Theories that Create Coherence in Practice and Other Stories
In the past, it was as clear as it is today that things are not necessarily as we want them, and that improvement is needed. Nevertheless, there was a different expectation, as changes or ‘improvements’ would inevitably happen. They were considered a gift, however. One might get more money, food or riches, and thank the higher powers for their benevolence. The difference with the present is thus considerable. For the poor as well as the rich, the organised and the non-organised, the prisoner and the emprisoner, improvement has become a calling rather than a gift. This has made even the higher powers more accountable, also for their help.
KeywordsChief Executive Officer Soft System Methodology Empirical Content Mental Care Good Exemplar
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Checkland, P., & Scholes, J., 1990, “Soft Systems Methodology in Action”, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
- Checkland, P., 1981, “Systems Thinking, Systems Practice”, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
- Hayden, Ch., 1905, “ELIZA, version 1.3”, Software Program, Fair Haven N.Y. 07701.Google Scholar
- Mandler, J.M., 1984, “Stories, Scripts, and Scenes: Aspects of Schema Theory”, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
- Newell, A., & Simon, H.A., 1972, “Human Problem Solving”, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
- Schagen, S., 1994, “Over de Waarde van de Psychotherapie”, unpublished PhD Thesis University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- Vahl, M., 1994, “Improving Mental Health Services in Calderdale. An Evaluation of 5 Schemes Funded through the Mental Illness Specific Grant”, unpublished paper, Centre for Systems Studies, University of Hull, Hull.Google Scholar