Characterization of Mutants of TrichodermaHarzianum with Altered Antibiotic Production Characteristics

  • J. L. Faull
  • K. Graeme-Cook
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 230)

Abstract

The use of Trichoderma harzianum as a biological control agent has achieved satisfactory disease control in sterile composts (Locke et al., 1985), and in solarised soils (Katan, 1981), but in broad acre agriculture its use has met with variable success (Papavizas, 1987). The limitations of Trichoderma as a biological control agent in natural soils include its susceptibility to competition by other soil organisms, particularly Pseudomonas (Hubbard et al., 1983), poor root colonization ability (Ahmad and Baker, 1987), and a tendency to miss the “window of opportunity” in colonizing newly emerging plant roots (Harman and Lumsden, 1990).

Keywords

Biological Control Biological Control Agent Soil Test Protoplast Fusion Antibiotic Production 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Ahmad, J. S., and Baker, R., 1987, Rhizosphere competance of Trichoderma harzianum, Phytopathology, 77: 182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Faull, J. L., 1988, Competitive antagonism of soil-borne plant pathogens, pages 125–140, in: Fungi in Biological Control Systems, M. Burge, ed., Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Graeme-Cook, K., and Faull, J. L., 1991, Effect of UV-induced mutants of Trichoderma harzianum with altered antibiotic production on selected pathogens in vitro, Can. J. Microbiol., (in press).Google Scholar
  4. Harman, G. E., and Lumsden, R. D., 1990, Biological disease control, pages 259–280, in: The Rhizosphere, J. Lynch, ed., Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Herrera-Estrella, A., Goldman, G. H., and Van Montague, M., 1990, High efficiency transformation system for the biocontrol agent Trichoderma spp., Mol. Micro., 4: 839.Google Scholar
  6. Hubbard, J. P., Harman, G. E., and Hadar, Y., 1983, Effect of soil-borne Pseudomonas spp. on the biological control agent Trichoderma hamatum on pea seeds, Phytopathology, 73: 655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Katan, J., 1981, Solar heating (solarization) of soil for control of soil-borne pests,Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 19: 211.Google Scholar
  8. Locke, J. C., Marois, J. J., and Papavizas, G. C., 1985, Biological control of Fusarium wilt of greenhouse-grown chrysanthemums, Plant Dis., 69: 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Papavizas, G. C., 1987, Genetic manipulation to improve the effectiveness of biocontrol fungi for plant disease control, in: Innovative Approaches to Plant Disease Control, I. Chet, ed., Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Papavizas, G. C., and Lewis, J. A., 1983, Physiological and biocontrol characteristics of stable mutants of Trichoderma viride resistant to MBC fungicides, Phytopathology, 73: 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Statz, T. E., and Harman, G. E., 1990, Non-parental progeny resulting from protoplast fusion of Trichoderma harzianum, Exp. Mycol., 14: 145.Google Scholar
  12. Statz, T. E., Weeden, N. F., and Harman, G. E., 1988, Methods of isoenzyme electrophoresis for Trichoderma and Gliocladium species, Mycologia, 80: 870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Whipps, J. M., 1987, Effect of media on growth and interactions between a range of soil-borne glasshouse pathogens and antagonistic fungi, New Phytol., 107: 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. L. Faull
    • 1
  • K. Graeme-Cook
    • 1
  1. 1.Biology DepartmentBirkbeck CollegeLondonUK

Personalised recommendations