Communication: Key to School-Home Relations(1)

  • Edward Earl Gotts
  • Richard F. Purnell

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to introduce and define, review the literature and current thinking on, and report the authors’ research endeavors and results on the topic of school-home communication. The fundamental premise for being concerned about this topic is that the educational progress and well-being of children are the mutual interest of schools and families. Unfortunately, various forces in our society have been at work for some years to demutualize this important relationship. The study of school-home communications offers a very promising means of realigning the interests of the home and the school, with our children being the primary beneficiaries of greater collaboration between the two.

Keywords

Parent Involvement School Personnel American Educational Research Association School Behavior Document Reproduction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alden, J. W. (1979). A broader definition of citizen participation. In R. S. Brandt (Ed.), Partners: Parents Schools. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  2. Anselmo, S. (1977). Parent involvement in the schools. Clearing House, 50 (7), 297–299.Google Scholar
  3. Barth, R. (1979). Home-based reinforcement of school behavior: A review and analysis. Review of Educational Research, 49(3), 436458.Google Scholar
  4. Berlin, R., Berlin, I. N. (1973). School’s training of parents to be effective teachers of their own and other nonlearning children,(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 099 110.)Google Scholar
  5. Bittle, R. G. (1975). Improving parent-teacher communication through recorded telephone messages. Journal of Educational Research, 69(3), 87–95.Google Scholar
  6. Boger, R., Richter, R., Paolucci, B., Whitmer, S. (1978, November). Parent as teacher: Perspective of function and context. Paper presented at the Parents as Educators Conference, National Institute of Education, Washington, DC. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 175 576 )Google Scholar
  7. Breiling, A. (1976). Using parents as teaching partners. Reading Teacher, 30(2), 187–192.Google Scholar
  8. Budd, R. W., Thorp, R. K. Donohew, L. (1967). Content analysis of communications. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  9. Cherry, C. (1966). On human communication: A review, a survey, and a criticism. ( 2nd ed. ). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  10. Collins, B. E., Raven, B. H. (1969). Group structure: Attraction, coalitions, communication, and power. In G. Lindzey E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology. (2nd ed.). Vol. 4. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  11. Combs, A. W. (1979). Myths in education—beliefs that hinder progress and their alternatives. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  12. Criscuolo, N. P. (1979). Activities that help involve parents in reading. Reading Teacher, 32 (4), 417–419.Google Scholar
  13. Della-Doro, D. (1979). Parents others citizens in curriculum development. In R. S. Brandt (Ed.), Partners: Parents Schools. Alexandria, Virginia: ASCD, 67–74.Google Scholar
  14. Dickerson, D., Spellman, C. R., Larsen, S., Tyler, L. (1973). Let the cards do the talking: A teacher-parent communication program. Teaching Exceptional Children, 5, 170–178.Google Scholar
  15. Dobson, R., Dobson, J. S. (1975). Parental and community involvement in education and teacher education. Washington, DC:Google Scholar
  16. ERIC Clearinghouse on Teacher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 100 833)Google Scholar
  17. Duncan, L. W. (1969). Parent-counselor conferences make a difference. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 031 743 )Google Scholar
  18. Edlund, C. V. (1969). Rewards at home to promote desirable school behavior. Teaching Exeptional Children, 1 (4), 121–127.Google Scholar
  19. Epstein, J. L. (1983, October). Effects on parents of teachers’ practices of parent involvement (Rept. No. 346 ). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of Schools.Google Scholar
  20. Epstein, J. L. McPartland, J. M. (1977). Family and school interactions and main effects on affective outcomes. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Center for the Study of Social Organization of Schools, Report No. 235. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 151 713 )Google Scholar
  21. Etheridge, G. W., Collins, T., Coats, B. (1979). Home-school relations: Together we stand or divided we fall. Paper presented at the International Congress on Education (2nd, Vancouver, British Columbia) (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 175 144 )Google Scholar
  22. Fairchild, T. N. (1976). Home-school token economies: Bridging the communication gap. Psychology in the Schools, 13 (4), 463–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Filipczak, J., Lordeman, A., Friedman, R. M. (April 1977). Parental involvement in the schools: Towards what end? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, NY. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 143 104 )Google Scholar
  24. Fischer, C. S., Jackson, R. M., Steuve, C. A., Gerson, K., Jones, L. M., Baldassare, M. (1977). Networks and places: Social relations in the urban setting. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  25. Futrell, M. H. (1983, November). President’s viewpoint: Parents as allies. NEA Today, p. 2.Google Scholar
  26. Gallup, G. H. (1980). The 12th annual Gallup poll of the public’s attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 62 (1), 3348.Google Scholar
  27. Gifford, I., Summerell, S. (1978). Interdisciplinary approach to failure prevention. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 185 510 )Google Scholar
  28. Gillum, R. M., Schooley, D. E., Novak, P. D. (April, 1977 ). The effects of parental involvement on student achievement in three Michigan performance contracting programs. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York City. ( ERIC Reproduction Service No. ED 144 007 )Google Scholar
  29. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  30. Gordon, I. J. (1979). The effects of parent involvement on schooling. In R. S. Brandt (Ed.), Partners: Parents and schools. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Google Scholar
  31. Gotts, E. E. (1967). Affect, language, and behavior control. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
  32. Gotts, E. E. (1979, December). Legislated roles of parent involvement and current school practices. Invited paper given at National Institute of Education Conference, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  33. Gotts, E. E. (1983a). Home-based early intervention. In A.W. Childs and G. B. Melton (Eds.), Rural Psychology, New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  34. Gotts, E. E. (1983b). Home communications needed. Alabama Community Education Parents and Learning News, 1(2), C-11.Google Scholar
  35. Gotts, E. E. (1983c, September). Parent involvement helps… Alabama Community Education Parents and Learning News, 1(2), C-7.Google Scholar
  36. Gotts, E. E. ( 1983d, April). School-home communications at the secondary level. Paper presented at the meeting of American Educational Research Association, Montreal.Google Scholar
  37. Gotts, E. E., Coan, D. L., Kenoyer, C. (1977). Developing instructional products for effective parenthood. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Convention. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 136 788 )Google Scholar
  38. Gotts, E. E. Paul, K. (1981). Manual for rating indirect parent interview. Revised. Charleston, WV: Appalachia Educational Laboratory.Google Scholar
  39. Gotts, E. E. Sattes, B. D. (1982). Interviews and coding procedures for assessing school-family communications. Charleston, WV: Appalachia Educational Laboratory.Google Scholar
  40. Gotts, E. E., Spriggs, A. M., Sattes, B. D. (1979). Review of major programs and activities in parenting. Charleston, WV: Appalachia Educational Laboratory, Inc. (Appears as an Appendix to ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 183 293 )Google Scholar
  41. Gotts, E. E., Spriggs, A. M., Snow, M. (1980). Childhood and parenting research program: Final report. Charleston, WV: Appalachia Educational Laboratory, Inc.Google Scholar
  42. Greene, J. (1972). Psycholinguistics, Chomsky and psychology. Baltimore, MD: Penguin.Google Scholar
  43. Hayes, E. J., Cunningham, G. K., Robinson, J. B. (1977). Counseling focus: Are parents necessary? Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 12(1), 8–14.Google Scholar
  44. Henderson, A. (Ed.) (1981). Parent participation—student achievement: The evidence grows. Columbia, MD: National Committee for Citizens in Education.Google Scholar
  45. Herman, J. J. (1972). Communication: The systems are all go. Clearing House, 46(6), 370–375.Google Scholar
  46. Hightower, H. J. (1978). Educational decision making: The involvement of parents: Myth or reality. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Toronto, Canada. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 154 086 )Google Scholar
  47. Hofmeister, A. M. (1977). The parent is a teacher. Paper presented at the 56th Annual Faculty Honor Lecture in the Humanities, Logan, Utah. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 161 541 )Google Scholar
  48. Hoskisson, K., Sherman, T. M., Smith, L. L. (1974). Assisted reading and parent involvement. The Reading Teacher, 27(7), 710–714.Google Scholar
  49. Hubbell, N. S. (1979). Some things change-some do not! In R. S. Brandt (Ed.), Partners: Parents schools. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Google Scholar
  50. Imber, S. C., Imber, R. B., Rothstein, G. (1979). Modifying independent work habits: An effective teacher-parent communication program. Exceptional Children, 46(3), 218–221.Google Scholar
  51. Ingram, J. E. (1978). The relationship between school-community relations and student achievement (Technical Report No. 463 ). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Individualized Schooling.Google Scholar
  52. Irvine, D. J., Flint, D. L., Hick, T. L., Horan, M. D., Kukuk, S. E., Fallon, E. (1979). Parent involvement affects children’s cognitive growth. Albany, NY: The University of the State of New York. ( Available from State Education Department, Division of Research, Albany, New York 12234 )Google Scholar
  53. Jason, L. A., Soucy, G. P. (1977). Home-letters as a technique in behavior management. Paper presented at the Midwestern Association of Behavior Analysis, Chicago. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 146 533 )Google Scholar
  54. Keeves, J. P. (1975). The home, the school, and achievement in mathematics and science. Science Education, 59 (4), 439–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kifer, E. (November, 1976 ). The relationship between the home and school in influencing the learning of children. Paper presented at the pre-convention Conference on Research of the National Council of English, Chicago. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 133 073 )Google Scholar
  56. Lahey, B., Gendrich, J., Gendrich, J., Schnelle, L., Gant, D., McNee, P. (1977). An evaluation of daily report cards with minimal teacher and parent contacts as an efficient method of classroom intervention. Behavior Modification, 1 (3), 381–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Leinhardt, S. (Ed.). (1977). Social networks: A developing paradigm. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  58. Lieu, W., Duff, R. W. (1972). The strength in weak ties. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 361–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lightfoot, S. L. (1978). Worlds apart. New York: Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar
  60. Lightfoot, S. L. (Spring, 1980 ). Exploring family-school relationships: A prelude to curricular designs and strategies. Paper prepared for “Toward Being At Home in School: Parent Involvement in Curriculum Decision Making.” Symposium sponsored by the American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  61. Mager, G. M. (1980). The conditions which influence a teacher in initiating contacts with parents. The Journal of Educational Research, 73(5), 276–282.Google Scholar
  62. McAfee, O. (1979). Parent education: Needed characteristics and necessary concerns. In Families and schools: Implementing parent education. Denver, Colorado: Education Commission of the States. (Available from ECS, Suite 300, 1860 Lincoln Street, Denver, CO 80295 )Google Scholar
  63. McKinney, J. A. (1975). The development and implementation of a tutorial program for parents to improve the reading and mathematics achievement of their children. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 113 703 )Google Scholar
  64. Mize, G. K. (1977). The influence of increased parental involvement in the educational process of their children. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning, Technical Report No. 418, ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 151 661 )Google Scholar
  65. Myers, E. J. (1971). Counseling the parents of sixth grade underachievers. Journal of Education, 154(1), 50–53.Google Scholar
  66. Naisbitt, J. (1982). Megatrends—ten new directions transforming our lives. New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar
  67. Nedler, S. E., McAfee, O.D. (1979). Working with parents: Guidelines for early childhood and elementary teachers. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  68. Parker, F. C., McCoy, J. F. (1977). School-based intervention for the modification of excessive absenteeism. Psychology in the Schools, 14(1), 84–88.Google Scholar
  69. Rich, D., VanDien, J., Mattox, B. (1979). Families as educators of their own children. In R. S. Brandt (Ed.), Partners: Parents and schools. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Google Scholar
  70. Schaefer, E. S. (1971). Toward a revolution in education. National Elementary Principal, 51(1), 18–25.Google Scholar
  71. Scheflen, A. E. (1978). Communicational concepts of schizophrenia. In M. E. Berger (Ed.), Beyond the double bind. Communication and family systems, theories, and techniques with schizophrenics. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  72. Seeley, D. S. (1981). Education through partnership: Mediating structures and education. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  73. Sheats, D., Sc Dunkleberger, G. E. (1979). A determination of the principal’s effect in school-initiated home contacts concerning attendance of elementary school students. The Journal of Educational Research,72(6), 310–312.Google Scholar
  74. Shelton, J., Dobson, R. L. (1973). An analysis of a family involvement-communication system in a Title I elementary school. Final Report, ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 082 091 )Google Scholar
  75. Smith, M. B., Brahce, C. I. (1963). When school and home focus on achievement. Educational Leadership, 20(5), 314–318.Google Scholar
  76. Snow, M. (1982). Characteristics of families with special needs in relations to schools. Charleston, WV: Appalachia Educational Laboratory.Google Scholar
  77. Spriggs, A. M. (June, 1980 ). Children and families in Appalachia: The status, needs and implications for R D Activities. Charleston, WV: Appalachia Educational Laboratory.Google Scholar
  78. Steinberg, L. I. (1979). The changing role of parent groups in educational decision making. In R. S. Brandt (Ed.), Partners: Parents and schools. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Google Scholar
  79. Stitley, R. P. (1978). Behavior contracts: A home-school cooperative effort. Peabody Journal of Education, 55 (4), 318–322.Google Scholar
  80. Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. New York: Bantam Books. Trovato, J., Bucher, B. (1980). Peer tutoring with or without home-based reinforcement, for reading remediation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13 (1), 129–141.Google Scholar
  81. Valentin, C. S., Alston, H. L. (July, 1978 ). Survey of parents’ expectations of public schools and aspirations for their children’s education. Project Report, Houston Independent School District. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 162 442 )Google Scholar
  82. Walberg, H. J., Marjoribanks, K. (1976). Family environment and cognitive development: Twelve analytic models. Review of Educational Research, 46(4), 527–551.Google Scholar
  83. Woods, C., Barnard, D. P., TeSelle, E. (1974). The effect of the parent involvement program on reading readiness scores. Prepared for Mesa Public Schools, Curriculum Center, Mesa, Arizona. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 104 527 )Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward Earl Gotts
    • 1
  • Richard F. Purnell
    • 2
  1. 1.Appalachia Educational LaboratoryCharlestonUSA
  2. 2.University of Rhode IslandKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations