Transmitter Release in Aplysia: Applicability of Quantal Models and Evidence for Postsynaptic Control

  • Daniel Gardner

Abstract

The use of molluscan ganglia for neurobiological studies combines multiple technical advantages with demonstrated versatility. These benefits derive not only from the accessibility of individual neurons, and consequent ease of study, but also from the network properties of these neuronal arrays. A well-recognized advantage is that many molluscan neurons are distinct individuals. As a consequence, using criteria such as shape, size, position, electrophysiology and connectivity, molluscan neurons in several species have been identified. The use of identified cells permits incrementally assembling a library of specific information by the repeated study of the same cell in successive preparations. It further permits examination of those specific features which distinguish individual neurons, rather than studying only those general properties which are common to classes of similar cells. Similarly, specific network properties which characterize interconnections of identified cells may be used to examine or contrast particular elements, permitting analyses not available in such systems as cultured cell lines, chromaffin cells, or synaptosomes.

Keywords

Transmitter Release Synaptic Strength Postsynaptic Neuron American Physiological Society Synaptic Conductance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Poulain B, Tauc L, Maisey EA, Wadsworth JDF, Mohan PM, Dolly JO. Neurotransmitter release is blocked intracellularly by botulinum neurotoxin, and this requires uptake of both toxin polypeptides by a process mediated by the larger chain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988; 85: 4090–4094.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Poulain B, Mochida S, Weller U, Högy B, Habermann E, Wadsworth JDF, Shone C, Dolly JO, Tauc L. Heterologous combinations of heavy and light chains from botulinum neurotoxin A and tetanus toxin inhibit neurotransmitter release in Aplysia. J Biol Chem 1991; 266: 9580–9585.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Strumwasser F. Types of information stored in single neurons. In: Wiersma CAG, ed. Invertebrate Nervous Systems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967: 291–319.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gardner D. Bilateral symmetry and interneuronal organization in the buccal ganglia of Aplysia. Science 1971; 173: 550–553.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gardner D, Kandel ER. Diphasic post-synaptic potential: a chemical synapse capable of mediating conjoint excitation and inhibition. Science 1972; 176: 675–678.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gardner D, Kandel ER. Physiological and kinetic properties of cholinergic receptors activated by multi-action intemeurons in the buccal ganglia of Aplysia. J Neurophysiol 1977; 40: 333–348.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tauc L, Hoffmann A, Tsuji S, Hinzen DH, Faille L. Transmission abolished on a cholinergic synapse after injection of acetylcholinesterase into the presynaptic neurone. Nature 1974; 250: 496–498.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gardner D. Voltage-clamp analysis of a self-inhibitory synaptic potential in the buccal ganglia of Aplysia. J Physiol (London) 1977; 264: 893–920.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    White RL, Gardner D. Self-inhibition alters firing patterns of neurons in Aplysia buccal ganglia. Brain Res 1981; 209: 77–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baux G, Tauc L. Presynaptic actions of curare and atropine on quantal acetylcholine release at a central synapse of Aplysia. J Physiol (London) 1987; 388: 665–680.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baux G, Fossier P, Tauc L. Histamine and FLRFamide regulate acetylcholine release at an identified synapse in Aplysia in opposite ways. J Physiol (London) 1990; 429: 147–168.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gardner D, Stevens CF. Rate-limiting step of inhibitory post-synaptic current decay in Aplysia buccal ganglia. J Physiol (London) 1980; 304: 145–164.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gardner D. Time integral of synaptic conductance. J Physiol (London) 1980; 304: 181–191.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Simonneau M, Tauc L, Baux G. Quantal release of acetylcholine examined by current fluctuation analysis at an identified neuro-neuronal synapse of Aplysia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1980; 77: 1661 1665.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gardner D. Paired individual and mean postsynaptic currents recorded in four-cell networks of Aplysia. J Neurophysiol 1990; 63: 1226–1240.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gardner D. Sets of synaptic currents paired by common presynaptic or postsynaptic neurons. J Neurophysiol 1989; 61: 845–853.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gardner D. Membrane-potential effects on an inhibitory post-synaptic conductance in Aplysia buccal ganglia. J Physiol (London) 1980; 304: 165–180.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Del Castillo J, Katz B. Quantal components of the end-plate potential. J Physiol (London) 1980; 124: 560–573.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bekkers JM, Stevens CF. Presynaptic mechanism for long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature 1990; 346: 724–729.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Malinow R, Tsien RW. Presynaptic enhancement shown by whole-cell recordings of long-term potentiation in hippocampal slices. Nature 1990; 346: 177–180.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Redman S. Quantal analysis of synaptic potentials in neurons cf the central nervous system. Physiol Rev 1990; 70: 165–198.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gardner D. Presynaptic transmitter release is specified by postsynaptic neurons of Aplysia buccal ganglia. J Neurophysiol 1991; 66: 2150–2154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Simonneau M, Taue L. Properties of miniature postsynaptic currents during depolarization-induced release at a cholinergic neuroneuronal synapse. Cell Molec Neurobiol 1987; 7: 175–189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gardner D. Static Determinants of Synaptic Strength. In: Gardner D, ed. The Neurobiology of Neural Networks. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993 in press.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Faber DS, Korn H. Applicability of the coefficient of variation method for analyzing synaptic plasticity. Biophys J 1991; 60: 1288–1294.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Korn H, Faber DS. Quantal analysis and synaptic efficacy in the CNS. Trends in Neurosci 1991; 14: 439–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Gardner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physiology and Biophysics, and Department of NeuroscienceCornell University Medical CollegeNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations