The Future of Macroeconomic Policy in the European Union

  • Christopher Allsopp
Chapter

Abstract

To make a presentation on the future of macroeconomic policy making in the EU is a daunting task. Until recently, this would have involved analysing macroeconomic developments in 15 countries. With the start of EMU in 1999, and now with the successful launch of the euro itself, the task looks, on the surface, a little easier — since the 12 countries of the euro area begin to look more like a macroeconomic entity: there is, after all, a single currency and a single monetary policy for the twelve, with only three countries (Sweden, Denmark and the UK) still outside. But even if one puts aside the position of the “outs”, the macroeconomic issues facing Europe are complex and unusual. A centralised monetary policy, determined by a constitutionally independent European Central Bank (the ECB), interacts with twelve different and politically independent fiscal authorities and twelve different labour markets. Even to describe the system in this way suggests that coordination issues, between a centralised monetary policy and national fiscal policies and between different countries’ labour market policies are likely to be at the heart of the European policy debate over the coming years.

Keywords

Interest Rate Monetary Policy Central Bank Fiscal Policy Euro Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alesina, A., Blanchard, O., Gall, J., Giavazzi, F., Uhlig, H., Defining a macroeconomic framework for the euro area, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London, 2001.Google Scholar
  2. Allsopp, C.J., Davies, G., Vines, D., “Regional macroeconomic policy, fiscal federalism, and European integration”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 1995, 11 (2), pp. 126–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allsopp, C.J., Vines, D., “Fiscal policy and EMU”, National Institute Economic Review, October, 1996, pp. 91–107.Google Scholar
  4. Allsopp, C.J., Vines, D., “The assessment: macroeconomic policy after EMU”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 1998, 14 (3), pp. 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allsopp, C.J., Vines, D., “The assessment macroeconomic policy”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2000, 16 (4), pp. 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balls, E, E., “Delivering economic stability”, Speech delivered to Oxford Business School Alumni Association Annual Lecture, Merchant Taylor’s Hall, 12 June, 2001.Google Scholar
  7. Batini, N., Haldane, A., “Forward-looking rules for monetary policy”, in Taylor, J.B. (Ed.), Monetary policy rules, NBER Conference Report series, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1999, pp. 157–192.Google Scholar
  8. Batini, N., Yates, A., “Hybrid inflation and price level targeting”, Bank of England Working Paper, 2001, (135).Google Scholar
  9. Bean, C., “The new monetary arrangements: a view from the literature”, Economic Journal, 1998, 108 (451), pp. 1795–1809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buti, M., Franco, D., Ongena, H., “Fiscal discipline and flexibility in EMU: the implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 1998, 14 (3), pp. 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Calmfors, L., “Macroeconomic policy, wage setting and employment: what difference does EMU make?”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 1998, 14 (3), pp. 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cecchetti, S.G., “The European Central Bank: a view from across the ocean”, paper presented at the Conference on EMU Macroeconomic Institutions, Univesita di Milano-Bicocca, September 2001, available at http://economics.sbs.ohio-state.edu/cecchetti/.Google Scholar
  13. Clarida, R., Gali, J., Gertler, M., “Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: evidence and some theory”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2000, 147 (1), pp. 147–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. European Commission, The EU economy 2001 review, European Economy, 2001, (73).Google Scholar
  15. Gatti, D., van Wijnbergen, C., “Coordinating fiscal authorities in the eurozone: a key role for the ECB”, Oxford Economic Papers, 2002, 54 (1), pp. 56–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Issing, O., Gaspar, V., Angeloni, I., Tristani, O., Monetary policy in the euro area, Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  17. King, M.A., “The inflation target five years on”, speech to the London School of Economics, 29 October 1997, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, 1997, 37 (4), pp. 434–442.Google Scholar
  18. King, M.A., “Challenges for monetary policy: new and old”, in New challenges for monetary policy: A symposium sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 1999, pp. 11–57.Google Scholar
  19. Kohn, D., Report to the non-executive directors of the court of the Bank of England on monetary policy processes and the work of monetary analysis, Bank of England, 2000.Google Scholar
  20. Kydland, F.E., Prescott, E.C., “Rules rather than discretion: the inconsistency of optimal plans”, Journal of Political Economy, 1977, 85 (3), pp. 473–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MacDougall, D, D., “Report of the study group on the role of public finances in the European integration” (MacDougall Report (I-II)), European Commission, 1977.Google Scholar
  22. Nelson, E., Nikolov, K., “UK inflation in the 1970s and 1980s: the role of output gap mismeasurement”, Bank of England Working Paper, 2001, (148).Google Scholar
  23. O’Donnell, G., Bhundia, A., “UK policy coordination: the importance of institutional design”, Fiscal Studies, (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  24. Orphanides, A., “The quest for prosperity without inflation”, ECB Working Paper, 2000, (15).Google Scholar
  25. Sala-I-Martin, X., Sachs, J., “Fiscal federalism and optimum currency areas: evidence for Europe from the United States”, in Canzoneri, M., Grilli, V., Masson, R. (Eds.), Establishing a central bank: issues in Europe and lessons from the United States, Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Svensson, L.E.O., “The first year of the eurosystem: inflation targeting or not?”, American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 2000, 90, pp. 95–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Taylor, J.B., “Discretion versus policy rules in practice”, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1993, 39 (1), pp. 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Taylor, J.B., “Alternative views of the monetary transmission mechanism: what difference do they make for monetary policy?”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2000, 16 (4), pp. 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vickers, J., “Inflation targeting in practice: the UK experience”, Speech at the Conference on implementation of price stability held in Frankfurt, 11 September, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, 1998, 38 (4), pp. 368–375.Google Scholar
  30. Von Hagen, J, “Fiscal arrangements in a monetary union: evidence from the US”, in Deboissieu, C., Fair, D.E. (Eds.), Fiscal policy, taxes and the financial system in an increasingly integrated Europe, Deventer, Kluwer, 1992, pp. 337–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Allsopp

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations