A Cognitive Processing Formulation of Posttrauma Reactions

  • Mark Creamer
Part of the The Plenum Series on Stress and Coping book series (SSSO)

Abstract

In recent years, considerable interest has been directed toward cognitive processing theories of posttrauma reactions. Such conceptualizations are attractive, since they attempt to explain the underlying mechanisms rather than to replace existing models. From a cultural perspective of trauma, cognitive processing models are perhaps especially appealing. Such an approach may help to explain the interrelationships between cultural and social variables, on the one hand, and individual behavior and experience, on the other. The way in which a potentially traumatic event is appraised and interpreted may be largely influenced by cultural expectations and norms; what is traumatic for one culture may not be so for another. During the recovery phase, cultural rituals, attitudes, and expectations may facilitate or impair the survivor’s ability to process, or come to terms with, the experience.

Keywords

Cognitive Processing Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Level Intrusive Thought Global Severity Index 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.; DSM-III-R). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Beck, A. T., & Emery, G. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. Chaplin, E. W. & Levine, B. A. (1980). The effects of total exposure duration and inter- rupted versus continuous exposure of flooding. Behavior Therapy, 12, 360–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chemtob, C., Roitblat, H. L., Hamada, R. S., Carlson, J. G., & Twentyman, C. T. (1988). A cognitive action theory of posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 2, 253–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Creamer, M., Burgess, P., Buckingham, W. J Sc Pattison, P. (1989). The psychological aftermath of the Queen Street shootings. Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  6. Creamer, M., Burgess, P., & Pattison, P. (1990). Cognitive processing in post-trauma reactions: Some preliminary findings. Psychological Medicine, 20, 597–604.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Creamer, M. Buckingham, W. J., & Burgess, P. (1991). A community based mental health response to a multiple shooting. Australian Psychologist, 26, 2.Google Scholar
  8. Creamer, M., Burgess, P., Pattison, P. (1992). Reaction to trauma: A cognitive processing model. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 452–459.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Derogatis, L. (1977). SCL-90–1? Version: Manual-1. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Foa, E. B., Steketee, G., & Rothbaum, B. O. (1989). Behavioral-cognitive conceptualizations of posttraumatic stress disorder. Behavior Therapy, 20, 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foa, E. B., Rothbaum, B. O., Riggs, D. S., & Murdock, T. B. (1991). Treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder in rape victims: A comparison between cognitive-behavioral treatments and counselling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 715–723.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foy, D. W., Carroll, E. M., & Donahue, C. P. (1987). Etiological factors in the development of PTSD in clinical samples of Vietnam combat veterans. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 17–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Green, B. L. (1982). Assessing levels of psychological impairment following disaster: Consideration of actual and methodological dimensions. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 170, 544–552.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Green, B. I Wilson, J. P., & Lindy, J D. (1985). Conceptualizing posttraumatic stress disorder: A psychosocial framework. In C. Figley (Ed.), Trauma and its wake (Vol. 1). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  15. Hollon, S. I)., & Kriss, M. R. (1984). Cognitive factors in clinical research and practice. Clinical Psychology Review, 4, 35–76.Google Scholar
  16. Horowitz, M. J. (1973). Phase orientated treatment of stress response syndromes. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 27, 506–515.Google Scholar
  17. Horowitz, M. J. (1986). Stress response syndromes ( 2nd ed. ). New York: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  18. Horowitz, M. J., Wilner, N., & Alvarez, W. (1979). The Impact of Events Scale: A measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 41, 209–218.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Janoff-Bulman, R. (1985). The aftermath of victimization: Rebuilding shattered assumptions. In C. Figley (Ed.), Trauma and its wake (Vol. 1 ). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  20. Jöreskog, K. G. (1978). Structural analysis of covariance and correlation and matrices. Psychometrika, 43, 443–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1986). Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. University of Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
  22. Kilpatrick, D. G., Saunders, B., Amick-McMullan, A. E., Best, C. L., Veronen, L. J., & Resnick, H. (1989). Victim and crime factors associated with the development of posttraumatic stress disorder. Behavior Therapy, 20, 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kolb, L. C. (1987). A neuropsychological hypothesis explaining posttraumatic stress disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 989–995.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lang, P. J. (1977). Imagery in therapy: An information processing analysis of fear. Behavior Therapy, 8, 862–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lang, P. J. (1985). The cognitive psychophysiology of emotion: Fear and anxiety. In A. H. Tuma & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorder. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Litz, B. T., & Keane, T. M. (1989). Information processing in anxiety disorders: Application to the understanding of posttraumatic stress disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 9, 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Long, J. S. (1983). Covariance structure models: An introduction to LISREL. Beverly Hills and London: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Rabavilas, A. D., Boulougouris, J. C., & Stefanis, C. (1976). Duration of flooding sessions in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive patients. Behavior Research and Therapy, 14, 349–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schwartz, L. S. (1990). A biopsychosocial treatment approach to posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 3, 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stern, R. S., & Marks, I. M. (1973). Brief and prolonged flooding: A comparison in agoraphobic patients. Archives of General Psychiatry, 28, 270–276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilson, J. P. (1989). Trauma, transformation and healing. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  32. Zilberg, N. J., Weiss, D. S., & Horowitz, M. J. (1982). The Impact of Events Scale: A cross validation study and some empirical evidence supporting a conceptual model of stress response syndromes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 407–414.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Creamer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations