Dephasing Time Measurements in Quantum Dots by Non-Degenerate Four Wave Mixing

  • A. Uhrig
  • U. Woggon
  • M. Portuné
  • V. Sperling
  • C. Klingshirn
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSB, volume 330)

Abstract

Studies on the relaxation process of coherently excited polarizations associated with excited states are interesting to reveal the mechanisms of dephasing in quantum confined semiconductor systems. In two-dimensional systems like quantum wells (QW) or superlattices (SL), the most important mechanisms considered are the scattering of the excited electron-hole pairs with phonons (LO-phonons or confined acoustic phonons), with interface potential fluctuations or localized states or, at higher excitation densities, the scattering by carrier-carrier interaction. In QD’s, at present, the relative contribution of these mechanisms to the dephasing process is an open question and one is trying to identify the different dephasing processes from the experiment. To determine ultrafast relaxation times in the range below 100 fs, various nonlinear spectroscopic methods in the frequency domain have been applied, like hole-burning spectroscopy [1–3] or coherent transient spectroscopy using broadband incoherent light [4,5]. In the present paper the method of nondegenerate four-wave mixing (NDFWM) has been used to derive the dephasing time T 2. The samples investigated are CdS and CdS0.7Se0.3 quantum dots in glass with radii 2 to 3 times larger than the Bohr radius. The large sizes were chosen to minimize the interface influence and by this to investigate the electron-hole pair states before trapping. The minor importance of trap states have been deduced from the dominance of a sharp band-edge related luminescence for these large dot sizes [6]. The dephasing times determined are consistent with results from differential absorption spectroscopy [7,8] at comparable excitation densities. As a new phenomenon we discuss the influence of carrier-carrier scattering in the weak confinement range and determine the dephasing time of this process by increasing gradually the excitation intensity.

Keywords

Quantum Well Diffraction Efficiency Excitation Intensity Dephasing Time Dephasing Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    A.P. Alivisatos, A.L. Harris, N.J. Levinos, M.L. Steigerwald, and L.E. Brus, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 4001 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    N. Peyghambarian, B. Fluegel, D. Hulin, A. Migus, M. Joffre, A. Antonetti, S.W. Koch, and M. Lindberg, IEEE J. Quant. Electr. QE-25, 2516 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    P. Roussignol, D. Ricard, and C. Flytzanis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 312 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    N. Morita and T. Yajima, Phys. Rev. A 30, 2525 (1984).ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    G.L. Huang and H.S. Kwok, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 9, 2019 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. Uhrig, L. Banyai, Y.Z. Hu, S.W. Koch, C. Klingshirn, N. Neuroth, Z. Phys. B 81, 385 (1990).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    U. Woggon, S. Gaponenko, W. Langbein, A. Uhrig, C. Klinghshirn, Phys. Rev. B 47, 3684 (1993).ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    U. Woggon, A. Uhrig, M. Saleh, and C. Klingshirn, Proc. II–VI conference Rhode Island/USA 1993, to be publ. J. Crystal Growth.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    T. Yajima and H. Souma, Phys. Rev. A 17, 309 and 324 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    E. Hanamura, Phys. Rev. B 46, 4718 (1992).ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    R. W. Schoenlein, D.M. Mittleman, J.J. Shiang, A.P. Alivisatos, and C.V. Shank, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1014 (1993).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    U. Siegner, D. Weber, E.O. Göbel, D. Bennhardt, V. Heuckeroth, R. Saleh, S.D. Baranovskii, P. Thomas, H. Schwab, C. Klingshirn, J.M. Hvam, V.G. Lyssenko, Phys. Rev. B 46, 4564 (1992).ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Uhrig
    • 1
  • U. Woggon
    • 1
  • M. Portuné
    • 1
  • V. Sperling
    • 1
  • C. Klingshirn
    • 1
  1. 1.Fachbereich PhysikUniversität KaiserslauternKaiserslauternGermany

Personalised recommendations