The Eden Decision Model

A Decision Model with Practical Applications for the Development of Behavior Decelerative Strategies
  • Peter F. Gerhardt
  • David L. Holmes
Part of the Current Issues in Autism book series (CIAM)

Abstract

Individuals with developmental disabilities have tremendous needs and often require intensive, lifelong intervention (Schopler & Mesibov, 1983) in such diverse areas as self-care and related life skills, functional communication skills, social skills, independent living skills (e.g., bill paying), and the use of adaptive work or mobility devices. Behavioral and educational methods of training have been found to be most effective in this effort (Schopler, Mesibov, & Baker, 1982). In addition, there is often the need to reduce certain dangerous or problematic behaviors.

Keywords

Apply Behavior Analysis Differential Reinforcement Anxious Behavior Functional Communication Training Curricular Component 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Axelrod, S. (1987). Functional and structural analysis of behavior: Approaches leading to reduced use of punishment procedures? Research in Developmental Disabilities, 8, 165–178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azrin, N. H., Besalel, V. A., Jamner, J. P., & Caputo, J. N. (1988). Comparative study of behavior methods of treating severe self-injury. Behavioral Residential Treatment, 3, 119–152.Google Scholar
  3. Azrin, N. H., & Holz, W. C. (1966). Punishment. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 380–447). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  4. Bailey, J. S., & Pyles, D. A. M. (1989). Behavioral diagnostics. In E. Cipani (Ed.), The treatment of severe behavior disorders: Behavior analysis approaches (pp. 85–107). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.Google Scholar
  5. Bijou, S. W., Peterson, R. F., Harris, F. R., Allen, K. E., & Johnson, M. S. (1969). Methodology for experimental studies of young children in natural settings. The Psychological Record, 19, 177–210.Google Scholar
  6. Carr, E. G. (1977). The motivation of self-injurious behavior: A review of some of the hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 800–816.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carr, E. G., & Newsome, C. D. (1985). Demand related tantrums: Conceptualization and treatment. Behavior Modification, 9, 403–426.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DiLorenzo, T. M., & Ollendick, T. H. (1986). Behavior modification: Punishment. In R. P. Barrett (Ed.), Severe behavior disorders in the mentally retarded: Nondrug approaches to treatment (pp. 27–60). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  10. Donnellan, A. H., Mirenda, P. L., Mesaros, R. A., & Fassbender, L. L. (1984). Analyzing the communicative functions of aberrant behavior. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 9, 201–212.Google Scholar
  11. Evans, I. M., & Meyer, L. H. (1985). An educative approach to behavior problems: A practical decision model for interventions with severely handicapped learners. Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks.Google Scholar
  12. Foster, S. L., Bell-Dolan, D. J., & Burge, D. A. (1988). Behavioral observation. In A. S. Bellack & M. Hersen (Eds.), Behavioral assessment: A practical handbook (pp. 119–160). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  13. Gardner, W. I. (1989). But in the meantime: A client perspective of the debate over the use of aversive/intrusive therapy procedures. The Behavior Therapist, 12, 179–181.Google Scholar
  14. Gerhardt, P., Holmes, D. L. Alessandri, M., & Goodman, M. (1992). Social policy on the use of aversive interventions: Empirical, ethical, and legal considerations. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 21, 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Green, C. W., Reid, D. H., White, L. K., Halford, R. C., Brittain, D. P., & Gardner, S. M. (1988). Identifying reinforcers for persons with profound handicaps: Staff opinion versus systematic assessment of preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 31–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Griffith, R. G. (1986). Administrative considerations and responsibilities: Legal and ethical issues. In R. P. Barrett (Ed.), Severe behavior disorders in the mentally retarded: Nondrug approaches to treatment (pp. 359–394). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  17. Groden, G. (1989). A guide for conducting a comprehensive behavioral analysis of a target behavior. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 20, 163–169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guess, D., Helmstetter E., Turnbull, H. R. III, & Knowlton, S. (1987). Use of aversive procedures with individuals who are disabled: A historical review and critical analysis. Monograph of the Association of Persons with Severe Handicaps, 2, 1.Google Scholar
  19. Gunsett, R. P., Mulick, J. A., Fernald, W. B., & Martin, J. L. (1989). Brief report: Indications for medical screening prior to behavioral programming for severely and profoundly mentally retarded clients. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 19, 167–172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harris, S. L., & Wolchik, S. A. (1979). Suppression of self stimulation: Three alternative strategies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 185–198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1976). Environmental programming: Implications for the severely handicapped. In H. Prehm & S. Deitz (Eds.), Early intervention for the severely handicapped: Programming accountability (pp. 197–221). Eugene: University of Oregon, College of Education.Google Scholar
  22. Holmes, D. L., & Gerhardt, P. F. (1989). Punishment: The issues as we see them. Links, 14, 8–9.Google Scholar
  23. Holmes, D. L., & Holmes, A. S. (Eds.) (1987). The Eden Programs General Procedures Manual. Princeton, NJ: Eden.Google Scholar
  24. Iwata, B. (1987). Aversive events and their role in the treatment of life threatening behavior. Paper presented at the conference on Life Threatening Behavior: Aversive versus Nonaversive Intervention, Piscataway, NJ.Google Scholar
  25. Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1982). Toward a functional analysis of self injury. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koegel, R. L., & Koegel, L. K. (1989). Community-referenced research on self-stimulation. In E. Cipani (Ed.), Treatment of severe behavior disorders: Behavior Analysis Approaches (pp. 129–150). Washington, DC: AAMR.Google Scholar
  27. LaVigna, G. W., & Donnellan, A. M. (1986). Alternatives to punishment: Solving problem behavior with nonaversive strategies. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  28. Lovaas, O. I., & Favell, J. E. (1987). Protection for clients undergoing aversive/restrictive interventions. Education and Treatment of Children, 10, 311–325.Google Scholar
  29. Lovaas, O. I., Newsome, C., & Hickman, C. (1987). Self stimulatory behavior and perceptual reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 45–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Matson, J. L., & DiLorenzo, T. M. (1984). Punishment and its alternatives: A new perspective for behavior modification. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. O’Neill, R. E., Horner, R. H., Albin, R. W., Storey, K., & Sprague, J. (1990). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A practical assessment guide. Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Pace, G. M., Ivancic, M. T., Edwards, G. L., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1985). Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 249–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Powers, M. D., & Handleman, J. H. (1984). Behavioral assessment of severe developmental disabilities. Rockville, MD: Aspen.Google Scholar
  34. Schopler, E. (1990). Editorial: Basic disagreements with Autism Society of America. Spectrum, 4, 10–11.Google Scholar
  35. Schopler, E., & Mesibov, G. B. (Eds.). (1983). Autism in adolescents and adults. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  36. Schopler, E., Mesibov, G., & Baker, A. (1982). Evaluation of treatment for autistic children and their parents. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 21, 262–267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Simpson, R. L., & Regan, M. (Eds.). (1986). Management of autistic behavior: Information service for educators. Rockville, MD: Aspen.Google Scholar
  38. Simpson, R. L., Regan, M., Sasso, G., & Noll, M. B. (1986). Behavioral intervention techniques. In R. Simpson & M. Regan (Eds.), Management of autistic behavior: Information service for educators (pp. 6.1–6.36). Rockville, MD: Aspen.Google Scholar
  39. Touchette, P. E., MacDonald, R. F., & Langer, S. N. (1985). A scatter plot for identifying the stimulus control of a problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 343–351.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Van Houten, R., Axelrod, S., Bailey, J. S., Favell, J. E., Foxx, R. M., Iwata, B. A., & Lovaas, O. I. (1988). The right to effective behavioral treatment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 381–384.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Williams, B. F., Williams, R. L., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1989). The use of token economies with individuals who have developmental disabilities. In E. Cipani (Ed.), The treatment of severe behavior disorders: Behavior analysis approaches (pp. 3–18). Washington, DC: AAMR.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter F. Gerhardt
    • 1
  • David L. Holmes
    • 1
  1. 1.The Eden ServicesPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations