From a culture of war and violence to a culture of peace and non-violence

  • David B. Adams
Chapter

Abstract

In my remarks today, I should like to speak to three issues: 1) trace briefly the transition from the Seville Statement on Violence to the United Nations initiatives for a culture of peace. 2) look at each of the 8 action areas for a culture of peace and consider them as research challenges; and 3) take a quick look at the development of the global movement for a culture of peace and consider that, also, as a research challenge.

Keywords

Conflict Resolution Research Challenge Global Movement Truth Commission Reconciliation Commission 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams, D.B., 1981, Ethics of aggression research: Papers from a symposium of International Society for Research on Aggression. Aggression Research 7: 367–369.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Scott, J.P., 1987, The biological basis of warfare. In Essays in Violence ( J. Martin Ramirez, R. Hinde and J. Groebel, eds.) University of Seville, Spain.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adams, D.B., 1989, The Seville Statement on Violence: A Progress Report. Journal of Peace Research. 26: 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adams, D.B. and Bosch, S. 1987, The myth that war is intrinsic to human nature discourages action for peace by young people. In Essays in Violence ( J. Martin Ramirez, R. Hinde and J. Groebel, eds.) University of Seville, Spain.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adams, D. 1991, The Seville Statement on Violence: Preparing the Ground for the Constructing of Peace, UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Adams, D. (ed), 1995 UNESCO and a Culture of Peace: Promoting a global movement, UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Averill. J.R., 1982, Anger and Aggression: An essay on emotions. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Averill, J.R., 1983, Studies on anger and aggression: Implications for theories of emotion. American Psychologist, 38: 1145–1160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Adams, D. 1986, The role of anger in the consciousness development of peace activists: Where physiology and history intersect. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 4: 157–164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gleditsch, N.P., 1992, Democracy and peace. Journal of Peace Research, 29 (4): 369–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Adams, D.B., 1995, Internal military intervention in the United States. Journal of Peace Research, 32: 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tutu, D., 1999, No Future without Forgiveness. Rider, London.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huesmann, L.R and Eron, L.D. (eds.) 1986. Television and the Aggressive Child.. A cross-national comparison Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Embers, C.R., and Embers, M., 1992, Resource unpredictability, mistrust, and war. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 36: 242–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Adams, D.B., 1983. Why there are so few women warriors. Behavior Science Research, 18: 196–212.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Adams, D.B., 1985. The American Peace Movements: History, Root Causes, and Future. Advocate Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Adams, D.B., 1995. Psychology for Peace Activists: A New Psychology for the Generation Who Can Abolish War (Revised Edition). Advocate Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Embers, C.R., and Embers, M., 1994, War, socialization, and interpersonal violence. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 38: 620–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Phillips, D., 1983, The impact of mass media violence on U.S. homicides. American Sociological Review, 48: 560–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Archer, D. and Gartner, R., 1984. Violence and Crime in Cross-National Perspective. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Landau, S.F. and Rolef, S.H. 1998. Intimate Femicide in Israel: Temporal, social, and motivational patterns. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 6: 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • David B. Adams
    • 1
  1. 1.Unit for the International Year for the Culture of PeaceUNESCOParisFrance

Personalised recommendations