A Computational Model of Spatial Representations that Explains Object-Centered Neglect in Parietal Patients

Abstract

Patients with parietal cortex lesions exhibit unusual visual deficits, typically involving the neglect of a part of their visual space. Without being consciously aware of it, they act as if that part of space is not visible. At first, it was thought that this neglected space coincided with the visual hemifield contralateral to the lesioned hemisphere, but more recently, an increasing number of experiments [1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11] have shown that in many cases, the neglected part of space is related to a reference object of immediate interest. For example, in a recent experiment by Behrmann et al. [3], a patient with a right parietal lobe lesion was asked to count the number of instances of the letter “A” in a field of letters on a TV screen (see Figure 1). The eye movements recorded from the subjects showed that they typically neglected to look at most of the “A”s in the left side of the TV screen. Note that the neglect cannot be explained as a visual hemifield neglect because, as the patient makes eye movements, the letters that appear in each hemifield change.

Keywords

Parietal Cortex Spatial Representation Iconic Representation Unilateral Neglect Contralesional Side 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    M. Behrmann and M. Moscovitch. Object-centered neglect in patients with unilateral neglect: Effects of left-right coordinates of objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6 (1): 1–16, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    M. Behrmann and S.P. Tipper. Object-based attentional mechanisms: Evidence from patients with unilateral neglect. In C. Umilta and M. Moscovitch, editors, Attention and PerformanceXV: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    M. Behrmann, S. Watt, S.E. Black, and J.J.S. Barton. Impaired visual search in patients with unilateral neglect: An oculographic analysis. Submitted, 1996.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    J.M. Buhmann, M. Lades, and C.v.d. Malsburg. Size and distortion invariant object recognition by hierarchical graph matching. In Proc. IEEE IJCNN, San Diego (Vol. II), pages 411–416, 1990.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    R. Calvanio, P. N. Petrone, and D. Levine. Left visual spatial neglect is both environment-centered and body-centered. Neurology, 37: 1179–1183, 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. Caramazza and A.E. Hillis. Spatial representation of words in the brain implied by studies of a unilateral neglect patient. Nature, 346: 267–269, 1990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    M. J. Farah, J. L. Brunn, A. B. Wong, M. Wallace, and P. Carpenter. Frames of reference for the allocation of spatial attention: Evidence from the neglect syndrome. Neuropsvchologia, 28: 335–347, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    M. Gazzaniga and E. Ladavas. Disturbances in spatial attention following lesion or disconnection of the right parietal lobe. In M. Jeannerod, editor, Neurophysiological and Neuropsychological Aspects of Spatial Neglect. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1987.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    G.E. Hinton. A parallel computation that assigns canonical object-based frames of reference. In 7th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 683–685, 1981.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    J. Beng-Hee Ho, M. Behrmann, and D.C. Plaut. The interaction of spatial reference frames and hierarchical object representations: A computational investigation of drawing in hemispatial neglect. In Proc. 17th Annual Conf of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 148–153, 1995.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    E. Ladavas. Is hemispatial deficit produced by right parietal damage associated with retinal or gravitational coordinates. Brain, 110: 167–180, 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    B. Mel. A neurally-inspired approach to 3-D visual object recognition. Presentation at Telluride Workshop on Neuromorphic Engineering, Telluride, Colorado, July 1994.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    A. Pouget and T.J. Sejnowski. A model of spatial representations in parietal cortex explains hemineglect. In D. Touretzky, M. Mozer, and M. Hasselmo, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 8, pages 10–16. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    R.P.N. Rao and D.H. Ballard. Learning saccadic eye movements using multistate spatial filters. In G. Tesauro, D.S. Touretzky, and T.K. Leen, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 7, pages 893–900. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    R.P.N. Rao and D. H. Ballard. An active vision architecture based on iconic representations. Artificial Intelligence (Special Issue on Vision), 78: 461–505, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    R.P.N. Rao and D.H. Ballard. A class of stochastic models for invariant recognition, motion, and stereo. Technical Report 96. 1, National Resource Laboratory for the Study of Brain and Behavior, Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester, June 1996.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    R.P.N. Rao and D.H. Ballard. Dynamic model of visual recognition predicts neural response properties in the visual cortex. Neural Computation (in press). Also, Technical Report 96.2, National Resource Laboratory for the Study of Brain and Behavior, Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester, 1996.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    R.P.N. Rao and D.H. Ballard. Cortico-cortical dynamics and learning during visual recognition: A computational model. In J. Bower, editor, Computation Neuroscience 1996. New York, NY: Plenum Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    R.P.N. Rao, G.J. Zelinsky, M.M. Hayhoe, and D.H. Ballard. Modeling saccadic targeting in visual search. In D. Touretzky, M. Mozer, and M. Hasselmo, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 8, pages 830–836. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    P. Viola. Feature-based recognition of objects. In AA AI Fall Symposium on Learning and Computer Vision, 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of RochesterRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations