Circuitous Harm

Determinants and Consequences of Nondirect Aggression
  • Deborah R. Richardson
  • Laura R. Green
Part of the The Springer Series in Social/Clinical Psychology book series (SSSC)

Abstract

When we think of someone causing harm to another person, we usually think of that harm being delivered directly. Many of our experiences as either perpetrators or targets of aggression are likely to have involved direct confrontation; someone says something hurtful or rude to another person or someone hits or throws something at another person. However, much of the harm people experience in day-to-day life is likely to be delivered through some less direct, more circuitous route. In fact, there may be some contexts, such as the workplace (Baron & Neuman, 1996), in which nondirect aggression may be the preferred response to conflict.

Keywords

Aggressive Behavior Social Skill Physical Aggression Relational Aggression Romantic Partner 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baron, R. A., & Neuman, J. H. (1996). Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence on their relative frequency and potential causes. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baron, R. A., & Richardson, D. R. (1994). Human aggression. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  3. Baumeister, R & Leary, M. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 497-529Google Scholar
  4. Bjsörkqvist, K. (1994). Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: A review of recent research. Sex Roles, 30, 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bjsörkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 18, 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bjsörkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). The development of direct and indirect aggressive strategies in males and females. In K. Bjsörkqvist & P. Niemela (Eds.), Of mice and women: Aspects of female aggression. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bjsörkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Lagerspetz, K. (1994). Sex differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brodzinsky, D., Messer, S., & Tew, J. (1979). Sex differences in children’s expression and control of fantasy and overt aggression. Child Development, 50, 372–379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buss, A. H. (1961). The psychology of aggression. New York: John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buss, A.H., & Durkee, A. (1957). An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 22, 196–302.Google Scholar
  11. Cairns, R., Cairns, B., Neckerman, H., Ferguson, L., & Gariépy, J. (1989). Growth and aggression: 1. Childhood to early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 25, 320–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crick, N. (1995). Relational aggression: The role of intent attributions, feelings of distress, and provocation type. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crick, N., & Dodge, K. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crick, N., & Grotpeter, J. (1995). Relational aggression, gender and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710–722.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eskilson, A., & Wiley, M.G. (1976). Sex composition and leadership in small groups. Sociometry, 39, 183–194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feshbach, N. (1969). Sex differences in children’s modes of aggressive responses to outsiders. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 15, 249–258.Google Scholar
  17. Green, L., & Richardson, D. (1995, July). Gender relates to direct, but not indirect, aggression. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Society, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Green, L., Richardson, D., & Lago, T. (1996). How do friendship, indirect, and direct aggression relate? Aggressive Behavior, 22, 81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hines, N., & Fry, D. (1994). Indirect modes of aggression among women of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Sex Roles, 30, 215–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaukiainen, A., Bjsörkqvist, K., Österman, K., Lagerspetz, K., & Niskanen, L. (1994). Social intelligence and the use of indirect aggression. Paper presented at the 11th World Meeting of the International Society for Research on Aggression, Delray Beach, Florida.Google Scholar
  21. Lagerspetz, K., & Bjsörkqvist, K. (1994). Indirect aggression in boys and girls. In L.R. Huesmann (Ed.), Aggressive behavior: Current perspectives (pp. 131–150). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lagerspetz, K., Bjsörkqvist, K., & Peltonen, T. (1988). Is indirect aggression typical of females? Gender differences in aggressiveness in 11-to 12-year-old children. Aggressive Behavior, 14, 403–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lancelotta, G., & Vaughn, S. (1989). Relation between types of aggression and sociometric status: Peer and teacher perceptions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 86–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leaper, C., & Holliday, H. (1995). Gossip in same-gender and cross-gender friends’ conversations. Personal Relationships, 2, 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Österman, K., Bjsörkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K., Kaukiainen, Huesmann, L., & Fraczek, A. (1994). Peer and self-estimated aggression and victimization in 8-year-old children from five ethnic groups. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 411–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Richardson, D.R. (1996, May). The effects of gender and relationship on direct and indirect aggression. Paper presented at the annual Nags Head Conference, Highland Beach, Florida.Google Scholar
  27. Spetter, D., La Greca, A., Hogan, A., & Vaughn, S. (1992). Subgroups of rejected boys: Aggressive responses to peer conflict situations. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 21, 20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Thompson, H.L. & Richardson, D. (1983). The Rooster Effect: Same-sex rivalry and inequity as factors in retaliative aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 415–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah R. Richardson
    • 1
  • Laura R. Green
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonUSA

Personalised recommendations