Grandparents as Support and Socialization Agents

  • Barbara R. Tinsley
  • Ross D. Parke
Part of the Genesis of Behavior book series (GOBE, volume 4)

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an expansion of our views of the cast of individuals who influence the socialization of infants and children. Over the past decade, we have watched a shift away from an exclusive focus on the mother-child dyad as the primary unit of analysis. During the 1970s, the father came to be portrayed as an active and competent contributor to infant caregiving and development (Lamb, 1976; Parke & O’Leary, 1976; Pedersen & Robson, 1969), and by the end of the decade, the father-mother-child triad was beginning to receive the attention that it deserved—both theoretically (Lewis, 1979; Lewis & Weinraub, 1976; Parke, Power, & Gottman, 1979) and empirically (Belsky, 1980; Pedersen, 1980). Families, in turn, were increasingly recognized as functioning within a variety of other social systems, including both formal and in?formal support systems, as well as cultural systems (Bronfenbrenner, 1979; Cochran & Brassard, 1979; Parke & Lewis, 1981). Currently, we are attempting to move beyond the recognition of this embeddedness of families and to begin to delineate (1) the links between these social systems; (2) the functions that different systems play; and (3) the impact of variations in the amount and the quality of contact on family functioning and child development.

Keywords

Social Network Child Development Family Functioning Adult Child Nuclear Family 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abernathy, V. Social network and response to the maternal role. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 1973, 3, 86–92.Google Scholar
  2. Abrahams, B., Feldman, S. S., & Nash, S. C. Sex role self-concept and sex role attitudes: Enduring personality characterisitics on adaptations to changing life situations ? Developmental Psychology, 1978, 14, 393–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams, B. N. Structural factors affecting parental aid to married children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, August 1964, pp. 327–331.Google Scholar
  4. Adams, B. N. Kinship systems and adaptation to modernization. Studies in Comparative International Development, 1968, 4, 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Adams, B. N. Isolation, function, and beyond. American kinship in the 60’s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1970, 32, 575–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alan Guttmacher Institute. 11 million teenagers: What can be done about the epidemic of adolescent pregnancies in the U.S. New York: Planned Parenthood Federation of America, 1976.Google Scholar
  7. Albrecht, R. The parental responsibilities of grandparents. Marriage and Family Living, 1954, 16, 201–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Asher, S. R., & Gottman, J. M. (Eds.). The development of children’s friendships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  9. Atchley, R. C. The social faces in later life: An introduction to social gerontology. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1972.Google Scholar
  10. Badger, E., Burns, D., & Vietze, P. Maternal risk factors as predictors of developmental outcome in early childhood. Infant Mental Health Journal, 1981, 2, 34–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Belsky, J. Mother—father—infant interaction: A naturalistic observational study. Developmental Psychology, 1979, 15, 601–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Belsky, J. Child maltreatment: An ecological integration. American Psychologist, 1980, 35, 320–335.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Belsky, J. Early human experience: A family perspective. Developmental Psychology, 1981, 17, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Belsky, J., & Tolan, W. J. Infants as producers of their own development: An ecological analysis. In: R. M. Lerner and N. A. Busch-Rossnagel (Eds.), Individuals as producers of their own development: A life span perspective. New York: Academic Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  15. Bengston, V. L., & Cutler, N. E. Generations and intergenerational relations: Perspectives on age groups and social change. In: R. Benstock and E. Shanas (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences. New York: Von Nostrand Reinhold, 1976.Google Scholar
  16. Berger, M., & Fowlkes, M. A. Family intervention project: A family network model for serving young handicapped children. Young Children, 1980, 51, 188–198.Google Scholar
  17. Berghorn, F. J., Schafer, D. E., Steeve, G. H., & Wiseman, R. F. The urban elderly: A study of life satisfaction. Montclair, N.J.: Allenheld Osmon, 1977.Google Scholar
  18. Bittman, S., & Zalk, S. R. Expectant fathers. New York: Hawthorn Books, 1978. Blumberg, L., & Bell, R. R. Urban migration and kinship ties. Social Problems, 1959, 6, 328–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bradley, R. H., & Caldwell, B. M. The relation of infants’ home environments to mental test performance at fifty-four months: A follow-up study. Child Development, 1976, 47, 1172–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bronfenbrenner, U. The changing American family. In: E. M. Hetherington and R. D. Parke (Eds.), Contemporary readings in child psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1977.Google Scholar
  21. Bronfenbrenner, U. The ecology of human development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  22. Brown, J. S., Schwarzweller, H. K., & Magalam, J. J. Kentucky mountain migration and the stem family: An American variation on a theme by Le Play. Rural Sociology, 1963, 28, 48–69.Google Scholar
  23. Cherlin, A. J. Marriage, divorce, remarriage. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  24. Clark, M. Cultural values and dependency in later life. In: R. Kalish (Ed.), The dependencies of old people. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Institute of Gerontology, 1969.Google Scholar
  25. Clarke-Stewart, K. A. The father’s contribution to children’s cognitive and social development in early childhood. In: F. Pedersen (Ed.), The father—infant relationship. New York: Praeger, 1980.Google Scholar
  26. Cochran, M. M. and Brassard, J. A. Child development and personal social networks. Child Development, 1979, 50, 601–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cohler, B. J., & Grunebaum, H. V. Mothers, grandmothers, and daughters: Personality and childcare in three-generation families. New York: Wiley, 1981.Google Scholar
  28. Cohler, B. J., Grunebaum, H. V., Weiss, J. C., & Moran, D. L. The childcare attitudes of two generations of mothers. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 1971, 17, 3–18.Google Scholar
  29. Crockenberg, S. B. Infant irritability, mother responsiveness, and social support influences on the security of infant-mother attachment. Child Development, 1981, 52, 857–865.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Croog, S. H., Lipson, A., & Levine, S. Help patterns in severe illness: The roles of kin network, non-family resources and institutions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1972, 34, 32–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Daniels, P., & Weingarten, K. Sooner or later: The timing of parenthood in adult lives. New York: W. W. Norton, 1982.Google Scholar
  32. Dunn, J., & Kendrick, C. Siblings. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  33. Edwards, C. P., & Lewis, M. Children’s concepts of social relations: Social functions and social objects. In: M. Lewis and L. A. Rosenblum (Eds.), The child and its family. New York: Plenum Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  34. Elardo, R., Bradley, R., & Caldwell, B. The relation of infants’ home environments to mental test performance from six to thirty-six months: A longitudinal analysis. Child Development, 1975, 46, 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Elder, G. H. Family history and the life course. Journal of Family History (Vol. 1–2 ), 1976, 77, 279–304.Google Scholar
  36. Elder, G. H. Approaches to social change and the family. American Journal of Sociology, 1978, 84, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Elder, G., & Rockwell, R. The life course and human development: An ecological perspective. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1979, 2, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Feldman, S. S., & Nash, S. C. Interest in babies during young adulthood. Child Development, 1978, 49, 617–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Feldman, S. S., & Nash, S. C. Sex differences in responsiveness to babies among mature adults. Developmental Psychology, 1979, 15, 430–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Feldman, S. S., Nash, S. C., & Cutrona, C. The influence of age and sex on responsiveness to babies. Developmental Psychology, 1977, 13, 675–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Feldman, S. S., Bingen, Z. C., & Nash, S. C. Fluctuations of sex-rated self-attributions as a function of stage of family life cycle. Developmental Psychology, 1981, 17, 24–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Field, T. M., Widmayer, S. M., Stringer, S., & Ignatoff, E. Teenage, lower class, black mothers and their preterm infants: An intervention and developmental follow-up. Child Development, 1980, 51, 426–436.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. French, J. R. P., Jr., Rogers, W. L., & Cobb, S. Adjustment as person-environment fit. In: G. Coelho, D. Hamberg, and J. Adams (Eds.), Coping and adaptation. New York: Basic Books, 1974.Google Scholar
  44. Furstenberg, F. F. Remarriage and intergenerational relations. In: R. Fogel, E. Hatfield, S. Kiesler, and J. March (Eds.), Aging: Stability and change in the family. New York: Academic Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  45. Gallas, H. B. (Eds.). Teenage parenting: Social determinants and consequences. Introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 1980, 36, 1–6.Google Scholar
  46. Galper, A., Seefeldt, C., Jantz, R. K., & Serock, K. Children’s concept of age. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 1980, 12, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Garbarino, J., & Gilliam, G. Understanding abusive families. Lexington, Mass.: Heath, 1980. Gibson, G. Kin family network: Overheralded structure in past conceptualizations of family functioning. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1972, 34, 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gifford, R., & Black, D. The grandchild-grandparent dyad: Ritual or relationship? Paper presented at the 25th annual meeting of the Gerontological Society, San Juan, Puerto Rico, December 1972.Google Scholar
  49. Glick, P. C. The future of the American family. Current Population Reports,1979, Series P23, No. 78.Google Scholar
  50. Goldberg, W. A. Marital quality and child-mother, child father attachments. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Conference on Infant Studies, Austin, Texas, 1982.Google Scholar
  51. Gordon, M., & Knoll, C. E. Social class and interaction with kin and friends. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 1975, 6, 239–248.Google Scholar
  52. Hagestad, G. O. Parent and child: Generations in the family. In: T. M. Field, A. Huston, H. C. Quay, L. Troll, and G. E. Finley (Eds.), Review of human development. New York: Wiley, 1982.Google Scholar
  53. Hagestad, G. O., & Speicher, J. L. Grandparents and family influence: Views of three generations. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston, April 1981.Google Scholar
  54. Hardy, J. B., King, T. M., Shipp, D. A., & Welcher, D. W. A comprehensive approach to adolescent pregnancy. In: K. G. Scott, T. F. Field, and E. Robertson (Eds.), Teenage parents and their offspring. New York: Crune and Stratton, 1981.Google Scholar
  55. Hare-Mustin, R. T. Myth and assertions about the family. American Psychologist, 1981, 36, 312–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hareven, T. K. Family time and historical time. Daedalus, 1977, 106, 57–70.Google Scholar
  57. Havighurst, R. J. History of developmental psychology: Socialization and personality development through the life span. In: P. B. Baltes and K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology. New York: Academic Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  58. Hentig, H. V. The sociological function of the grandmother. Social Forces, 1946, 24, 389–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hess, B. B., & Waring, J. M. Parent and child in later life. Rethinking the relationship. In: R. M. Lerner and G. B. Spanier (Eds.), Child influences on marital and family interaction: A life span perspective. New York: Academic Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  60. Hetherington, E. M., Cox, M., & Cox, R. The aftermath of divorce. In: J. H. Stevens, Jr., & M. Matthew (Eds.), Mother-child, father-child relations. Washington, D.C.: National Association for the Education of Young Children, 1978.Google Scholar
  61. Hickey, T. H., Hickey, L. A., & Kalish, R. A. Children’s perceptions of the elderly. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1968, 112, 227–235.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Hill, R., Foote, N., Aldous, J., Carlson, R., & MacDonald, R. Family development in three generations: A longitudinal study of changing family patterns of planning and achievement. Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman, 1970.Google Scholar
  63. Jordan, V. B. Conserving kinship concepts: A developmental study in social cognition. Child Development, 1980, 51, 146–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kahana, B., & Kahana, E. Grandparenthood from the perspective of the developing grandchild. Developmental Psychology, 1970, 3, 98–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kahana, E., & Kahana, B. Theoretical and research perspectives on grandparenthood. Aging and Human Development, 1971, 2, 261–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kahn, R. L., & Antonucci, T. C. Convoys over the life course: Attachment, roles, and social support. In: P. B. Baltes and O. G. Brim, Jr. (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior (Vol. 3 ). New York: Academic Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  67. Kellam, S. G., Ensminger, M. E., & Turner, J. Family structure and the mental health of children. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1977, 34, 1012–1022.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Klaus, M. H., & Kennell, J. H. Parent-infant bonding ( 2nd ed. ). St. Louis: Mosby, 1981.Google Scholar
  69. Komarovsky, M. Blue-collar marriage. New York: Vintage Books, 1967.Google Scholar
  70. Kornhaber, A., & Woodward, K. L. Grandparents/grandchild: The vital connection. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  71. Lamb, M. E. The role of the father: An overview. In: M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development. New York: Wiley, 1976.Google Scholar
  72. Lamb, M. E. Paternal influences and the father’s role: A personal perspective. American Psychologist, 1979, 34, 938–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lamb, M. E. (Ed.). The role of the father in child development ( 2nd ed. ). New York: Wiley, 1981.Google Scholar
  74. Laslett, P. Characteristics of the Western family considered over time. Journal of Family History, 1976–1977, 12, 89–115.Google Scholar
  75. Lee, G. R. Effects of social networks on the family. In: W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, and I. L. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family, Vol. 1: Research-based theories. New York: Free Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  76. Lee, G. R. Kinship in the seventies: A decade review of research and theory. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1980, 42, 923–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Lewis, M. The social network systems model: Toward a theory of social development. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Philadelphia, April 1979.Google Scholar
  78. Lewis, M. The social network systems model: Toward a theory of social development. In: T. M. Field, A. Huston, H. C. Quay, L. Troll, and G. E. Finely (Eds.), Review of human development. New York: Wiley, 1982.Google Scholar
  79. Lewis, M., & Feiring, C. Direct and indirect interactions in social relationships. In: L. Lipsitt (Ed.), Advances in infancy research (Vol. 1 ). New York: Ablex, 1981.Google Scholar
  80. Lewis, M., & Rosenblum, L. A. (Eds.). The effect of the infant on its caregiver. New York: Wiley, 1974.Google Scholar
  81. Lewis, M. E., & Weinraub, M. The father’s role in the infant’s social network. In: M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development. New York: Wiley, 1976.Google Scholar
  82. Lieberman, A. F. Preschoolers competence with a peer: Influence of attachment and social experience. Child Development, 1977, 48, 1277–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Litwak, E., & Szeleniji, I. Primary group structures and their functions: Kin, neighbors and friends. American Sociological Review, 1969, 34, 465–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Matas, L., Arend, R. A., & Sroufe, L. A. Continuity in adaptation: Quality of attachment and later competence. Child Development, 1978, 49, 547–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Main, M. Exploration, play and level of cognitive functioning as related to child-mother attachment. Unpublished dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, 1973.Google Scholar
  86. Main, M., & Weston, D. R. The quality of the toddler’s relationship to mother and father: Related to conflict behavior and the readiness to establish new relationships. Child Development, 1981, 52, 932–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Mills, L. A., & Cairns, R. B. Life satisfaction and grandparenting in low income elderly black women. Paper presented at the biannual meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston, April 1981.Google Scholar
  88. Minturn, L. A., & Lambert, W. W. Mothers of six cultures: Antecedents of child-rearing. New York: Wiley, 1964.Google Scholar
  89. Mogey, J. Residence, family kinship, some recent research. Journal of Family History, 1977, 12, 95–105.Google Scholar
  90. Neugarten, B. L., & Moore, J. W. The changing age status systems. In: B. L. Neugarten (Ed.), Middle age and aging. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  91. Neugarten, B. L., & Weinstein, K. K. The changing American grandparent. Journal of Marriage and the Family, May, 1964, 26, 199–204.Google Scholar
  92. Nimkoff, M. F. Changing family relationships of older people in the U.S. during the last fifty years. The Gerontologist, 1961, 1, 92–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Olds, D. L. The prenatal/early infant project: An ecological approach to prevention. In: J. Belsky (Ed.), In the beginning: Readings in infancy. New York: Columbia University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  94. Parke, R. D. Interactional designs. In: R. B. Cairns (Ed.), The analysis of social interactions: Methods, issues and illustrations. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1979.Google Scholar
  95. Parke, R. D. Fathers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  96. Parke, R. D. Theoretical models of child abuse: Their implications for prediction, prevention and modification. In: R. Starr (Ed.), Prediction of abuse. New York: Ballinger, 1981.Google Scholar
  97. Parke, R. D., & Collmer, C. W. Child abuse: An interdisciplinary analysis. In: E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Review of child development research (Vol. 5 ). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  98. Parke, R. D., & Lewis, N. G. The family in context: A multi-level interactional analysis of child abuse. In: R. W. Henderson (Ed.), Parent-child interaction: Theory, research and prospect. New York: Academic Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  99. Parke, R. D., & O’Leary, S. Family interaction in the newborn period: Some findings, some observations, and some unresolved issues. In: K. Riegel and J. Meacham (Eds.), The developing individual in a changing world, Vol. 2: Social and environmental issues. The Hague: Mouton, 1976.Google Scholar
  100. Parke, R. D., & Tinsley, B. R. The early environment of the at-risk infant: Expanding the social context. In: D. Bricker (Ed.), Intervention with at-risk and handicapped infants: From research to application. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  101. Parke, R. D., Power, T. G., & Gottman, J. M. Conceptualizing and quantifying influence patterns in the family triad. In: M. E. Lamb, S. J. Suomi, and G. R. Stephenson (Eds.), Social interaction analysis: Methodological issues. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  102. Parsons, T. The kinship system of the contemporary United States. American Anthropologist, 1943, 45, 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Parsons, T. The kinship system in the contemporary U. S. In: Essays in sociological theory. Chicago: Free Press, 1954.Google Scholar
  104. Pascoe, J. M., Loda, F. A., Jeffries, V., & Earp, J. A. The association between mothers’ social support and provision of stimulation to their children. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 1981, 2, 15–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1978, 19, 2–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Pedersen, F. A. (Ed.). The father-infant relationship: Observational studies in the family setting. New York: Praeger Special Studies, 1980.Google Scholar
  107. Pedersen, F. A. Father influences viewed in a family context. In: M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley, 1982.Google Scholar
  108. Pedersen, F. A., & Robson, K. S. Father participation in infancy. American Journal of Orthopsychiarty, 1969, 39, 466–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Powell, D. R. Family-environment relations and early child rearing. The role of social networks and neighborhoods. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 1979, 13, 1–11.Google Scholar
  110. Power, T. G., & Parke, R. D. Play as a context for early learning: Lab and home analysis. In: I. E. Sigel and L. M. Laosa (Eds.), The family as a learning environment. New York: Plenum Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  111. Reiss, D. The family’s construction of reality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  112. Riegel, K. F., Riegel, R. M., & Meyer, G. A. Study of the drop-out rates in longitudinal research on aging and the prediction of death. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 5, 342–348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Robertson, J. F. Interaction in three generation families, parents as mediators: Toward a theoretical perspective. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 1975, 6, 103–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Robinson, J. P. How Americans use time. New York: Praeger Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  115. Rohner, R. They love me, they love me not: A world-wide study of the effect of parental acceptance and rejection. New Haven, Conn.: HRAF Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  116. Rosow, I. Social integration of the aged. New York: Free Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  117. Rueveni, V. Networking families in crisis. New York: Human Services Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  118. Saltz, R. Aging persons as child-care workers in a foster grandparent program: Psychosocial effects and work performance. Aging and Human Development, 1971, 2, 314–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Saltz, R. Effects of part-time “mothering” on IQ and SQ of young institutionalized children. Child Development, 1973, 44, 166–170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Shanas, E. Social myth as hypothesis: The case of the family relations of old people. Gerontologist, 1979, 19, 3–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Smith, E. W. The role of the grandmother in adolescent pregnancy and parenting. Journal of School Health, 1975, 45, 278–283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Staples, R., & Smith, J. W. Attitudes of grandmothers and mothers toward child rearing practices. Child Development, 1954, 25, 91–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Streib, G. F. Family patterns in retirement. Journal of Social Issues, 1958, 14, 46–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Sussman, M. B. The isolated nuclear family, fact or fiction? Social Problems, 1959, 6, 333–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Tinsley, B. R. The effect of grandparents as socialization and support agents on child development. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Child Development, Detroit, April 1983.Google Scholar
  126. Townsend, P. The family life of old people. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1957.Google Scholar
  127. Troll, L. The family of later life: A decade review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 1971, 33, 263–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Troll, L. E. Grandparenting. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
  129. Troll, L. E. Grandparenting. In: L. W. Poon (Ed.), Aging in the 1980’s: Psychological issues. New York: American Psychological Association, 1981.Google Scholar
  130. Troll, L., & Bengston, V. Generations in the family. In: W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, and I. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family, Vol. 1: Research-based theories. New York: Macmillan, 1979.Google Scholar
  131. Troll, L. E., & Turner, B. The effect of changing sex roles on the family of later life. Paper presented at the Ford Foundation Conference on Changing Sex Roles in the Family, Merrill-Palmer Institute, Detroit, 1976.Google Scholar
  132. Troll, L. E., Miller, S. J., & Atchley, R. C. Families in later life. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsowrth, 1979.Google Scholar
  133. Uhlenberg, P. Death and the family. Journal of Family History, 1980, 5, 313–320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Unger, D. An ecological approach to the family: The role of social networks, social stress and motherchild interaction. Unpublished master’s thesis, Merrill-Palmer Institute, 1979.Google Scholar
  135. Uzoka, A. F. The myth of the nuclear family: Historical background and clinical implications. American Psychologist, 1979, 34, 1095–1106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Wahler, R. G. Parent insularity as a determinant of generalization success in family treatment. In: S. Salzinger, J. Antrobus, and J. Glick, (Eds.), The ecosystem of the “sick” child: Implications for classification and intervention for disturbed and mentally retarded children. New York: Academic Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  137. Wandersman, L. P., Wandersman, A., & Kahn, S. Social support in the transition to parenthood. Journal of Community Psychology, 1980, 8, 332–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Waters, E., Wippman, J., & Sroufe, L. A. Attachment, positive effect, and competence in the peer group: Two studies in construct validation. Child Development, 1979, 50, 821–829.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. Vulnerable but invincible: A longitudinal study of resilient children and youth. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1982.Google Scholar
  140. Whiting, B. B., & Whiting, J. W. M. Children of six cultures: A psychocultural analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  141. Winch, R. F., Greer, S., & Blumberg, R. L. Ethnicity and extended familism in upper-middle-class suburb. American Sociological Review, 1967, 32, 265–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Yogman, M. W. Development of the father-infant relationship. In: H. Fitzgerald, B. Lester, and M. W. Yogman (Eds.), Theory and research in behavioral pediatrics (Vol. 1 ). New York: Plenum Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  143. Yorburg, B. The nuclear and the extended family: An area of conceptual confusion. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 1975, 6, 5–14.Google Scholar
  144. Zigler, E. F., & Gordon, E. W. Daycare: Scientific and social policy issues. Boston: Auburn Publishing House, 1982.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara R. Tinsley
    • 1
  • Ross D. Parke
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations