Electrical Properties (Induction) Logging

  • Lee M. Etnyre

Abstract

Resistivity, an electrical property, was the first rock property logged in a well, and it is still one of the most important properties logged. Recall from Chapter 3 that most water saturation calculations are based on establishing a ratio of resistivities. If we compare a rock’s resistivity to the resistivity it would have at 100% water saturation, we can calculate the water saturation from Archie’s equation. Then we can infer that the balance of the pore spaces are occupied by hydrocarbon. However, we must resist the temptation to draw the apparently logical conclusion that the resistivity curves recorded on a log are saturation curves. A low resistivity does not by itself mean there is a high water saturation. We must still compare the resistivity to the value it would have if saturated with water. This requires knowledge of the rock’s porosity as well as its resistivity.

Keywords

Apparent Resistivity True Resistivity Ground Loop Deep Induction Undisturbed Zone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hubert Guyod, Guyod’s Electrical Well Logging, a reprint of 16 articles that appeared in various issues of the Oil Weekly between August 7, 1944 and December 4, 1944 ©1944 by Welex, a division of Halliburton Company, Houston, Texas, 1944.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Douglas W. Hilchie, Old (pre-1958) Electrical Log Interpretation (Douglas W. Hilchie, Inc., Golden, Colo., 1979 ).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Author’s class notes from course on well log interpretation presented by George R. Pickett at the Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, 1975.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. G. Doll, “Introduction to Induction Logging and Application to Logging of Wells Drilled without Oil Base Mud,” Journal of Petroleum Technology 1 (1949): 148–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Author’s class notes, 1975.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. A. S. Elkington and H. K. Patel, “Invasion Profile from the Digital Induction Log,” paper presented at the 26th Annual Logging Symposium of the Society of Professional Well Logging Analysts, Dallas, June 1985.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barbara Anderson, “Induction Sonde Response in Stratified Media,” The Log Analyst 24, no. 1 (1983): 25–31.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. L. Dumanoir, M. P. Tixier, and Maurice Martin, “Interpretation of the Induction-Electrical Log in Fresh Mud,” Journal of Petroleum Technology (July 1957).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Author’s class notes, 1975.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. H. Moran and K. S. Kunz, “Basic Theory of Induction Logging and Application to Two-Coil Sondes,” Geophysics 27, no. 6 (1962): 829–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. H. Hardman and L. C. Shen, “Theory of Induction Sonde in Dipping Beds,” Geophysics 51, no. 3 (1986): 800–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    James H. Moran, “Induction Logging-Geometrical Factors with Skin Effect,” The Log Analyst 23, no. 6 (1982): 4–10.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Barbara Anderson, “The Analysis of Some Unsolved Induction Interpretation Problems Using Computer Modeling,” The Log Analyst 27, no. 5 (1986): 60–73.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lee M. Etnyre

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations