Research of a New Coil Design for Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage

  • A. Mailfert
  • M. Takorabet
  • A. Colteu
Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering book series (ACRE, volume 43)

Abstract

Some superconducting devices like Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage (SMES) need a small external stray field and sometimes a constant internal field (MRI). Both problems can be approached using special coil configurations. Basic forms like torus, solenoid, and alternate solenoids with parallel axis, are well known. The active shielding method is based on the cancelation of the lower order magnetic moments of a current loop. We propose two designs that handle both problems. One configuration is composed by two spherical concentric distributions of current where a special diameters ratio is determinated in order to realise good conditions for the superconducting windings. The other one is a polygonal structure. The technological approach of these two theoretical designs is considered. The study will focus on energy, flux density and geometrical data.

Keywords

Flux Density Stray Field Polygonal Structure Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage Magnetic Stray Field 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C. Levillain, «Minimal performances of high TC wires for cost effective SMES compared to low Tc’s», IEEE Trans. MAG, Vol.32, N°4,pp.2308–2311, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schoenung, SM., Meier W.R., Hassenzahl W.V., «A comparison of large scale toroidal and solenoidal SMES systems», Journal IEEE Trans. MAG. Vol 27 Iss 2 pt3 p2324 – 2329, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. V. Hassenzahl, «A comparison of the conductor requirements for energy storage devices made with ideal conductor geometries», Journal IEEE Trans. MAG Vol 25 p1799–1802, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. V. Hassenzahl, «Considerations against a force compensated coil», Journal IEEE Trans. MAG Vol 25 p 1854–1858, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mostafa K. Abdelsalam, «MicroSMES Magnet Configuration for reduced Stray field applications», IEEE Trans. ASC, Vol.5, N°2, 1995.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Ishibari, K. Kamezawa, A. Katase, A. Terashima, Y. Sakakibara, Y. Funashi, H. Hirabayashi; «Design study on future accelerator magnets using largely keystoned cables», Journal IEEE Trans. MAG Vol 25 Iss 2 pt3, p 1628, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Blosser, J. Bailey, R. Burleigh, D. Johnson, E. Kashy, T. Kuo, F. Marti, J. Vincent, A. Zeller, «Superconducting cylotron for medical applications», Journal IEEE Trans. MAG Vol 25 p 1746–1755, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.H. Schultz, DB. Montgomery, H.J. Thome, E.S. Bobrov, and R.J. Fleming,«Poloidal field coil and cryogenic systems for the FCX Tokamak», Journal IEEE Trans. MAG Vol 21 pl064–1066, 1985.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. Weck, P. Ehrhart, A. Müller and G. Reiner, «Superconducting Inductive Pulsed Power Supply for electromagnetic launchers: design aspects and experimental investigation of laboratory set-up», IEEE Trans. MAG, Vol.33, N°1, pp.524–527, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. Vivaldi, L. Ottonelo, «Study on possible constructive solution of SMES for different applications in the italian background.», Proceeding of the IEA Symposium on the use of superconductivity in energy storage, Editor World scientific-Juengst, Komarek, Maurer, 1994.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Fresacher, G. Schönwetter, J. Gerhold, «Active shielded transportable SMES systems», IEEE Trans. MAG, Vol.32, N°4 pp.2349–2352, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Y. Wachi, A. Miura, T. Hamyaima, T. Uchida, «Developpement of a forced cooling D-Shaped superconducting coil by supercritical helium», Journal IEEE Trans. MAG Vol 19 Iss 3 p320–324 May 1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. Durand, Electrostatique II, Problèmes généraux conducteurs, Edition MassonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Mailfert
    • 1
  • M. Takorabet
    • 1
  • A. Colteu
    • 1
  1. 1.Groupe de Recherches en Electrotechnique et Electronique de Nancy, Institut National Polytechnique de LorraineGREEN INPLVandoeuvre les NancyFrance

Personalised recommendations