Contemporary Topics in Medium Energy Physics pp 177-192 | Cite as
Heavy Quark Symmetry and Heavy-Flavor-Conserving Nonleptonic Weak Decays
Abstract
Recent years have seen intense activities in the field of heavy quark physics, and remarkable progress has been made.1–11 In the limit of infinite heavy quark mass, the strong interactions of a heavy quark become much simplified. Namely, the effective QCD Lagrangian becomes independent of the flavor and spin of the heavy quark. For N f heavy quark flavors, the new spin and flavor symmetries combine to form a SU(2N f ) symmetry group (heavy quark symmetry) which is not manifest in the original Lagrangian. Heavy quark symmetry allows us to predict many properties of heavy hadrons, which are taken to be particles containing a single heavy quark. Of course, even in this infinite heavy quark mass limit, low energy hadronic physics (confinement, etc.) remains non-perturbative and there is still no solution to it. What heavy quark symmetry can do for us is to provide simplifying relations among the static and transition properties of the heavy hadrons. For instance, the spin-flavor symmetry implies that the excitation spectrum and transition form factors of a heavy hadron do not depend on the spin and flavor of the heavy quark involved. Thus, in the symmetry limit, the heavy quark behaves like a static color source. This is analogous to the well known case of a hydrogen-like atom, whose excitation spectrum and transition form factors are independent of the mass and spin of its heavy nucleus, which acts as a static charge source.
Keywords
Heavy Quark Light Quark Transition Form Factor Heavy Meson Heavy BaryonPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.S. Nussinov and W. Wetzel, Phys. Rev. D36, 130 (1987)ADSGoogle Scholar
- M.B. Voloshin and M.A. Shifman, Soy. J. Nucl. Phys. 45, 292 (1987)Google Scholar
- G.P. LePage and B.A. Thacker, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 4, 199 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- H.D. Politzer and M.B. Wise, Phys. 681 (1988);Google Scholar
- 2.N. Isgur and M.B. Wise Phys. Lett. B232, 113 (1989);Google Scholar
- 3.E. Eichten and B. Hill, B234, 511 (1990).Google Scholar
- 4.H. Georgi, Phys. Lett. B240, 447 (1990).Google Scholar
- 5.B. Grinstein, Nucl. Phys. B339, 253 (1990).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.N. Isgur and M.B. Wise, Nucl. Phys. B348, 276 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.A.F. Falk, H. Georgi, B. Grinstein, and M.B. Wise, Nucl. Phys. B343, 1 (1990).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.H. Georgi, Nucl. Phys. B348, 293 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.M.B. Wise, in “Particle Physics - The Factory Era”, B.A. Campbell, A.N. Kamal, P. Kitching, and F.C. Khanna, ed., World Scientific, Singapore (1991).Google Scholar
- 10.J.D. Bjorken, in “Proceedings of the 18th SLAC Summer Institute on Particle Physics”, J. Hawthorne, ed., SLAC, Stanford (1990).Google Scholar
- 11.H. Georgi, in “Perspectives in the Standard Model”, R.K. Ellis, C.T. Hill, and J.D. Lykken, ed., World Scientific, Singapore (1992).Google Scholar
- 12.T.M. Yan, H.Y. Cheng, C.Y. Cheung, G.L. Lin, Y.C. Lin, and H.L. Yu, Phys. Rev. D46, 1148 (1992)Google Scholar
- T.M. Yan, Chin. J. Phys. 30, 509 (1993).Google Scholar
- 13.M.W. Wise, Phys. Rev. D45, R2188 (1992).ADSGoogle Scholar
- 14.G. Burdman and J. Donoghue, Phys. Lett. B280, 287 (1992).Google Scholar
- 15.P. Cho, Phys. Lett. B285, 145 (1922).Google Scholar
- 16.H.Y. Cheng, C.Y. Cheung, G.L. Lin, Y.C. Lin, T.M. Yan, and H.L. Yu, Phys. Rev. D47, 1030 (1993).ADSGoogle Scholar
- 17.P. Cho and H. Georgi, Phys. Lett. B296, 408 (1992).Google Scholar
- 18.H.Y. Cheng, C.Y. Cheung, G.L. Lin, Y.C. Lin, T.M. Yan, and H.L. Yu, Phys. Rev. D46, 5060 (1992).ADSGoogle Scholar
- 19.Particle Data Group, Phys. Rev. D45, S1 (1992).ADSGoogle Scholar
- 20.See, e.g., H.Y. Cheng, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A4, 495 (1989).Google Scholar
- 21.See, e.g., H. Georgi, “Weak Interactions and Modern Particle Theory”, Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA (1984).Google Scholar
- 22.A. Chodos, R.L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, and C.B. Thorn, Phys. Rev. D10 2599 (1974).MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
- T. DeGrand, R.L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, and J. Kiskis, ibid. D12 2060 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.B. Stech, Nucl. Phys., 106 (1988)Google Scholar
- H.G. Dosch, M. Jamin, and B. Stech, Z. Phys. C 42, 167 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- M. Jamin and M. Neubert, Phys. Lett. 238 387 (1990)Google Scholar
- M. Neubert and B. Stech, Phys. Rev. D44, 775 (1991).ADSGoogle Scholar