A Hypothesis-Testing Approach to Assessment

  • Kevin W. Walsh
Part of the Critical Issues in Neuropsychology book series (CINP)

Abstract

Neuropsychological evaluation is no longer limited to earlier considerations of “brain damage” or of regional diagnosis. Present-day emphasis, instead, is on an understanding of the ways in which psychological functions are compromised or spared by neurological disorders. One goal of such an evaluation is to provide a basis for developing strategies of compensation or retraining, which will allow the individual with acquired deficits to function more effectively. Thus, there is a need for flexibility to cover all types of cases likely to be presented. Hypothesis-testing methodology is seen as an efficient way to pursue this aim. Centered on the examination of single cases, it regards clinical neuropsychology as an applied science. As such, it calls on all relevant knowledge from neuropsychology and related disciplines, such as neurology and neuropathology, as well as cognate areas of psychology.

Keywords

Associate Learn Verbal Fluency Whiplash Injury Neuropsychological Evaluation Transient Global Amnesia 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benton, A. L. (1985). Some problems associated with neuropsychological assessment. Bulletin of Clinical Neurosciences, 50, 11–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Binder, L., & Pankratz, L. (1987). Neuropsychological evidence of a fictitious memory complaint. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 9. 167–17I.Google Scholar
  3. Brun, A. (1987). Frontal lobe degeneration of non-Alzheimer type, I: Neuropathology. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 6, 193–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buisson, G. (1989). A props d’un cas d’état démentiel précoce: Maladie de Pick ou schizophrenie’? Annales Medico-Psychologiques, 147, 12I - 124.Google Scholar
  5. Dana, R. H. (1966). Eisegesis and assessment. Journal of Projective Techniques, 30, 215–222.Google Scholar
  6. Fisher, C. M. (1982). Whiplash amnesia. Neurology, 32, 667–668.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goldberg, E., & Costa, L. D. (1986). Qualitative indices in neuropsychological assessment. An extension of Luria’s approach to executive deficit following prefrontal lesions. In I. Grant & K. M. Adams (Eds.), Neuropsychological assessment of neuropsychiatrie disorders (pp. 48–64 ). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gustafson, L. (1987). Frontal lobe degeneration of non-Alzheimer type, II: Clinical picture and differential diagnosis. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 6, 209–223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hampton, J. R., Harrison, M. J. G., Mitchell, J. R. A., Pritchard, J. S., & Seymour, C. (1975). Relative contributions of history taking, physical examination, and laboratory investigation to diagnosis and management of medical out-patients. British Medical Journal, 2, 486–489.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hofstad, H., & Gjerde, I. O. (1985). Transient global amnesia after whiplash injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 48, 956–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johanson, A., & Hagberg, B. (1989). Psychometric characteristics in patients with frontal lobe degeneration of non-Alzheimer type. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 8, 129–137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaplan, E. (1983). Process and achievement revisted. In S. Wapner & B. Kaplan (Eds.), Toward a holistic developmental psychology (pp. 143–156 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Kaplan, E. (1988). A process approach to neuropsychological assessment. In T. Boll & B. K. Bryant (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology and brain function: Research, measurement, and practice (pp. 125–167 ). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  14. Knopman, D. S., Christensen, K. J., Schut, L. J., Harbaugh, R. E., Reeder, T.. Ngo, T.. amp; Frey, W. (1989). The spectrum of imaging and neuropsychological findings in Pick’s disease. Neurology, 39, 362–368.Google Scholar
  15. Levin, H. S., Eisenberg, H. M., & Benton. A. L. (Eds.). (1989). Mild head injury. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lezak, M. D. (1983). Neuropsychological assessment (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. Lezak, M. D. (1988). IQ: R. I. P. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10, 351–61.Google Scholar
  17. Matias-Guiu, J., Buenaventura, I., & Codina, A. (1985). Whiplash amnesia. Neurology, 35, 1259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McCarthy, R. A., & Warrington, E. A. (1990). Cognitive neuropsychology: A clinical introduction. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  19. Miller, E. (1983). A note on the interpretation of data derived from neuropsychological tests. Cortex, 19, 131–132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Neary, D. (1990). Non-Alzheimer’s disease forms of cerebral atrophy. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 53, 929–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Neary, D., Snowden, J. S., Northen, B., & Goulding, P. (1988). Dementia of frontal type. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 51, 353–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Orrell, M. W., Sahakian, B. J., & Bergman, K. (1989). Self-neglect and frontal lobe dysfunction. British Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 101–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ryan, C., & Butters, N. (1980). Learning and memory impairment in young and old alcoholics: Evidence for the premature aging hypothesis. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 4, 288–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shallice, T. (1982). Specific impairments of planning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 298, 199–209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structure. New York: Cambridge University Press. Shapiro, M. B. (1951). Experimental studies of a perceptual anomaly, I: Initial experiments. Journal of Mental Science, 97, 90–100.Google Scholar
  26. Shapiro, M. B. (1967). Intensive assessment of the single case: An inductive—deductive approach. In P. Mittler (Ed.), The psychological assessment of mental and physical handicaps (pp. 645–666 ). London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  27. Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1991). A compendium of neuropsychological tests. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Tissot, R., Constantinidis, J., & Richard, J. (1985). Pick’s disease. In J. A. M. Frederiks (Ed.), Handbook of clinical neurology (Vol. 46, pp. 233–246 ). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  29. Walsh, K. W. (1991). Understanding brain damage: A primer of neuropsychological evaluation ( 2nd ed. ). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
  30. Wechsler, D. (1944). The measurement of human intelligence. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin W. Walsh
    • 1
  1. 1.Austin HospitalMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations