Numerical Methods for Evaluating Regenerator Performance

  • Robert A. Ackermann
Part of the The International Cryogenics Monograph Series book series (ICMS)

Abstract

In Chapter 3, we presented the closed-form solution for the ideal regenerator equations. These solutions demonstrated the intuition and insight analysts used to describe regenerator performance and their ingenuity in solving the ideal regenerator equations without the use of digital computers. In this chapter we will review the techniques used to obtain solutions in the open form. The analytical models in the open form are based on finite difference techniques, in which the differential equations are replaced with difference equations and solutions are obtained by a stepwise iterative process. Open-form models are divided into several levels of complexity distinguished by the assumption employed.

Keywords

Pressure Drop Void Volume Stanton Number Longitudinal Conduction Expansion Space 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackermann, R. A. (1967). The Influence of the Wall and Longitudinal Conduction Effects on the Performance of a Periodic-Flow Regenerator, Ph.D. thesis, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.Google Scholar
  2. Ackermann, R. A. (May 1981). Dynamic Analysis of a Small Free-Piston Resonant Cryorefrigerator, Refrigeration for Cryogenic Sensors and Electronic Systems, U.S. Department of Commerce/ National Bureau of Standards, NBS Publication 607, p. 57.Google Scholar
  3. Harris, W. S., Rios, P. A., and Smith, J. L. (1971). The design of thermal regenerators for Stirling-type refrigerators, in Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, Vol. 16 ( K. D. Timmerhaus, ed.), Plenum Press, New York, p. 312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kays, W. E., and London, A. L. (1964). Compact Heat Exchangers, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Lambertson, T. J. (1958). Performance factors of a periodic-flow heat exchanger, Trans. ASME 80, 586.Google Scholar
  6. Radebaugh, R., Gary, J., Marquardt, E., Louie, B., Daney, D., Arp, V, and Linenberger, D. (1992). Measurement and Calculation of Regenerator Ineffectiveness for Temperatures of 5 to 40 K, Flight Dynamics Directorate, Wright Laboratory, Wright—Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 45433–6553.Google Scholar
  7. Walker, G. (1973). Stirling-Cycle Machines, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  8. Yaron, R., and Mitchell, M. P. (July 4, 1995 ). Foil regenerator, U.S. Patent 5, 429, 177.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert A. Ackermann
    • 1
  1. 1.General Electric CompanySchenectadyUSA

Personalised recommendations