CEBAF Cryounit Loss of Vacuum Experiment

  • Mark Wiseman
  • Richard Bundy
  • J. Patrick Kelley
  • William Schneider
Part of the Applications of Cryogenic Technology book series (APCT, volume 10)

Abstract

In order to test the sizing of the safety relief devices provided for the Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility’s 42 1/4 Cryomodules, several loss of vacuum experiments have been planned with a modified 1/4 Cryomodule called the Cryobench. The first of these experiments, presented here, is a controlled spoiling of the insulating vacuum to air. The most credible vacuum failure was simulated with in a 3.2 mm diameter hole being opened to the vacuum space yielding an air flow of 0.0033 kg/s and corresponding peak heat fluxes of 749 W/m2 just before the rupture disc opened. The maximum calculated helium mass flows of.025 kg/s indicate that the process relief valve provided on each cryomodule is adequate to handle this type of vacuum failure. The experimental configuration and recorded data are presented and discussed.

Keywords

Relief Valve Orifice Plate Vacuum Space Thermal Shield Pneumatic Valve 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H.A. Grunder, J.J. Bisognano, W.I. Diamond, B.K. Hartline, C.W. Leemann, J. Mougey, R.M. Sundelin, The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility, Proceedings of the 1987 IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference ed. E.R. Lindstrom and L.S. Taylor, (1987).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R.M. Sundelin, RF Superconductivity at CEBAF, Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on RF Conductivity ed.Y. Kojima, National Laboratory for High Energy Physics, Japan (1990).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Wiseman, R. Bundy, A. Guerra, J.P. Kelley, T. Lee, W. Schneider, K. Smith, E. Stitts, H. Whitehead, Cryobench Apparatus for Testing CEBAF Cryogenic Subcomponents, presented at the CRY() `90 Conference, Binghampton, NY (1990).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Cauallame, I. Gonine, D. Güsewell, and R. Stierlien, Safety Tests with the LEP Superconducting Cavity, CERN (1989).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    V.D. Bartenev, V.I. Datskov, Yu. A. Shishou, and A.G. Zel’dovich, Study of the Process of Insulation Vacuum Failure in Helium Cryostat, “Cryogenics”, Vol. 26, (1986).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D.B. Mann, Properties of Helium, in: “Technology of Liquid Helium,” NBS Mono. 111, R.H. Kropshot, B.W. Birmingham, and D.B. Mann, ed., National Bureau of Standards, Boulder (1968)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B.M. Coulter, Jr., “Compressible Flow Manual”, Fluid Research Publishing, Houston (1984).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Flow of Fluids, Technical Paper No. 410, Crane Co., New York (1969).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Wiseman
    • 1
  • Richard Bundy
    • 1
  • J. Patrick Kelley
    • 1
  • William Schneider
    • 1
  1. 1.Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator FacilityNewport NewsUSA

Personalised recommendations