The DNS Model: An Improved Spectral Model for Ocean Wave Prediction

  • J. H. Allender
  • T. P. Barnett
  • M. Lybanon

Abstract

Any attempt to model the frequency-and direction-dependent ocean wave spectrum F(f, θ)is a formidable task. The only more or less unified theory (Hasselmann, 1967) has not been reduced to a practical form. The approach taken in this study is to combine individual, existing theories to produce results that are compatible with our present understanding of the evolving wind wave spectrum. In this chapter we discuss a discrete spectral model that uses an adaptation of the method of characteristics to propagate energy. The numerical method was discussed originally by Barnett et al. (1969).

Keywords

Wave Spectrum Wind Wave Spectral Model Wave Component Wave Growth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnett, T. P. (1968): On the generation, dissipation and prediction of ocean wind waves. J. Geophys. Res. 73, 513–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnett, T. P., and J. C. Wilkerson (1967): On the generation of wind waves as inferred from airborne measurements of fetch-limited spectra. J. Mar. Res. 25, 292–328.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, T. P., C. H. Holland, and P. Yager (1969): A general technique for wind wave prediction with application to the South China Sea. Final report, contract N62306-68-C0285, U.S. Naval Oceanographic Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  4. Ewing, J. A. (1971): A numerical wave prediction method for the North Atlantic Ocean. Dtsch. Hydrogr. Z. 24, 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hasselmann, D. E., M. Dunckel, and J. A. Ewing (1980): Directional wave spectra observed during JONSWAP 1973. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 10, 1264–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hasselmann, K. (1963): On the nonlinear energy transfer in a gravity-wave spectrum. 3. Computation of the energy flux and swell—sea interaction for a Neumann spectrum. J. Fluid Mech. 15, 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hasselmann, K. (1967): Nonlinear interactions treated by the methods of theoretical physics (with application to the generation of waves by wind). Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 229, 77-100.Google Scholar
  8. Hasselmann, K, and S. Hasselmann (1981): A symmetrical method of computing the nonlinear transfer in a gravity wave spectrum. Internal Report, Max Planck Institute of Meteorology, Hamburg.Google Scholar
  9. Hasselmann, K, T P. Barnett, E. Bouws, H. Carlson, D. E. Cartwright, K. Enke, J. A. Ewing, H. Gienapp, D. E. Hasselmann, P. Kruseman A Meerburg, P. Müller, D. J. Olbers, K. Richter, W. Sell, and H. Walden (1973): Measurements of wind-wave growth and swell decay during the Joint North Sea Wave Project (JONSWAP). Dtsch. Hydrogr. Z., Suppl. A 8 (12).Google Scholar
  10. Hasselmann, K., D. B. Ross, P. Müller, and W. Sell (1976): A parametric wave prediction model. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 6, 200–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Preisendorfer, R., F. Zevlers, and T. P. Barnett (1981): Foundations of principal components selection rules. Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Reference Series, 81–4.Google Scholar
  12. Snyder, R. L., F. W. Dobson, J. A. Elliot, and R. B. Long (1981). Array measurements of atmospheric pressure fluctuations above surface gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech. 102, 1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. H. Allender
    • 1
  • T. P. Barnett
    • 2
  • M. Lybanon
    • 1
  1. 1.Naval Ocean Research and Development ActivityNSTL StationUSA
  2. 2.Scripps Institution of OceanographyLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations