Information Content of Prey Odor Plumes: What Do Foraging Leach’s Storm Petrels Know?

  • Larry Clark
  • Pankaj S. Shah

Abstract

Electrophysiological responses to odor have been recorded for concentrations as low as 0.01 ppm for Manx Shearwaters Puffinus puffinus and Black-footed Albatrosses Diomedea niaripes indicating that relative to most birds, procellariiforms have a keen sense of smell (Wenzel and Sieck 1972, cf. Clark 1991; Clark and Smeraski 1990; Clark and Mason 1989). Such acuity is not unexpected, given the extensive development of the olfactory anatomy of these species (Bang and Wenze 1986). Field observations indicate that Procellariiformes use their sense of smell to locate food (Grubb 1972; Hutchison and Wenzel 1980; Lequette, Verheyden and Jouventin 1989). However, it is not known how far from the source petrels can detect odors. This information would improve our understanding of procellariiform foraging ecology and engender a broader appreciation of the selective forces involved in shaping the evolution of the sensory anatomy of this group (Healy and Guilford 1990). Herein, we report preliminary observations on the odor sensitivity of Leach’s Storm Petrel Oceanodroma leucorhoa to the major components of natural prey items. The detection data are used to generate a first order estimate of the odor active space for free ranging petrels.

Keywords

Active Space Odor Plume Storm Petrel Turkey Vulture Night Vision Goggle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bang, B.G. and Wenzel, B.M. 1986. Nasal cavity and olfactory system. Pl. 195–225 in Form and function in birds, vol. 3 ( A.S. King and J. McLelland, Eds.). London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, W.J. and Carde, R.T. 1984. Chemical ecology of insects. Sunderland, MA, Sinauer Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Bent, A.C. 1963. Petrels and pelicans and their allies. New York, Dover. Brinton, E. 1967. Vertical migration and avoidance capability of euphausiids in the California current. Limnol. Oceanoqr. 12: 451–483.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, R.G.B. 1980. Seabirds as marine animals. Pp 1–39 in Behavior of marine animals. vol. 4, Marine birds (J. Burger, B.L. 011a and H.E. Winn, Eds). New York, Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, L. 1991. Odor detection thresholds in tree swallows and cedar waxwings. Auk 108: 177–180.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, L. and Mason, J.R. 1989. Sensitivity of brown-headed cowbirds to volatiles. Condor 91: 922–932.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, L. and Smeraski, C.A. 1990. Seasonal shifts in odor acuity by starlings. J. Exp. Zool. 177:673–680.Google Scholar
  8. Everson, I. 1984. Marine Zooplankton. in Pp.463–490. Antarctic Ecology vol. 2, R.M. Laws (Ed.) New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fleischer, M.T. 1980. Spills: an evaFortation/air dispersion model for chemical spills. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service PB83–109470.Google Scholar
  10. Grubb, T.C. 1972. Smell and foraging in shearwaters and petrels. Nature, Lond. 237: 404–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Healy, S. and Guilford, T. 1990. Olfactory bulb size and nocturnality in birds. Evolution.Google Scholar
  12. Hutchison, L.V. and Wenzel, B.M. 1980. Olfactory guidance in foraging by Procellariiformes. Condor 82: 314–319.Google Scholar
  13. Kawaguchi, K. 1969. (Diurnal vertical migration of macronektonic fish in the western North Pacific]. Bull Plankton Soc. Japan 16: 63–66.Google Scholar
  14. Kubtoa, K., Uchida, C. Kurosawa, K., Komuro, A. and Kobayashi, A. 1989. Identification and formation of characteristic volatile compounds from cooked shrimp. P 376–385. in Thermal generation of aromas (T.H. Parli-ment, R.J. McGorrin, and C.-T. Ho, Eds). ACS Sym. Ser. 409, Wash. D.C.Google Scholar
  15. Kubota, K. and Kobayashi, A. 1988. Identification of unknown methyl ketones in volatile flavor components from cooked small shrimp. J. Agric. Food Chem. 36:121–123.Google Scholar
  16. Lequette, B., Verheyden, C. and Jouventin, P. 1989. Olfaction in subantarctic seabirds: its phylogenetic and ecological significance. Condor 91: 732–735.Google Scholar
  17. Mozell, M.M., Sheehe, P.R., Swieck, S.W.,Jr., Kurtz, D.B. and Hornung, D.E. 1984. A parametric study of the stimulation variables affecting the magnitude of the olfactory nerve response. J. Gen. Phvsiol. 83: 233–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Murano, M. Marumo, R., Nemoto, T. and Aizawa, Y. 1976. Vertical distribution of biomass of plankton and micronekton in Kuroshio water off central Japan. Bull. Plankton Soc. Japan 23: 1–12.Google Scholar
  19. Reid, R.C., Prausnitz, J.M. and Poling, B.E. 1986. The properties of gases and liquids. New York. McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Sekiguchi, H. 1975. Seasonal and ontogenetic vertical migrations in some common copepods in the norther region of the North Pacific. Bull. Fac. Fish., Mie Univ. 2: 29–38.Google Scholar
  21. Shallenberger, R.J. 1973. Breeding biology, homing behavior and communication patterns of the wedged-tailed shearwater Puffinus pacificus. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  22. Smith, S.A. and Paselk, R.A. 1986. Olfactory sensitivity of the turkey vulture (Cathartes aura) to three carrion-associated odorants. Auk 103: 586–592.Google Scholar
  23. Waldvogel, J.A. 1987. Olfactory navigation in homing pigeons: are the current models atmospherically realistic? Auk 104: 369–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Watanuki, Y. 1985. Food of breeding Leach’s storm petrels (Oceanodroma leucorhoa). Auk 102: 884–886.Google Scholar
  25. Wenzel, B.M. and Sieck, M.H. 1972. O1:`actory perception and bulbar electri- cal activity in several avian species. Physiol. Behay. 9:287–293.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Larry Clark
    • 1
  • Pankaj S. Shah
    • 2
  1. 1.Monell Chemical Senses CenterUSDA/APHIS/S&T/Denver WiLdlife Research CenterPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Monell Chemical Senses CenterPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations