Creativity

What are We to Measure?
  • Robert T. Brown
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives on Individual Differences book series (PIDF)

Abstract

Creativity consists of at least four components: (1) the creative process, (2) the creative product, (3) the creative person, and (4) the creative situation (MacKinnon, 1970; Mooney, 1963). It has been studied from so many frequently incompatible theoretical perspectives, each with its own assumptions, methodologies, biases, and even meta-theoretical view, that coverage of all in a single chapter is not possible. This chapter concentrates on the divergent thinking approach to the study of the creative process—an approach that has the most explicitly developed theoretical base, underlies most creativity tests, and has generated the most empirical research. Along the way, information on some other components and theoretical approaches will be presented. Most other approaches are covered in detail in other chapters in this handbook, and general presentations of creativity theories are in Albert (1983), Bloomberg (1973), Busse and Mansfield (1980), and Vernon (1970).

Keywords

Creative Process Divergent Thinking Creative Product Scientific Creativity Ideational Fluency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albert, R. S. (Ed.). (1983). Genius and eminence. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  2. Albrecht, K. (1980). Brain power. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Amabile, T. M. (1983a). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amabile, T. M. (1983b). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Austin, J. H. (1978). Chase, chance, and creativity. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Barron, F. (1968). Creativity and personal freedom. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  7. Barron, F., and Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bloomberg, M. (Ed.). (1973). Creativity: Theory and research. New Haven, CT: College and University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Boring, E. G. (1923). Intelligence as the tests test it. New Republic, 35, 35–37.Google Scholar
  10. Brewer’s dictionary of phrase and fable. (1962). ( 6th ed. ). London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  11. Buros, O. K. (Ed.). (1972). The seventh mental measurement yearbook. Highland Park, NJ: Gryphon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Buros, O. K. (Ed.). (1978). The eighth mental measurement yearbook. Highland Park, NJ: Gryphon Press.Google Scholar
  13. Busse, T. V., and Mansfield, R. S. (1980). Theories of the creative process: A review and a perspective. Journal of Creative Behavior, 14, 91–103, 132.Google Scholar
  14. Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carroll, J. B. (1968). [Review of The nature of human intelligence by J. P. Guilford]. American Educational Research Journal, 73, 105–112.Google Scholar
  16. Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  17. Claridge, G. (1987). Psychotism and arousal. In J. Strelau, and H. J. Eysenck (Eds.), Personality dimensions and arousal. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  18. Conant, J. B. (1947). On understanding science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Cronbach, L. J. (1984). Essentials of psychological testing ( 4th ed. ). New York: Harper, and Row.Google Scholar
  20. Crovitz, H. F. (1970). Gallon’s walk. New York: Harper, and Row.Google Scholar
  21. Detterman, D. K. (1979). Detterman’s laws of individual difference research. In R. J. Sternberg, and D. K. Detterman (Eds.), Human intelligence (pp. 165–175 ). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  22. Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston: D. C. Heath. Ericsson, K. A., and Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  23. Eysenck, H. J. (1979). The structure and measurement of intelligence. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eysenck, H. J., and Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Feldman, D. H. (1970). Faulty construct-ion. Contemporary Psychology, 15, 3–4.Google Scholar
  26. Feldman, D. H. (1980). Beyond universals in cognitive development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  27. Feldman, D. H. (1986). Nature’s gambit. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  28. Fox, H. H. (1963). A critique on creativity in science. In M. A. Coler (Ed.), Essays on creativity in the sciences (pp. 123152 ). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Freeman, F. N. (1924). Mental tests. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  30. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books. Getzels, J. W., and Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem solving in art. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Ghiselin, B. (Ed.). (1952). The creative process. New York: Mentor.Google Scholar
  32. Ghiselin, B. (1963). Ultimate criteria for two levels of creativity. In C. W. Taylor, and F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development (pp. 30–43 ). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Ghiselin, B., Rompel, R., and Taylor, C. W. (1964). A creative process check list: Its development and validation. In C. W. Taylor (Ed.), Widening horizons in creativity (pp. 19–33 ). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Gruber, H. E. (1981). Darwin on man ( 2nd ed. ). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of the intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267–293.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Guilford, J. P. (1959). Three faces of intellect. American Psychologist, 14, 469–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  39. Guilford, J. P. (1975). Creativity: A quarter century of progress. In I. A. Taylor, and J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 37–59 ). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  40. Guilford, J. P. (1977). Way beyond the IQ. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation.Google Scholar
  41. Guilford, J. P. (1982). Cognitive psychology’s ambiguities: Some suggested remedies. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 4859.Google Scholar
  42. Hacking, I. (Ed.). (1981). Scientific revolutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Harding, S. G. (Ed.). (1976). Can theories be refuted? Boston: Riedel.Google Scholar
  44. Hempel, C. G. (1966). Philosophy of natural science. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  45. Henle, M. (1962). The birth and death of ideas. In H. E. Gruber, G. Terrell, and M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking (pp. 31–62 ). New York: Atherton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Henle, M. (1974). The cognitive approach: The snail beneath the shell. In S. Rosner, and L. E. Abt (Eds.), Essays in creativity (pp. 23–44 ). Croton-on-Hudson, NY: North River Press.Google Scholar
  47. Hocevar, D. (1979). Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 191–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hocevar, D. (1980). Intelligence, divergent thinking, and creativity. Intelligence, 4, 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hocevar, D. (1981). Measurement of creativity: Review and critique. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 450–464.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Horn, J. L., and Knapp, J. R. (1973). On the subjective character of the empirical base of Guilford’s structure of intellect model. Psychological Bulletin, 80,33–43.Google Scholar
  51. Hudson, L. (1966). Contrary imaginations. London: Methuen. Humphreys, L. G. (1962). The organization of human abilities. American Psychologist, 17, 475–483.Google Scholar
  52. Jackson, P. W., and Messick, S. (1967). The person, the product, and the response: Conceptual problems in the assessment ofGoogle Scholar
  53. creativity. In J. Kagan (Ed.), Creativity and learning (pp. 1–19). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  54. Jones, E. E. (1979). The rocky road from acts to dispositions. American Psychologist, 34, 107–117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Khatena, J. (1984). Imagery and creative imagination. Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.Google Scholar
  56. Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. New York: Macmillan. Kogan, N. ( 1983 ). Stylistic variation in childhood and adolescence: Creativity, metaphor, and cognitive styles. In P. H.Google Scholar
  57. Mussen, J. H. Flavell, and E. M. Markman (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (4th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 630–706). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  58. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  59. Kuhn, T. S. (1963). The essential tension: Tradition and innovation in scientific research. In C. W. Taylor, and F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development (pp. 341–354 ). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  60. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of research programmes. In I. Lakatos, and A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 8–101 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Lakatos, I. (1978). Philosophical papers. Vol I: The methodology of scientific research programmes (J. Worrall, and G. Currie, Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Lakatos, I., and Musgrave, A. (Eds.). (1970). Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Landau, E. (1985). Creative questioning for the future. In J. Freeman (Ed.), The psychology of gifted children (pp. 379–392 ). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  64. MacCorquodale, K., and Meehl, P. E. (1948). On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. MacKinnon, D. W. (1962). The personality correlates of creativity: A study of American architects. In S. Coopersmith (Ed.), Personality research, Vol. 2 of G. S. Nielsen (Ed.), Proceedings of the XIV International Congress of Applied Psychology (pp. 11–39 ). Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
  66. MacKinnon, D. W. (1965). Personality and the realization of creative potential. American Psychologist, 20, 273–281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. MacKinnon, D. (1970). Creativity: A multi-faceted phenomenon. In J. D. Roslansky (Ed.), Creativity: A discussion at the Nobel conference (pp. 17–32 ). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  68. Maltzman, I. (1960). On the training of originality. Psychological Review, 67, 229–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mansfield, R. J., and Busse, T. V. (1981). The psychology of creativity and discovery. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  70. McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mednick, S. A., and Mednick, M. T. (1964). An associative interpretation of the creative process. In C. W. Taylor (Ed.), Widening horizons in creativity (pp. 54–68 ). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  73. Meeker, M. (1969). The structure of intellect: Its interpretation and uses. Columbus, OH: Merrill.Google Scholar
  74. Michael, W. B. (1977). Cognitive and affective components of creativity in mathematics and the physical sciences. In J. C. Stanley, W. C. George, and C. H. Solano (Eds.), The gifted and the creative: A fifty-year perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., and Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Miller, N. E. (1959). Liberalization of basic S-R concepts: Extensions to conflict behavior, motivation and social learning. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 2, pp. 196–292 ). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  77. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  78. Mooney, R. L. (1963). A conceptual model for integrating four approaches to the identification of creative talent. In C. W. Taylor, and F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development (pp. 331–340 ). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  79. Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., and Simon, H. A. (1962). The processes of creative thinking. In H. E. Gruber, G. Terrell, and M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking (pp. 63–119 ). New York: Atherton Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Nicholls, J. G. (1972). Creativity in the person who will never produce anything original and useful: The concept of creativity as a normally distributed trait. American Psychologist, 27, 717–727.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Pezzullo, T. R., Thorsen, E. E., and Madaus, G. F. (1972). The heritability of Jensen’s level I and II and divergent thinking. American Educational Research Journal, 9, 539–546.Google Scholar
  82. Popper, K. R. ( 1935, trans. 1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  83. Poincaré, H. (1913). The foundations of science. Lancaster, PA: Science Press.Google Scholar
  84. Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 174–220 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  85. Rossman, J. (1931). The psychology of the inventor: A study of the patentee. Washington, DC: Inventors Publishing Co. Rothenberg, A. (1979). The emerging goddess: The creative process in art, science, and other fields. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  86. Simonton, D. K. (1984). Genius, creativity, and leadership: Historiometric inquiries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Spearman, C. (1931). Creative mind. New York: Appleton. Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. Journal of Personality, 36, 311–322.Google Scholar
  88. Sternberg, R. J. (1979). Intelligence research at the interface between differential and cognitive psychology: Prospects and proposals. In R. J. Sternberg, and D. K. Detterman (Eds.), Human intelligence (pp. 33–60 ). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  89. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 607–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triarchic theory of intellectual giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg, and J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 223–243 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Sternberg, R. J., and Davidson, J. E. (1986). Cobnitive development in the gifted and talented. In F. D. Horowitz, and M. O’Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 37–74 ). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  92. Sternberg, R. J., and Detterman, D. K. (Eds.). (1979). Human intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  93. Sternberg, R. J., and Detterman, D. K. (Eds.). (1986). What is intelligence? Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  94. Taylor, C. W. (1947). A factorial study of fluency in writing. Psychometrika, 12, 239–262.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Taylor, C. W., and Barron, F. (Eds.). (1963). Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  96. Taylor, C. W., and Ellison, R. L. (1975). Moving toward working models in creativity: Utah creativity experiences and insights.Google Scholar
  97. In I. A. Taylor, and J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 191–223). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  98. Taylor, C. W., and Holland, J. (1964). Predictors of creative performance. In C. W. Taylor (Ed.), Creativity: Progress and potential (pp. 15–48 ). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  99. Thomdike, R. L. (1963). Some methodological issues in the study of creativity. In Proceedings of the 1962 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems (pp. 40–54 ). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  100. Torrance, E. P. (1961). Factors affecting creative thinking in children: An interim research report. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 7, 171–180.Google Scholar
  101. Torrance, E. P. (1975). Creativity research in education: Still alive. In I. A. Taylor, and J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  102. Turner, M. B. (1968). Psychology and the philosophy of science. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  103. Vernon, P. E. (Ed.). (1970). Creativity. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Pengu in Books.Google Scholar
  104. Wallach, M. A. (1970). Creativity. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (3rd ed., pp. 12111272 ). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  105. Wallach, M. A. (1971). The intelligence/creativity distinction. New York: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  106. Wallach, M. A. (1986). Creativity testing and giftedness. In F. D. Horowitz, and M. O’Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 99–123 ). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  107. Wallach, M. A., and Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. Wallach, M. A., and Wing, C. W., Jr. (1969). The talented student. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  108. Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  109. Weisberg, R. W. (1986). Creativity: Genius and other myths. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  110. Welsh, G. S. (1975). Creativity and intelligence: A personality approach. Chapel Hill, NC: Institute for Research in Social Science.Google Scholar
  111. Welsh, G. S. (1986). Positive exceptionality: The academically gifted and the creative. In R. T. Brown, and C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on childhood exceptionality: A handbook (pp. 311–343 ). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  112. Wertheimer, M. (1959). Productive thinking (enlarged ed.). New York: Harper, and Row.Google Scholar
  113. Zigler, E., and Butterfield, E. C. (1968). Motivational aspects of changes in IQ test performance of culturally deprived nursery group school children. Child Development, 39, 1–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert T. Brown
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of North Carolina at WilmingtonWilmingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations