Contemporary Topics in Medium Energy Physics pp 109-123 | Cite as
The Strange Content of the Baryons in the Su(3)-Nambu-Jona-Lasinio Model
Abstract
Today Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) is assumed to be the theory of the strong interactions. Nevertheless it could be proved only in the high energy regime thanks to the celebrated asymptotic freedom1. For the static properties of the mesons and baryons, which are described by the rather low energy features of QCD, up to now only the calculations on a lattice could give some crude estimates2,3. Therefore one was faced with developing some effective theories, which incorporate the relevant properties. These are chiral symmetry and the spontaneous breaking of this symmetry, which leads to the appearance of the so called Goldstone bosons. Within the SU(3)-flavor symmetry, which is in the present approach believed to be still a good symmetry of the strong interactions, these massless bosons are the pions, the kaons and the eta particle. Because in nature there are no massless mesons, one can give them a small mass via the introduction of small current quark masses. Besides the older Skyrme model4, which mimics these features by purely mesonic degrees of freedom, and the Gell-Mann Lévi model5, which contains in addition also valence quarks, there are above all the chiral quark model of Dyakonov and Petrov6 and the NambuJona-Lasinio (NJL) model 7. One should stress however that the latter ones are not only phenomenological models but can be viewed as some realistic long-wavelength expansion of QCD6–12. In these models the chiral symmetry is broken dynamically by the inclusion of the one-fermion loop contribution to the effective potential. These loop contributions represent in the solitonic sector of the theory theolarization of the whole Dirac sea due to the presence of the N c valence quarks13–17.
Keywords
Chiral Symmetry Skyrme Model Baryon Octet Constituent Quark Mass Chiral Quark ModelPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.D. J. Gross, Talk delivered at the Third International Symposium on the History of Particle Physics June 26, 1992, Princeton University Report No. PUPT 1329 (1992)Google Scholar
- 2.D.B. Leinweber, R.M. Woloshyn and T. Draper Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 1659ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.D.B. Leinweber,T. Draper and R.M. Woloshyn, preprint TRIUMF #TRI-PP-92–28Google Scholar
- 4.T.H.R. Skyrme, Proc. R. Soc.A 260 (1961) 127MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.M. Gell-Mann and M. Lévi, Nuov. Cim. 16 (1960) 705MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.D. Dyakonov and V. Petrov, Nucl.Phys. B272 (1986) 457;ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Y Nambu, G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122 (1961)345ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.R. Cahill and C. Roberts, Phys. Rev. D32 (1985) 2518Google Scholar
- 9.M. Schaden, H. Reinhardt, P.A. Amundsen and M.J. Lavelle, Nucl. Phys. B339 (1990) 595ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.U. Vogl and W. Weise, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 27 (1991) 195ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.R.D. Ball, Desperately seeking mesons, Workshop on Skyrmions and Anomalies ( Cracow, 1987 ) World Scientific (Singapore )Google Scholar
- 12.J. Bijnens, C. Bruno and E. de Rafael, preprint CERN TH6521/92, CPT-92/P. 2710 (May 1992)Google Scholar
- 13.D. Diakonov, V. Petrov and P. Pobylitsa, Nucl.Phys. B306 (1988) 809ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Th. Meissner, F. Gruemmer and K. Goeke, Phys.Lett. B306 (1989) 296Google Scholar
- 15.S. Kahana, G. Ripka and V. Soni, Nucl.Phys. A415 (1984) 351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.H. Reinhardt and R. Wuensch, Phys.Lett. B306 (1988) 577Google Scholar
- 17.S. Kahana and G. Ripka, Nucl.Phys. A429 (1984) 962Google Scholar
- 18.A. Blotz, D. Diakonov, K. Goeke, N.W. Park, V. Petrov, P.V. Pobylitza, Phys. Lett. B287 (1992) 29Google Scholar
- 19.H. Weigel, R. Alkofer and H. Reinhardt, Tuebingen University report (1992)Google Scholar
- 20.E. Witten, Nucl.Phys. B223 (1983) 433MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.E. Guadagnini, Nucl.Phys. B236 (1984) 35ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.A.V. Manohar, Nucl. Phys. B248(1984) 19ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.A.P. Balachandran, F. Lizzi, V.G.J. Rodgers, A. Stern, Nucl. Phys. B256(1985) 525ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.M. Chemtob, Nucl. Phys. B256(1985) 600ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.P. Mazur, M. Nowak and M. Praszalowicz, Phys.Lett. 147B (1984) 137MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 26.S. Jain and S.R. Wadia, Nucl.Phys. B258 (1985) 713ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.J.A. McGovern, M. Birse, Nucl. Phys. A506(1990)367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.M. Wakamatsu, Phys. Rev. D42 (1990) 2427ADSGoogle Scholar
- 29.M. Wakamatsu and H. Yoshiki, Nucl.Phys. A524 (1991) 561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.T. Eguchi, Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 2755MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 31.A. Blotz and K. Goeke, Ruhr-University Report No. RUB-TPII-28/92 (1992)Google Scholar
- 32.A. Blotz, D.Diakonov, K. Goeke, N.W. Park, V. Petrov, P.V. Pobylitza, Ruhr-University Report No. RUB-TPII-27/92 (1992)Google Scholar
- 33.G. Ripka and S. Kahana, Phys.Rev. D36 (1987) 1233ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.G.S. Adkins, C.R. Nappi and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 228 (1983) 552ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.N. Toyota, Prog. Theor. Phys. 77 (1987) 688ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Th. Meissner, F. Gruemmer and K. Goeke, Ann. Phys. 202 (1990) 297ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.K. Fujii, K.I. Sato, N. Toyota, A.P. Kobushkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 (1987) 651ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.J.J. De Swart, Rev. Mod. Phys. 35 (1963) 916Google Scholar
- 39.P.V. Pobylitsa, E. Ruiz-Arriola, Th. Meissner, F. Gruemmer, K. Goeke, W. Broniowski, J. Phys. G18 (1992) 1455Google Scholar
- 40.M. Gell-Mann, Phys.Rev. 125 (1962) 1067MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.S. Okubo, Progr. Theor. Phys. 27 (1962) 349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.J. Donoghue and C.R. Nappi, Phys. Lett. B168(1986)105Google Scholar
- 43.H. Yabu, Phys. Lett. B 218 (1989) 124Google Scholar
- 44.H. Yabu and K. Ando, Nucl. Phys. B 301 (1988)601ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.M. Praszalowicz, A. Blotz and K. Goeke, Phys. Rev. D in pressGoogle Scholar
- 46.H. Weigel, J. Schechter, N.W. Park and Ulf-G. Meissner, Phys. Rev. D42 (1990) 3177ADSGoogle Scholar
- 47.A. Blotz, M. Polyakov and K. Goeke, Ruhr-University Report No. RUB-TPII-29/92 (1992)Google Scholar