Thinking about Energy

  • David J. Rose
Part of the Modern Perspectives in Energy book series (MPIE)

Abstract

Solving the energy problem is very different from solving problems in energy. The latter—solving problems in energy—consists of calculations, such as imparting to an assistant secretary of energy of mass x kg an upward acceleration of y m/s2 in a gravitational field of g m/s2, then asking at some later time t about the secretary’s kinetic and potential energies. The former—the energy problem itself—is much more, and involves additional questions such as: “Was it a good idea?” and “Compared to what?” It is a sociotechnological condition that we did not want but brought upon ourselves nevertheless; having it, we hope to ameliorate it. But amelioration to some people means enhancing supply; to others, reducing demand. To some it means national independence; to others, reducing global tensions via international interdependence. To some it means environmental consequences of overuse; to others, economic consequences of doing without.

Keywords

Technology Assessment Energy Policy Energy Problem Hydro Conversion Apply System Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BNL (1975). Brookhaven National Laboratory. M. Beller (ed.), Sourcebook for Energy Assessment, Report BNL-50483, NTIS, Springfield, Virginia.Google Scholar
  2. CONAES (1980). Energy in Transition1985–2010, W. H. Freeman Co., San Francisco.Google Scholar
  3. Ford Foundation (1974). Energy Policy Project. A Time To Choose: Americas Energy Future, Ballinger Publishing Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  4. Häfele, W., et al (1981). Energy in a Finite World, Vol 1, Paths to a Sustainable Future. Prepared by the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (HASA), Austria, Ballinger Publishing Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  5. OTA (1975). Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress, “Analysis of the FY 1976 ERDA Budget” (March); “An Analysis of the ERDA Plan and Program” (October). U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402.Google Scholar
  6. Plato, Critias III A-C, as quoted by Arnold Toynbee (1972). A Study of History, revised and abridged ed., Oxford University Press, New York and London. Distributed in the U.S. by American Heritage Press, a division of McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, St. Louis, and San Francisco.Google Scholar
  7. Putnam, P. C. (1953). Energy in the Future, D. Van Nostrand Co., New York.Google Scholar
  8. Shell Oil Company (1972). “The National Energy Problem” (May).Google Scholar
  9. Shell Oil Company (1973). “The National Energy Outlook” (March).Google Scholar
  10. Singer, C, Holmyard, E. J., Hall, A. R., and Williams, T. I. (1954–58). History of Technology, Oxford University Press, New York and London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • David J. Rose
    • 1
  1. 1.Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations