The Role of Two Kinds of Efficacy Beliefs in Maintaining the Well-Being of Chronically Stressed Older Adults

  • Alex J. Zautra
  • Jeanne M. Hoffman
  • John W. Reich
Part of the The Springer Series on Stress and Coping book series (SSSO)

Abstract

The loss of autonomy that results from a disabling chronic illness is one of the most difficult and stressful experiences to cope with for an older adult. The ability lost is frequently never regained, and the older adult suffers from both the present loss and anticipation of a future of sustained and even increased confinement, both physical and psychological. As other investigators have found (see Zautra & Hempel, 1984, for a review), our research on older adults indicates that activity limitation has pervasive adverse effects on mental health (Reich & Zautra, 1988; Zautra, Guarnaccia, & Reich, 1988; Zautra, Reich, & Newsom, 1995). In comparison to those without impairment, older adults with functional loss often show more anxiety, more depression, less positive affect, and lower self-esteem (Reich & Zautra, 1988). The loss of autonomy due to chronic illness appears to lower one’s sense of personal control in general. Indeed, chronically ill adults show more fatalism, more helplessness (Smith & Wallston, 1992), and less perceived control over future events than do healthy controls (Lennon, Dohrenwend, Zautra, & Marbach, 1990).

Keywords

Psychological Distress Activity Limitation Network Member Efficacy Belief Coping Effort 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1992). Self-efficacy mechanism in psychobiologic functioning. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (p. 355–393 ). Washington DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A., andAdams, N. E. (1977). Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1, 287–310.Google Scholar
  3. Bradburn, N. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  4. Coyne, J. C. and Smith, D. A. F. (1994). Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: Contextual perspective on patient self-efficacy. Journal of Family Psychology, 8, 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cozzarelli, C. (1993). Personality and self-efficacy as predictors of coping with abortion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1224–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crowne, D. P., and Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Cutrona, C. E. (1990). Stress and social support-In search of optimal matching. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dohrenwend, B. P., Shrout, P. E., Egri, G., and Mendelsohn, F. S. (1980). Nonspecific psychological distress and other dimensions of psychopathology. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 1229–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elliott, G. R., and Eisdorfer, C. (Eds.). (1982). Stress and human health: Analysis and implications for research. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Epstein, S. (1979). The stability of behavior: I. On predicting most of the people much of the time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1097–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Finch, J. F., Okun, M. A., Barrera, M., Zautra, A. J., and Reich, J. W. (1989). Measurement models of positive and negative social ties: Their generalizability across elderly subgroups and their relationships to psychological distress and life satisfaction. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17, 585–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grossman, R. M. (1986). Attributions of responsibility and social support. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.Google Scholar
  13. Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
  14. Kahana, E., Kahana, B., and Riley, K. (1989). Person-environment transactions relevant to control and helplessness in institutional settings. In P. S. Fry (Ed.), Psychological perspectives of helplessness and control in the elderly (pp. 121–153 ). Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  15. Lawton, M. P. (1982). Competence, environmental press, and the adaptation of older people. In M. P. Lawton, P. G. Windley, and T. O. Byerts (Eds.), Aging and the environment: Theoretical approaches (pp. 35–39 ). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  17. Lee, G. P., Loring, D. W., Dahl, J. L., and Meador, K. J. (1993). Hemispheric specialization for emotional expression. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology, 6, 143–148.Google Scholar
  18. Lennon, M. C., Dohrenwend, B. P., Zautra, A. J., and Marbach, J. J. (1990). Coping and adaptation to facial pain in contrast to other stressful life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1040–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Levenson, H. (1981). Differentiating among internality, powerful others and chance. In H. M. Lefcourt (Ed.), Research with the locus of control construct: Vol. 1. assessment methods (pp. 15–63 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lewin, K. (1951). Selected theoretical papers. In D. Cartwright (Ed.). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  21. Manne, S., and Zautra, A. J. (1989). The effects of spouse critical remarks on psychological adjustment to rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 608617.Google Scholar
  22. Pearlin, L., and Schooler, C. (1978). The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19, 2–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reich, J., and Zautra, A. J. (1981). Life events and personal causation: Some relationships with satisfaction and distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 1002–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reich, J. W., and Zautra, A. J. (1988). Direct and moderating effects of positive life events. In L. N. Cohen (Ed.), Advances in research on stressful life events (pp. 149–181 ). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Reich, J. W., and Zautra, A. J. (1991). Experimental and measurement approaches to internal control in older adults. Journal of Social Issues, 47, 143–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reich, J. W., Zautra, A. J., and Guarnaccia, C. A. (1989). Effects of disability and bereavement on the mental health and recovery of older adults. Psychology and Aging, 4, 5765.Google Scholar
  27. Reich, J. W., Zautra, A. J., and Hill, J. (1987). Activity, event transactions and quality of life of the elderly. Psychology and Aging, 2, 116–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Revenson, T. A., and Felton, B. J. (1984). Disability and coping as predictors of psychological adjustment to rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 344–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith, C. A., and Wallston, K. A. (1992). Adaptation in patients with chronic rheumatoid arthritis: Application of a general model. Health Psychology, 11, 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Taylor, C. B., Bandura, A., Ewart, C. K., Miller, N. H., and Debusk, R. F. (1985). Exercise testing to enhance wives’ confidence in their husbands’ cardiac capabilities soon after clinically uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction. American Journal of Cardiology, 55, 635–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Teresi, J. A., Golden, R. R., Gurland, B. J., Wilder, D. E., and Bennett, R. G. (1983). Construct validity of indicator scales development from the comprehensive assessment and interview schedule. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  32. Watson, D., and Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zautra, A. J., Burleson, M., Matt, K., Roth, S., and Burrows, L. (1994). Interpersonal stress and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. Health Psychology, 13, 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zautra, A. J., Guarnaccia, C., and Reich, J. W. (1988). Structure of mental health of older adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 514–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zautra, A. J., Guenther, R. T., and Chartier, G. (1985). Attributions for real and hypothetical events: Their relation to self-esteem and depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 94, 530–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zautra, A. J., and Hempel, A. (1984). Subjective well-being and physical health status: A narrative review with some suggestions for future research. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 19, 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zautra, A. J., Okun, M. A., Robinson, S. E., Lee, D., Roth, S. H., and Emmanual, J. (1989). Life stress and lymphocyte alterations among rheumatoid arthritis patients. Health Psychology, 8, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zautra, A., and Reich, J. W. (1980). Positive life events and reports of well-being: Some useful distinctions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 8, 657–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zautra, A. J., Reich, J. W., and Guarnaccia, C. A. (1990). The everyday life consequences of disability and bereavement for older adults. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 550–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zautra, A. J., Reich, J. W., andNewsom, J. T. (1995). Autonomy and sense of control among older adults: An examination of their effects on mental health. In L. Bond, S. Cutter, and A. Grams (Eds.), Promoting successful and productive aging. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Zautra, A. J., and Wrabetz, A. (1991). Coping success and its relationship to psychological distress for older adults. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 801–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex J. Zautra
    • 1
  • Jeanne M. Hoffman
    • 1
  • John W. Reich
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations