Accumulation of Dissolved Carbon by the Solitary Coral Balanophyllia Elegans — an Alternative Nutritional Pathway?

  • Peter V. Fankboner

Abstract

In classical treatments of their feeding biology, madreporarian corals are viewed as chiefly carnivorous (Hyman, 1940; Yonge, 1930). However, some recent studies indicate that hard corals may obtain their nutritional requirements by not one, but several means including autotrophy, particulate feeding and accumulation of dissolved organic material. For example, coral species which host endosymbiontic zooxanthellae accrue nutritional benefit in the form of soluble carbohydrates released by their algal guests (Lewis and Smith, 1971; Goreau, Goreau and Yonge, 1971). Sorokin (1972 and 1973) has confirmed that some scleractinian corals feed upon planktonic algae and bacteria. However, the nutritional role of dissolved organic matter in corals is less certain than autotrophy and particulate feeding. Studies by Stephens (1962) upon the hermatypic coral Fungia scutaria have demonstrated that under laboratory conditions, F. scutaria is capable of accumulating 14C-labelled glucose and amino acids from modest concentrations made available in seawater. Nonetheless, the significance of dissolved organic material in the nutrition of corals remains to be established because, to date, there have been no experiments in this regard carried out under natural field conditions. The experiments reported here were undertaken to determine whether the solitary coral Balanophyllia elegans Verrill will accumulate under in situ conditions, dissolved carbon exudated by the “large kelp” Macrocystis integrifolia.

Keywords

Reef Coral Dissolve Organic Matter Scleractinian Coral Dissolve Carbon Coral Skeleton 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Goreau, T. F., Goreau, N. I., and C. M. Yonge, 1971. Reef corals: autotrophs or heterotrophs? Biol. Bull., 141: 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hyman, L. H., 1940. The Invertebrates: Protozoa through Ctenophora. Volume I. McGraw-Hill Company, New York. 696 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Johannes, R. E., Coward, S. J., and K. L. Webb, 1969. Are dissolved amino acids an energy source for marine invertebrates? Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 29: 283–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lewis, D. H., and D. C. Smith, 1971. The autotrophic nutrition of symbiotic marine coelenterates with special reference to hermatypic corals. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Series B, 178: 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lobban, C. W., 1974. A simple, rapid method of solubilizing algal tissue for scintillation counting. Limnol. Oceanogr., 19: 356–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Sorokin, YU. I. 1972. Bacteria as food for coral reef fauna. Oceanology, USSR, 1: 169–177.Google Scholar
  7. Sorokin, YU. I., 1973. On the feeding of some scleractinian corals with bacteria and dissolved organic matter. Limnol. Oceanogr., 18: 380–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Stephens, G. C., 1962. Uptake of organic material by aquatic invertebrates. 1. Uptake of glucose by the solitary coral, Fungia scutaria. Biol. Bull., 123: 648–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Yonge, C. M., 1930. Physiology of reef corals: feeding mechanisms and food. Scient. Rep. Gt. Barrier Reef Exped., 1: 13–57.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter V. Fankboner
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.BamfieldCanada
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations