Electrical Properties (Focused Current and Spontaneous Potential) Logging
In this chapter I continue the discussion of resistivity logging with focused current resistivity tools and the natural borehole potential or spontaneous potential (SP) log.
KeywordsApparent Resistivity Spontaneaus Potential Undisturbed Zone Hybrid Scale Drill Stem Test
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Roberto Aguilera, Naturally Fractured Reservoirs ( Petroleum Publishing Company, Tulsa, Okla., 1980 ), pp. 200–220.Google Scholar
- 2.Schlumberger, Log Interpretation, Volume 1, Principles ( Schlumberger Ltd, New York, 1972 ), p. 22.Google Scholar
- 3.Schlumberger, Log Interpretation Charts ( Schlumberger Ltd, New York, 1986 ).Google Scholar
- 4.Schlumberger, Log Interpretation, Volume 1,p. 22.Google Scholar
- 5.Ibid., p. 25.Google Scholar
- 6.R. Woodhouse, “The Laterolog Groningen Phantom Can Cost You Money,” paper presented at the 19th Annual Logging Symposium of the Society of Professional Well Logging Analysts, June 1978.Google Scholar
- 7.Schlumberger, Log Interpretation, Volume 1, p. 25.Google Scholar
- 8.Woodhouse, “Laterolog Groningen Phantom.”Google Scholar
- 11.George R. Pickett, “Application of Log Quality Control to Evaluation Problems,” paper used with class notes for petrophysics course presented at the Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, 1976.Google Scholar
- 15.G. S. Neinast and C. C. Knox, “Normalization of Well Log Digitizing,” The Log Analyst 15, no. 2 (1974): 18–25.Google Scholar
- 16.Author’s class notes from course on advanced well log interpretation presented by George R. Pickett at the Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, 1976.Google Scholar
- 17.Schlumberger, Log Interpretation, Volume 1,pp. 35–36.Google Scholar
- 18.Author’s class notes from a course on well log interpretation presented by George R. Pickett at the Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, 1975.Google Scholar
- 21.H. G. Doll, “The SP Log: Theoretical Analysis and Principles of Interpretation,” Pub. No. 2463 ( American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers, New York, 1948 ).Google Scholar
- 22.Author’s class notes, 1975.Google Scholar
- 24.Lee M. Etnyre, “Discussion” in “Letters to the Editor,” The Log Analyst 26, no. 1 (1985): 2–5.Google Scholar
- 25.Zaki Bassiouni and Diane M. Matthews, “Resistivity-Spontaneous Potential Crossplot for Enhanced Interpretation of Well Logs,” The Log Analyst 25, no. 5 (1984): 11–19.Google Scholar
© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1989