Providing Outclinic Services
The implementation and evaluation of effective behavioral treatments is most commonly conducted in controlled settings, such as inpatient units, residential facilities, or classrooms. This occurs because those settings provide opportunities for direct observation over extended time periods. Direct observation of trends in behavior, when coupled with measures of treatment integrity, provides the information needed to evaluate functional control (i.e., the relation between the independent and dependent variables can be directly assessed within subjects over time and across treatment conditions). Functional control over behavior is a necessary condition for defining an effective treatment, and thus the majority of behavioral research is completed within controlled settings.
KeywordsAggressive Behavior Target Behavior Apply Behavior Analysis Social Validity Functional Communication Training
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Cooper, L. (1989, May). Functional analysis of conduct disorders in an outclinic setting. In D. Wacker (Chair), Functional analysis of severe behavior problems: Recent applications and novel approaches. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Milwaukee, WI.Google Scholar
- Cooper, L., Wacker, D., Sasso, G., Reimers, T., & Donn, L. (1990). Using parents as therapists to assess the appropriate behavior of their children through a functional analysis: Application to a tertiary diagnostic clinic. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 285–296.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Northup, J., Wacker, D., Steege, M., Cigrand, K., Sasso, G., & Cook, J. (1989, May). Outpatient evaluation of self-injurious and aggressive behavior using functional analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Milwaukee, WI.Google Scholar
- Reimers, T. (1986). Acceptability of behavioral treatment recommendations: Social validation in an outclinic. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City.Google Scholar
- Reimers, T., & Wacker, D. (1988). Parents’ ratings of acceptability of behavioral treatment recommendations made in an outpatient clinic: A preliminary analysis of the influence of treatment effectiveness. Behavioral Disorders, 14, 7–15.Google Scholar
- Reimers, T., Wacker, D., & Koeppl, G. (1987). Acceptability of behavioral interventions: A review of the literature. School Psychology Review, 16, 212–227.Google Scholar
- Steege, M. (1989, May). Functional analysis of self-injurious behavior in an outclinic setting. In D. Wacker (Chair), Functional analysis of severe behavior problems: Recent applications and novel approaches. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Milwaukee, WI.Google Scholar
- Wacker, D., Steege, M., & Berg, W. (1990). Best practices in assessment and intervention with persons who are severely handicapped. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 81–92). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
- Wacker, D., Steege, M., Northup, J., Reimers, T., Berg, W, & Sasso, G. (1990). Use of functional analysis and acceptability measures to assess and treat severe behavior problems: An outpatient clinic model. In N. Singh & A. Repp (Eds.), Aversive and non-aversive treatment: The great debate in developmental disabilities (pp. 349–359). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.Google Scholar
- Witt, J. C, & Elliott, S. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom management strategies. In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology, vol. 4 (pp. 251–288). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar