The Relativity of Reality

Second-Order Change in Psychotherapy
  • E. Thomas Dowd
  • Terry M. Pace

Abstract

The view that people are active participants in the construction of their own reality is the hallmark of constructivist approaches to psychological theory, which stands in contrast to purely empiricist approaches to psychology. Modern psychology, especially in America, has been dominated by empiricism. Both behaviorism (e.g., Hull, 1943; Skinner, 1974; Watson, 1925) and its chief competitor, information-processing psychology (e.g., Anderson & Bower, 1973; Atkinson & Shiffrin, 1968; Newell & Simon, 1972) are tied to empiricist philosophy that holds that reality exists independently of the perceiver and that knowledge is acquired only through sensory experience. Weimer (1977) has described this common metatheoretical base of both behaviorism and information-processing psychology as a sensory metatheory of the mind.

Keywords

Knowledge Structure Cognitive Therapy Therapeutic System Symptomatic Behavior Constructivist Position 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. R., and Bower, G. H. (1973). Human associative memory. Washington, DC: V. H. Winston.Google Scholar
  3. Amkoff, D. B. (1980). Psychotherapy from the perspective of cognitive theory. In M. J. Mahoney (Ed.), Psychotherapy process (pp. 339–362 ). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  4. Atkinson, R. C., and Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence and J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, A. T. (1967). Depression: Clinical, experimental and theoretical aspects. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  8. Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bergin, A. E., and Lambert, M. J. (1978). The evaluation of therapeutic outcomes. In S. L. Garfield and A. E. Bergin (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 139–190 ). New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
  10. Beutler, L. E. (1979). Toward specific psychological therapies for specific conditions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 882–897.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beutler, L. E. (1983). Eclectic psychotherapy: A systematic approach. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bobrow, D. G., and Norman. D. A. (1975). Some principles of memory schemata. In D. G. Bobrow and A. Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding (pp. 1–34). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Brewer, W. F., and Nakumura, G. V. (1984). The nature and function of schemas. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. and T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 119–160 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Claiborn, C. D. (1982). Interpretation and change in counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29, 439–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Claiborn, C. D., and Dowd, E. T. (1985). Attributional interpretations in counseling: Content versus discrepancy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 188–196.Google Scholar
  17. Derry, P. A., and Kuiper, N. A. (1981). Schematic processing and self-reference in clinical depressives. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90, 286–297.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dowd, E. T., and Milne, C. R. (1986). Paradoxical interventions in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 14, 237–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dowd, E. T., and Swoboda, J. S. (1984). Paradoxical interventions in behavior therapy. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 15, 229–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frank, J. D. (1973). (Rev. ed.). Persuasion and healing. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
  21. Guidano, V. F., and Liotti, G. (1982). Cognitive processes and emotional disorders: A structural approach to psychotherapy. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  22. Guidano, V. F., and Liotti, G. (1985). A constructionist foundation for cognitive therapy. In M. J. Mahoney and A. E. Freeman (Eds.), Cognition and psychotherapy (pp. 101–142). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hastie, R. (1981). Schematic principles in human memory. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, and M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social Cognition: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 39–88 ).Google Scholar
  24. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
  25. Jahn, D. L., and Lichstein, K. L. (1980). The resistive client: A neglected phenomenon in behavior therapy. Behavior Modification, 4, 303–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keeney, B. P. (1983). Aesthetics of change. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  28. Kopel, S., and Arkowitz, H. (1975). The role of attribution and self-perception in behavior change: Implications for behavior therapy. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 92, 175–121.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuiper, N., and Deny, P. (1982). Depressed and nondepressed content self-reference in mild depressives. Journal of Personality, 50, 62–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mahoney, M. J. (1980). Psychotherapy and the structure of personal revolutions. In M. J. Mahoney (Ed.), Psychotherapy processes (pp. 157–180 ). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mahoney, M. J. (Ed.). (1985). Psychotherapy and human change processes. In M. J. Mahoney and A. E. Freeman (Eds.), Cognition and psychotherapy (pp. 3–48 ). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mancuso, J. C., and Adams-Weber, J. R. (1982). The construing person. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  33. Mandler, G. (1984). Mind and body: Psychology of emotion and stress. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  34. Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social sychology, 35, 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Markus, H., and Smith, J. (1981). The influence of self-schemata on the perception of others. In N. Cantor and J. F. Kihlstrom (Eds.), Personality, cognition, and socialization (pp. 223–262).Google Scholar
  36. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Markus, H., Smith, J., and Moreland, R. L. (1985). Role of the self-concept in the perception of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1494–1512.Google Scholar
  37. McDonald, M. R., and Kuiper, N. A. (1985). Efficiency and automaticity of self-schema processing in clinical depressives. Motivation and Emotion, 9, 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Miller, P. H. (1983). Piaget’s cognitive-stage theory. In P. H. Miller (Ed), Theories of developmental psychology. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  39. Minsky, M. A. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211–277 ). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  40. Neimeyer, R. A. (1986). Personal construct therapy. In W. Dryden and W. L. Golden (Eds.), Cognitive behavioral approaches to psychotherapy (pp. 224–260 ). London: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  41. Neisser, V. (1976). Cognition and reality. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  42. Newell, A., and Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Nystedt, L., and Magnusson, D. (1982). Construction of experience: The construction corallary. In J. C. Mancuro and J. R. Adams-Webber (Eds.), The construing person (pp. 33–44 ). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  43. Omer, H. (1981). Paradoxical treatments: A unified concept. Psychotherapy Theory, Research, and Practice, 18, 320–324.Google Scholar
  44. Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Piaget, J. (1970). Structuralism. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  46. Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  47. Popper, K. R. (1966). The open society and its enemies ( 5th ed. ). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Claredon Press.Google Scholar
  49. Popper, K. R., and Eccles, J. C. (1977). The self and its brain. New York: Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Riedel, R. (1984). The consequences of causal thinking. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality (pp. 69–94 ). New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  51. Rosch, E., and Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rummelhardt, D. E. (1975). Notes on a schema for stories. In D. G. Bobrow and A. Collins (Eds.), Representations and understandings: Studies in cognitive science (pp. 211–236 ). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  53. Rummelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, and W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education (pp. 33–58 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  54. Rummelhart, D. E., and Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, and W. E. Mortague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  55. Schank, R., and Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  56. Sloane, R. B., Staples, F. R., Cristol, A. H., Yorkston, N. J., and Whipple, K. (1975). Psychotherapy versus behavior therapy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Taylor, S. E., and Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, and M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  58. Turk, D. C., and Salovey, P. (1985). Cognitive structures, cognitive processes, and cognitive behavior modification. Client issues. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 9, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Varela, F. J. (1984). The creative circle: Sketches on the natural history of circularity. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality (pp. 309–323 ). New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  60. Watzlawick, P. (1984). The invented reality. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  61. Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J., and Fisch, R. (1974). Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  62. Watson, J. B. (1925). Behaviorism. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  63. Weimar, W. B. (1977). A conceptual framework for cognitive psychology: Motor theories of the mind. In R. Shaw and J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 267–311 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  64. Wyer, R. S., and Srull, T. K. (1981). Category accessibility: Some theoretical and empirical issues concerning the processing of social stimulus information. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, and M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 161–197 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Thomas Dowd
    • 1
  • Terry M. Pace
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Educational PsychologyKent State UniversityKentUSA
  2. 2.Department of Educational PsychologyUniversity of NebraskaLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations