Uncovering textual meanings: a case study involving systemic-functional resources for the generation of Japanese texts

  • John A. Bateman
Part of the The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science book series (SECS, volume 119)

Abstract

A functional grammar of the systemic-functional variety decomposes the generation process in terms of sets of interrelated, functionally motivated grammatical alternatives. When such a grammar is used for generation, it has distinct informational needs: that is, if its supporting environment does not contain the information that the grammar requires in order to motivate the grammatical alternatives it offers, generation cannot proceed. The chooser and inquiry framework designed for the PENMAN system further decomposes grammatical alternatives into finer-grained semantic alternatives. These latter place specific constraints on the kinds of information that a generation system, and any underlying theory of semantics, must support and so can be used for determining what kinds of information are necessary. Significantly, the informational needs of a systemic-functional grammar are not restricted to ‘propositional content’-related areas: textual and interpersonal areas are also entailed. The methodology of uncovering semantic distinctions based on the informational needs of a grammar should then be applicable in these areas also. In this paper, I investigate the area of textual meanings as required by a small, experimental systemic-functional grammar of Japanese. I conclude that the methodology is, indeed, appropriate for uncovering textual meanings and needs to be pursued on a larger scale.

Keywords

Text Base Computational Linguistics Text Generation Natural Language Generation Grammatical Relation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. [1]
    Bateman, John A. (1985) `An initial fragment of a computational systemic grammar for Japanese’. Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Bateman, John A. (1986) `Text planning for a systemic-functional grammar of Japanese’. Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Kyoto University.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Bateman, John A. (1988) `Aspects of clause politeness in Japanese: an extended inquiry semantics treatment’. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Buffalo, New York, pp147–154. Also available as ISI Reprint Series report RS-88–211, USC/Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, California.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Bateman, John A. (1989) ‘Dynamic systemic-functional grammar: a new frontier’. Word, 40.1–2, 263–286. Also available as ISI Reprint Series report RS-89–217, USC/Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, California.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Bateman, John A., Kasper, Robert T., Moore, Johanna D., and Whitney, Richard A. (1989) `The Penman Upper Model — 1989’. Technical Report, USC/Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, California.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Bateman, John A., Kikui, Gen-ichiro, and Tabuchi, Atsushi. (1987) `Designing a computational systemic grammar of Japanese for text generation: a progress report’. Kyoto University, Dept. of Electrical Engineering.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Bateman, John A. and Li Hang (1988) `The application of systemic-functional grammar to Japanese and Chinese for use in text generation’. Proceedings of the 1988 International Conference on Computer Processing of Chinese and Oriental Languages, Toronto, Canada, August 29–September 1, 1988, pp 443–447.Google Scholar
  8. [8] Bateman, John A. and Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. (in preparation)
    Uncovering the text base’. Paper presented at the 1st. International Conference on Text and Language Research, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, P.R. China, March 1989. USC/Information Sciences Institute and Sydney University/Linguistics Department.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Bresnan, Joan (ed.)(1982) The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Chomsky, Noam (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Cinnaminson, N.J.: Foris.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Clancy, Patricia M. and Downing, Pamela (1987) ‘The use of wa as a cohesion marker in Japanese oral narratives’. In Hinds, J. op. cit., pp3–56.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Danes, Frantisek (1974) `Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text’. In Danes, Frantisek (ed.) Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, Academia, Prague, pp 106–128.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Davey, Anthony (1974) Discourse Production. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh; published by Edinburgh University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Fawcett, Robin P. and Tucker, Gordon H. (1989) `Prototype Generators 1 and 2’. Communal Project, Report 10. Computational Linguistics Unit, University of Wales College of Cardiff, Wales.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Fries, Peter (1981) `On the status of theme in English: arguments from discourse’. Forum Linguisticum, 6.1, 1–38.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Grosz, Barbara J. and Sidner, Candace L. (1986) `Attention, Intentions and the Structure of Discourse’. Computational Linguistics Journal, 12.3, 175–204.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Gunji, Takao (1987) Japanese Phrase Structure Grammar. Dordrecht: Rei-del Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Halliday, Michael A.K. (1978) Language as social semiotic. Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Halliday, Michael A.K. (1985) Introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Hinds, John (1983a) `Topic continuity in Japanese’. In Givón, T. (ed.) Topic continuity in discourse: a quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Hinds, John (1983b) `Case marking in Japanese’. Linguistics, 20, 541–557.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Hinds, John, Maynard, Senko K., and Iwasaki, Shoichi (1987) Perspectives on Topicalization: the case of Japanese `wa’. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Hovy, Eduard H. (1988) `Planning coherent multi-sentential text’. Proceedings of the 26th. Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Buffalo, New York, pp 163–167.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Hovy, Eduard H., McDonald, David D., Young, Sheryl, and Appelt, Doug (eds.)(1988) Proceedings of the 1st AAAI Workshop on Text Planning and Realization AAAI-88, Minnesota: St. Paul.Google Scholar
  25. [25] Hovy, Eduard H. and McCoy, Kathy F. (1989)
    Focusing your RST: A step towards generating coherent multisentential text’. Proceedings of the 11th. Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, August 16–19, 1989, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, p667–674.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Jackendoff, Ray (1983) Semantics and Cognition; The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Jackendoff, Ray (1987) `The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory’. Linguistic Inquiry, 18.3, 369–411.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Johnson, David E. (1988) `JETS: A Japanese-English Translation system based on Relational Grammar’. IBM Research Report, Tokyo Scientific Center, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Kogure, Kiyoshi (1988) `A method of analyzing Japanese Speech Act types’. ATR Technical Report, TR-I-0026. Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Kyoto, Japan.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Kume, Masako, Sato, Gayle K., Yoshimoto, Kei (1989) `A descriptive framework for translating speaker’s meaning: towards a dialogue translation system between Japanese and English’. In Proceedings of the,nth. Annual Meeting of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 264–271, UMIST, Manchester, England.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Kuno, Susumo (1972) `Functional sentence perspective’. Linguistic Inquiry, 3, pp 269–320.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Kuno, Susumo (1973) The structures of the Japanese language. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Kuno, Susumo (1976) `Subject, Theme and the Speaker’s Empathy’. In Li, C., (ed.) Subject and Topic, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Langacker, Ronald W. (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume 1, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Maeda, H., Kato, S., Kogure, K., Iida, H. (1988) ‘Parsing Japanese Honorifics in Unification-based Grammar’. Proceedings of the 26th. Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 139–146.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    Mann, William C. (1982) `The Anatomy of a Systemic Choice’, University of Southern California/Information Sciences Institute ISI/RR-82–104.Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    Mann, William C. (1983) `Systemic encounters with computation’. Network, 5, 27–32.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    Mann, William C. (1985) `An introduction to the Nigel text generation grammar’. In Benson, James D. and Greaves, William S. (eds.) Systemic Perspectives on Discourse: Selected Theoretical Papers from the 9th. International Systemic Workshop, Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Pub. Corp., pp 84–95.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    Mann, William C. and Thompson, Sandra A. (1987) `Rhetorical structure theory: description and construction of text structures’. In Kempen, Gerard (ed.)Natural Language Generation: Recent Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Psychology, and Linguistics, Boston/Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 85–96.Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. (1987) `Notes on the Organization of the environment of a text generation grammar’. In G. Kempen (ed.) Natural Language Generation: Recent Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Psychology, and Linguistics, Boston/Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. (1988) `Representational Issues in Systemic-functional grammar’. In Benson, James D. and Greaves, William S. (eds.) Systemic-functional approaches to discourse, Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    Maynard, Senko K. (1980) `Discourse functions of the Japanese theme marker wa’. Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University, Illinois.Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    Partee, Barbara (1975) `Montague Grammar and Transformational Grammar’. Linguistic Inquiry, 6, 203–300.Google Scholar
  44. [44]
    Patten, Terry (1986) Interpreting Systemic Grammar as a Computational Representation: A Problem Solving Approach to Text Generation. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Artificial Intelligence, Edinburgh University, Scotland.Google Scholar
  45. Shibatani, Masoyoshi (1976) ‘Causativization’. In Shibatani, M. Syntax and Semantics 5: Japanese Generative Grammar New York: Academic Press, pp239–294.Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    Shibatani, Masoyoshi (1977) ‘Grammatical relations and surface cases’. Language, 53. 4, 789–809.Google Scholar
  47. [47]
    Sugimura, R. (1986) `Japanese Honorifics and Situation Semantics’. In Coling-86, pp 507–510.Google Scholar
  48. [48]
    Tonoike, S. (1978) ‘On the Causative Construction in Japanese’. In Hinds, J. and Howard, I. Problems in Japanese Syntax and Semantics, Tokyo: Kaitakusha, pp 3–29.Google Scholar
  49. [49]
    Winograd, Terry (1972) Understanding Natural Language,Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • John A. Bateman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations