Equivalence between Nonlinear Differential and Difference Equation Models Using Kernel Invariance Methods

  • Xiao Zhao
  • Vasilis Z. Marmarelis

Abstract

Actual modeling studies are based on discrete-time (sampled) data and yield discrete-time models, although the actual physiological processes may occur in continuous time. In the case of nonlinear parametric models (i.e., differential or difference equations), the physiological interpretation of the estimated model parameters may change considerably between discrete-time and continuous-time representations. Thus, methods for defining the equivalence between nonlinear parametric models in continuous-time (differential equations) and discrete-time (difference equations) are critically needed to assist in model interpretation. This paper presents the “kernel invariance method”, which is a conceptual extension of the “impulse invariance method” in linear system modeling. This method uses as a canonical representation the general Volterra model form of nonlinear systems and requires that the sampled continuous-time kernels (corresponding to the differential equation) be identical to the discrete-time kernels (corresponding to the equivalent difference equation). The actual implementation of this method may become unwieldy in the general case, but it appears to be tractable in certain cases of low-order nonlinear systems. Two illustrative examples of a quadratic system are presented that make use of 1st-order and 2nd-order kernel invariance.

Keywords

Impulse Response Function Differential Equation Model Invariance Method Volterra Kernel Partial Fraction Expansion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barrett, J.F. (1963) The use of functionals in the analysis of nonlinear physical systems. J. Electron. Control, 15:567–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marmarelis, P.Z. and Marmarelis, V.Z. (1978) Analysis of Physiological Systems: The White-Noise Approach, Plenum, New York; Russian translation (1981): Mir Press, Moscow; Chinese translation (1990): Chinese Academy of Sciences Press, Beijing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marmarelis, V.Z. (ed.) (1987) Advanced Mähods of Physiological System Modeling, Volume I. USC Biomedical Simulations Resources, Los Angeles, California.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marmarelis, V.Z. (ed.) (1989) Advanced Mähods of Physiological System Modeling, Volume II, Plenum, New York, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marmarelis, V.Z. (1989) Identification and modeling of a class of nonlinear systems. Math. Comput. Mod., 12:991–995.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marmarelis, V.Z. (1991) Wiener analysis of nonlinear feedback in sensory systems. Ann. Biomed. Eng., 19:345–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marmarelis, V.Z., Masri, S.F., Udwadia, F.E., Caughey, T.K. and Jeong, G.D. (1979) Analytical and experimental studies of the modeling of a class of nonlinear systems. Nucl. Eng. Des., 5559–68.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oppenheim, A.V. and Schafer, R.W. (1975) Digital Signal Processing, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Giffs, New Jersey.MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rugh, W.M. (1981) Nonlinear System Theory: The Volterra/Wiener Approach. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiao Zhao
    • 1
  • Vasilis Z. Marmarelis
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Biomedical and Electrical EngineeringUniversity of Southern CaliforniaUSA

Personalised recommendations