Systems Theory and Management Thinking

  • Peter Checkland

Abstract

Two inquiring systems developed since the 1960s — Vickers’s concept of the appreciative system and the soft systems methodology, are highly relevant to the problems of the 21st century. Both assume that organizations are more than rational goal-seeking machines and address the relationship-maintaining and Gemeinschaft aspects of organisations, characteristically obscured by functionalist and goal-seeking models of organization and management. Appreciative systems theory and soft systems methodology enrich rather than replace these approaches.

Keywords

National Health Service Organization Theory System Thinking Soft System Methodology Operational Research Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackoff, R.L., 1957, Towards a Behavioural Theory of Communication, in: W. Buckley ed., “Modern Systems Research for the Behavioural Scientist”, (pp. 209–218), Aldine, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  2. Avison, D.E. and Wood-Harper, A.T., 1990, “Multiview: An Exploration in Infomation Systems Development”, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, P., and Luckmann, T., 1966, “The Social Construction of Reality,” Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
  4. Checkland, P., 1981, “Systems Thinking, Systems Practice,” John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  5. Checkland, P., 1993, OR and the Systems Movement, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 34, 661–675.Google Scholar
  6. Checkland, P., 1985(a), Achieving Desirable and Feasible Change: An application of Softy Systems Methodology, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 36, 821–831.Google Scholar
  7. Checkland, P., 1985(b), From Optimizing to Learning: a Development of Systems Thinking for the 1990s, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 36, 757–767.Google Scholar
  8. Checkland, P., 1994, Conventional Wisdom and Conventional Ignorance: The Revolution Organization Theory Missed, Organization, 1(1), 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Checkland, P., and Casar, A., 1986, Vickers’ Concept of an Appreciative System: A Systemic Account, Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 13, 3–17.Google Scholar
  10. Checkland, P., and Haynes, M.G., 1994, Varieties of Systems Thinking: The Case of Soft Systems Methodology, System Dynamics Review, 10, 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Checkland, P., and Holwell, S., 1993, Information Management and Organizational Processes: An Approach through Soft Systems Methodology, Journal of Information Systems, 3, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Checkland, P., and Poulter, J. 1994, “Application of Soft Systems Methodology to the Production of a Hosptial Information and Systems Strategy,” United Kingdom: HISS Central Team of the MHS Management Executive.Google Scholar
  13. Checkland, P., and Scholes, J., 1990, “Soft Systems Methodology in Action,” John Wiley & Sons, Chicheser.Google Scholar
  14. Davies, L., and Ledington, P., 1991, “Information in Action: Soft Systems Methodology,” Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  15. Donaldson, L., 1985, “In defence of organization theory,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  16. Hicks, M.J., 1991, “Problem Solving in Business and Management,” Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  17. Khandwalla, P.N., 1979, “The Design of Organizations,” Harcourt Brace, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Koestler, A., 1967, “The Ghost in the Machine,” Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
  19. Lawrence, P.R., and Lorsch, J.W., 1967, “Organization and Environment”, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  20. March, J.G., and Simon, H.A., 1958, “Organizations”, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Maturana, H.R., and Varela, F.J., 1980, “Autopoiesis and Cognition”, Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Newall, A., and Simon, H.A., 1972, “Human Problem Solving”, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  23. Patching, D., 1990, “Practical Soft Systems Analysis”, Pitman, London.Google Scholar
  24. Pugh, D.S., and Hickson, D.J., 1976, “Organization Structure in its Context”, Saxon House, Farnborough.Google Scholar
  25. Reed, M.I., 1985, “Redirections in Organisational Analysis”, Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
  26. Schutz, A., 1967, “The Phenomenology of the Social World”, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
  27. Silverman, D., 1970, “The Theory of Organizations”, Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
  28. Simon, H.A., 1957, “Administrative Behaviour”, 2nd Edition, Macmillan. New York.Google Scholar
  29. Simon, H. A., 1960, “The New Science of Management Decision”, Harper and Row, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tönnies, F., 1955, “Community and Association”, (Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft) (C.P. Loomis, Trans.). Routledge and Kegan Paul, London. (Original work published 1887).Google Scholar
  31. Varela, F.J., 1984, “Two Principles of Self-Organization”, in: “Self-organisation and Management of Social Systems”, H. Ulrich and G.J. Probst, (eds.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vickers, G., 1965, “The Art of Judgment”, Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  33. Waring, A., 1989, “Systems Methods for Managers”, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  34. Wilson, B., 1984, “Systems: Concepts, Methodologies and Application”, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  35. Woodward, J., 1965, “Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice”, Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
  36. Zannetos, Z.S., 1984, “Decision Sciences and Management Expectations”, in: “Operational Research ’84”, J.P. Brans, (ed.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 69–76.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Checkland
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LancasterLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations