During the 1980s, there was a perceived need to define more clearly the rights of people receiving behavioral treatment. This need arose from abundant controversies involving the courts, legislatures, professional groups, and advocacy organizations. In response to this need, the Association for Behavior Analysis (ABA) commissioned a task force to examine issues concerning people’s right to effective treatment. The final report was accepted by the executive council of ABA at its October 1987 meeting. An abbreviated version of the task force report subsequently was overwhelmingly endorsed as a position statement by the voting members of ABA and became official ABA policy. A copy of the final task force report, and the position statement endorsed by the ABA membership, are included in Appendices A and B.
KeywordsProblem Behavior Developmental Disability Behavior Analysis Target Behavior Apply Behavior Analysis
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Brown, L., Bronston, M. B., Hamre-Neitupski, S., Pumpian, I., Certo, N., & Greunwald, L. A. (1979). A strategy for developing chronological age appropriate and functional curricula content for severely handicapped adolescents and young adults. Journal of Special Education, 13, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). The social-communicative basis of severe behavior problems in children. In S. Reiss & R. Bootzin (Eds.), Theoretical issues in behavior therapy (pp. 219–254). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Evans, I. M., & Meyer, L. H. (1987). Moving to educational validity: A reply to Test, Spooner, and Cooke. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 12, 103–106.Google Scholar
- Favell, J. E., & Reid, D. H. (1988). Generalizing and maintaining improvement in problem behavior. In R. H. Horner, G. Dunlap, & R. L. Koegel (Eds.), Generalization and maintenance: Lifestyle changes in applied settings. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
- Horner, R. H., & Billingsley, F. F. (1988). The effect of competing behavior on the generalization and maintenance of adaptive behavior in applied settings. In R. H. Horner, R. L. Koegel, & G. Dunlap (Eds.), Generalization and maintenance: Lifestyle changes in applied settings (pp. 197–220). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
- Horner, R. H., McDonald, R. F., & Bellamy, G. T. (1986). Teaching generalized skills: General case instruction in simulation and community settings. In R. H. Horner, L. H. Meyer & H. D. B. Fredericks (Eds.), Education of learners with severe handicaps: Exemplary service strategies (pp. 289–314). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
- Iwata, B. A., Vollmer, T. R., & Zarcone, I. R. (1990). The experimental functional/analysis of behavior disorders: Methodology, applications, and limitations. In A. C. Repp & N. N. Singh, Perspectives on the use of nonaversive and aversive interventions for persons with developmental disabilities (pp. 301–330). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.Google Scholar
- Kazdin, A. E. (1984). Behavior modification in applied settings (3rd ed.). Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
- Lovaas, I. Q, & Favell, J. E. (1987). Protection for clients undergoing aversive restrictive interventions. Education and Treatment of Children, 10, 311–325.Google Scholar
- Spreat, S., Lipinski, D., Dickerson, R., Nass, R., & Dorsey, M. (1989). A paramorphic representation of the acceptability of behavioral programming. Behavioral Residential Treatment, 4, 1–13.Google Scholar
- Wacker, D. P. (1989). Further evaluation of functional communication training: An analysis of active treatment components. In Treatment of destructive behaviors in persons with developmental disabilities (pp. 57–58). Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar
- Zarcone, J. R., Rodgers, T. A., Iwata, B. A., Rourke, D, & Dorsey, M. F. (in press). Reliability analysis of the Motivation Assessment Scale: A failure to replicate. Research in Developmental Disabilities.Google Scholar