Suppression of Superfluid Film Flow in the XRS Helium Dewar

  • P. J. Shirron
  • M. J. DiPirro
Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering book series (ACRE, volume 43)

Abstract

Superfluid helium dewars for space missions use a porous plug phase separator to retain the bulk liquid while releasing boiloff vapor. Although the thermomechanical force is quite effective in holding the liquid against the internal vapor pressure, van der Waals forces will lead to a leakage of helium through the porous plug to feed the flow of a superfluid film in the vent line. Since the latent heat is generally not extracted from the remaining liquid, the film poses a serious problem for space missions such as the X-Ray Spectrometer (XRS) which have extremely low heat load budgets. A design for the XRS porous plug and vent system is presented which keeps film losses below 2 µg/s through a combination of a heat exchanger, to evaporate the film, and a knife-edge device. Tests of the vent have been conducted in a minus 1g configuration. At the expected on-orbit tank temperature of 1.22 K, film losses are negligible, but rise to 4 µg/s at the maximum tank temperature of 1.30 K. Design parameters and performance tests are discussed.

Keywords

Heat Exchanger Mass Flow Rate Critical Velocity Film Flow Knife Edge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    I. Rudnick, On the thickness, Doppler shift, superfluid density and critical velocity of a flowing unsaturated helium film, in: “Liquid and Solid Helium,” C.G. Kuper, S. G. Lipson, and M. Revzen, eds. Wiley and Sons, New York (1975), p. 311Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. J. Shirron, K. A. Gillis, and J. M. Mochel, Third sound in thin helium films on Ar, Ne, and CO2, J. Low Temp. Phys., 78:157 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Torii, S. R. Bandler, T. More, F. S. Porter, R. E. Lanou, H. J. Maris, and G. M. Seidel, Removal of superfluid helium films from surfaces below 0.1 K, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63:230 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. J. DiPirro and J. Zahniser, The liquid/vapor phase boundary in a porous plug, Adv. Cryo. Eng. 35A:173 (1990).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    See for example, D. M. Young and A. D. Crowell, “Physical Adsorption of Gases”, Butterworths Publishing Company, Washington (1962).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Bijl, J. DeBoer, and A. Michels, Physica 9:655 (1941).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. H. Haycock, Remote-controlled Stepper-motor-activated cryogenic valve: design, development, and testing, Proceedings of the SPIE: Cryogenic Optical Systems and Instruments VII, L. G. Burriesci and J. B. Heaney, eds., 2814:166 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. J. Shirron
    • 1
  • M. J. DiPirro
    • 1
  1. 1.NASA/Goddard Space Flight CenterGreenbeltUSA

Personalised recommendations