axelrod, L. J. (1994). Balancing personal needs with environmental preservation: Identifying the values that guide decisions in ecological dilemmas. Journal of Social Issues, 50 (2), 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Bookchin, M. (1982). The ecology of freedom: The emergence and dissolution of hierarchy. Palo Alto: Cheshire Books.Google Scholar
  5. Brooke, J. (1985). Fight in a Hartford suburb: Residents vs. rattlesnakes. The New York Times, B1, B2.Google Scholar
  6. Bullard, R. D. (1994). Dumping in Dixie: Race, class, and environmental quality ( 2nd ed. ). Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  7. Calabresi, G. and Bobbitt, P. (1978). Tragic choices. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  8. Callicott, J. B. and Ames, R. T. (1989). Nature in Asian traditions and thought. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  9. Clayton, S. (1994). Appeals to justice in the environmental debate. Journal of Social Issues, 50 (2), 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clayton, S. and Opotow, S. (Eds.). (1994). Green justice: Conceptions of fairness and the natural world [Special issue]. Journal of Social Issues, 50(2).Google Scholar
  11. Commission for Racial Justice. (1987). Toxic wastes and race: A national report on the racial and socioeconomic characteristics of communities with hazardous waste sites. New York: United Church of Christ.Google Scholar
  12. Cooter, R. (1987). Justice at the confluence of law and economics. Social Justice Research, 1 (1), 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crosby, F. J. and Lubin, E. P. (1990). Extending the moral community: Logical and psychological dilemmas. Journal of Social Issues, 46 (1), 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cvetkovich, G. and Earle, T. C. (1994). The construction of justice: A case study of public participation in land management. Journal of Social Issues, 50(2), 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. d’Eaubonne, F. (1980). Feminism or death. In E. Marks and I. de Courtivron (Eds.), New French feminism: An anthology. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  16. Deutsch, M. (1974). Awakening the sense of injustice. In M. J. Lerner and M. Ross (Eds.), The quest for justice: Myth, reality, ideal (pp. 19–42 ). Toronto: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  17. Dunlap, R. E. and Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The new environmental paradigm: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10–19.Google Scholar
  18. Ehrlich, S. (1982). Pluralism on and off course. Oxford: Pergamon PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Eliade, M. (1978). A history of religious ideas (Vol. 2) (W.R. Trask, Trans.). From Gautama Buddha to the Triumph of Christianity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1978 ).Google Scholar
  20. Fine, M. (1990). “The public” in public schools: The social construction/con-striction of moral communities. Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), 107–119.Google Scholar
  21. Finger, M. (1990). From knowledge to action? Exploring the relationships be-tween environmental experiences, learning, and behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 50 (2), 141–160.Google Scholar
  22. Greenberg, J. (1981). The justice of distributing scarce and abundant resources. In M. J. Lerner and S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior: Adapting to times of scarcity and change pp. 289–316. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  23. Greenwald, J. M. and Greenwald, R. (1994). Environmental attitudes conceptualized through developmental theory: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 50 (2), 29–47.Google Scholar
  24. Hargrove, E. C. (1989). Foundations of environmental ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NY: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  25. Higgins, E. T. (1981). Role-taking and social judgment: Alternative developmental perspectives and processes. In V. H. Flavell and L. Ross (Eds.), New directions in the study of social-cognitive development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Holmes, D. S. (1968). Dimensions of projection. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 248–268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Katz, C. and Kirby, A. (1991). In the nature of things: The environment and everyday life. Transactions of the Institute for British Geography, 16, 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kegan, R. (1982). The evolving self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Francisco, CA: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  29. Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. Vol 1. of Essays on moral development. San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  30. Kristol. E. (1989). False tolerance, false unity. New York Times, A19.Google Scholar
  31. Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County almanac. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lerner, M. J. (1975). The justice motive in social behavior: Introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 31 (3), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lerner, M. J. (1981). The justice motive in human relations: Some thoughts on what we know and need to know about justice. In M. J. Lerner and S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior: Adapting to times of scarcity and change (pp. 11–35 ). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  34. Lerner, M. J. and Whitehead, L. A. (1980). Procedural justice viewed in the context of justice motive theory. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction (pp. 219–256 ). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  35. Leventhal, G. S. (1972). Effects of external conflict on resource allocation and fairness within groups and organizations. In W. G. Austin and S. LeVine, R. A., and Campbell, D. T., Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict, ethnic attitude, and group behavior. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  36. List, P. C. (1993). Radical environmentalism: Philosophy and Tactics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  37. Lovelock, J. E. (1979). The Gaia Hypothesis: A new look of life on Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Meier, B. (1992). Wolves return to Montana and the greetings are mixed. The New York Times, Al, Al2.Google Scholar
  39. Merchant, C. (1979). The death of nature: Women, ecology and the scientific revolution. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  40. Merchant, C. (1989), Ecological revolutions, nature, gender, and science in New England. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  41. Merchant, C. (1992). Radical ecology: The search for a livable world. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Montada, L. (1980). Developmental changes in concepts of justice. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction (pp. 257–284 ). New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  43. Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology move-ments: A summary. Inquiry, 16, 95–100.Google Scholar
  44. Nash, N. C. (1993, June 21) Bolivia’s rain forest falls to relentless exploiters. The New York Times, Al, A8.Google Scholar
  45. Nash, R. F. (1989). The rights of nature. Madison, WI: University of Wiscons in Press.Google Scholar
  46. Opotow, S. V. (1987) Limits of fairness: An experimental examination of ante-cedents of the scope of justice. Dissertation Abstracts International, 48 (08B), 2500. (University microfilms No. 87–24072 )Google Scholar
  47. Opotow, S. (1990a). Moral exclusion and injustice: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 46 (1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Opotow, S. (1990b). Deterring moral exclusion. Journal of Social Issues, 46 (1), 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Opotow, S. (1990c). Justice beliefs in adolescents’ interpersonal conflicts with peers. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  50. Opotow, S. (1993). Animals and the scope of justice. Journal of Social Issues, 49 (1), 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Opotow, S. (1994). Predicting protection: Scope of justice and the natural world. Journal of Social Issues, 50 (2), 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Opotow, S. (1995). Drawing the line: Social categorization and moral exclusion. In J. Z. Rubin and B. B. Bunker, (Eds.), Conflict, Cooperation, and Justice (pp. 347–369 ). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  53. Opotow, S. and Clayton, S. (1994). Green justice: Conceptions of fairness and the natural world. Journal of Social Issues, 50 (2), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Passmore, J. (1975). Attitudes toward nature. In R.S. Peters (Eds.), Nature and conduct (pp. 251–264 ). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  55. Passmore, J. (1980). Man’s responsibility for nature ( 2nd ed. ). London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  56. Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1937 )CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Regan, T. (1983). The case for animal rights. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  58. Ross, M., Greene, D. and House, P. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ross, M. and Fletcher, G. J. O. (1985). Attribution and social perception. In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 73–122 ). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  60. Schweitzer, A. (1961). Out of my life and thought: An autobiography. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  61. Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221–279 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  62. Simmons, I. G. (1993). Interpreting nature: Cultural constructions of the environment. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Singer, P. (1975). Animal liberation: A new ethics for our treatment of animals. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
  64. Staub, E. (1979). Positive social behavior and morality: Socialization and development (Vol 2 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  65. Staub, E. (1990). Moral exclusion, personal goal theory, and extreme destructiveness. Journal of Social Issues, 46 (1), 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stern, P. C. and Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50 (2), 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stevens, M. (1994). Chief Joseph’s revenge. The New Yorker, pp. 26–33.Google Scholar
  68. Stevens, W. K. (1993). River life through U.S. broadly degraded. The New York Times, p. Cl, C7.Google Scholar
  69. Stone, C. (1988). Should trees have standing? Toward legal rights for natural objects. ( 2nd ed. ). Portola Valley, CA: Tioga Publishing.Google Scholar
  70. Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (European Monograph in Social Psychology, No. 14 ). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  71. Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Tolba, M. K. and El-Kholy, O. A., (Eds.). (1992). The world environment 19721992. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  73. Tyler, T. R. and Lind, E. A. (1990). Intrinsic versus community-based justice models: When does group membership matter? Journal of Social Issues, 46, (1), 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Warren, K. (1993). Power and promise of ecological feminism. Environmental Ethics, 12, 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan Opotow
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate Program in Dispute ResolutionUniversity of Massachusetts-BostonBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations