Ramp Rate Sensitivity in Accelerator Magnets

  • G. T. MallickJr.
Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering Materials book series (ACRE, volume 42)

Abstract

Degraded magnet performance, sometimes quite dramatic, was observed in many dipole magnets built for the SSC. A number of magnets which exhibited degraded performance fell into two classes, ingeniously referred to as type “A” and “B”. As a result of a great deal of theoretical and experimental work, considerable progress has been made toward understanding this behavior. This article reviews much of this work, and speculates as to how better magnets might be produced using the results of what we have learned.

Keywords

Dipole Magnet Eddy Current Ramp Rate Magnet Performance Induce Eddy Current 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Martin N. Wilson, “Superconducting Magnets,” Oxford University Press, New York (1983), Ch. 5.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ibid, p. 27ff.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Brechna, “Superconducting Magnet Systems,” Springer-Verlag, New York (1973), p. 518ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    CH. Walters, Design of multistrand conductors for superconducting magnet windings, Brookhaven National Laboratories informal report BNL 18928 AADD 74–2(1974).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. H. Morgan, Eddy currents in flat metal-filled superconducting braids, J. Appl. Phys. 44:3319(1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. P. Verweij and H. H. J. ten Kate, Coupling currents in Rutherford cables under time varying conditions, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 3:146(1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. A. Akhmetov, A. Devred, and T. Ogitsu, Periodicity of crossover currents in a Rutherford-type cable subjected to a time-dependent magnetic field, J. Appl. Phys. 75:3176(1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. J. Carr, Jr., Interstrand Eddy Currents in an SSC Cable Based on Morgan’s Model, Westinghouse Science and Technology Center report 94–9TM0-SSCRR-M1, (1994).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. J. Carr, Jr., “AC Loss and Macroscopic Theory of Superconductors,” Gordon and Breech, New York (1983).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    W. J. Carr, Jr., and V. T. Kovachev, Interstrand eddy current losses in ssc magnets, to be published in Cryogenics (1995)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. T. Kovachev, M. J. Neal, D. W. Capone II, W. J. Carr, Jr., and C. Swenson, Interstrand resistance of SSC magnets, Cryogenics 34:813(1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. T. Mallick, Jr., J. M. Toms, W. J. Carr, Jr., and V. T. Kovachev, Eddy currents in superconducting Rutherford Cables, to be published in Cryogenics.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Strait et al., Quench performance of Fermi lab/General Dynamics built full length collider dipole magnets, in “Supercollider 4”, John Nonte, ed., Plenum Press, New York (1992), p.365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. D. Mclnturff et al., Model magnet studies, IEEE Trans. Mag. MAG21:478(1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. P. Ozelis, S. Delchamps, et al., AC loss measurements of model and full size 50mm SSC collider dipole magnets at Fermilab, IEEE Trans. Appl. Superconductivity, 3:678(1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    T. Ojitsu, Y. Zhao, A. Akhmetov, and A. Devred, Influence of cable eddy currents on magnetic field harmonics, presented at the ICFA workshop on AC superconductivity, June 23–25, 1992, KEK, Tsukuba, Japan.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. P. Verweij, A. den Ouden, B. Sachse, and H. H. J. ten Kate, The effect of transverse pressure on the interstrand coupling loss of Rutherford type of cables, in “Advances in Cryogenic Engineering Vol 40,” R. P. Reed, editor, Plenum Press, New York, (1994), p.521.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. I. Schermer, Operation of magnets with heat deposition in the windings, SSCL Report MD-TA- 173(1991)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    W. J. Carr, Jr., Contribution of ramped field loss to quench current degradation in SSC magnets., Westinghouse Science and Technology Center report 94–9TM0,SSCRR-M4(1994).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. I. Schermer, Status of superconducting magnets for the superconducting super collider, IEEE Tran. Mag. 30:1587(1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. M. Butler, C. A. Swenson, and W. J. Carr, Jr., Progress in understanding ramp rate sensitivity in high energy booster dipole magnets, in “Supercollider 5”, P. Hale, ed., Plenum Press, New York (1994), p.821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    W. J. Carr, Jr., G. T. Mallick, Jr., and V. T. Kovachev, Theory of quench current in B-type SSC magnets, Westinghouse Science and Technology Center report 94-TM0-SSCRR-M3(1994).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. T. MallickJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Westinghouse Science and Technology CenterPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations