Epilogue

  • Bruce Dorminey
Chapter

Abstract

Halfway through the year 2001, NASA announced a new mission to the Solar System’s innermost planet Mercury, for launch in early 2004, and renewed concept studies for a possible mission to Pluto within the same time frame. The novel aspects of both missions remind us that even as the number and variety of planets known to circle other stars continue to mount, we have much to learn about our own Solar System. At the same time, we can be encouraged that astronomers continue to find remnants and parts of other planetary systems that appear to mirror the most salient parts of our own. In February 2001, infrared observations made at the Keck Observatory by UCLA astronomers Christine Chen and Michael Jura indicated that a massive asteroid belt orbits the young (estimated 100 million-year old) star Zeta Leporis, some 21 parsecs away from Earth in the constellation Lepus.1 Then, in June 2001, the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI) reported that Hubble observations of microlensing events in the Globular Cluster M22, some 2,600 parsecs away in Sagittarius, picked up the signatures of free-floating planetary-type objects with minimum masses only 80 times that of Earth. As reported in Nature, monitoring 83,000 background stars behind M22 between February and June 1999, the team observed six events in which a background star jumped in brightness by some 50 percent for less than 20 hours. This short brightening of the background star indicates the foreground microlens is being created by a very low-mass object, not unlike an ejected planet. If these observations can be verified, these objects are very likely planets that have been “detached” (or gravitationally ejected or torn) from their orbits around their parent stars. To confirm these events, the team is planning more observations over a continuous seven-day period.2

Keywords

Solar System Globular Cluster Planetary System Planet Formation Kuiper Belt 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Astronomers Identify Evidence of Asteroid Belt Around Nearby Star: Findings Indicate Potential for Planet or Asteroid Formation.“ UCLA press release (June 4, 2001).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    “M22.” Students for the Exploration and Development of Space (SEDS) chapter at the University of Arizona’s Lunar and Planetary Laboratory. http://www.seds.lpl.arizona.edu/messier (December 9, 1999). ”Wandering Mystery Planets.“ NASA Science News (June 29, 2001). ”Hints of Planet-Sized Objects Bewilder Hubble Scientists.“ JPL press release (June 27, 2001). Sahu, Kailash C. et al.”Gravitational Microlensing by Low-Mass Objects in the Globular Cluster M22.“ Nature 411 (June 28, 2001): 1022.
  3. 3.
    Marcy, Geoffrey, astronomer, University of California at Berkeley Private communication with the author on May 10–12 and June 3, 2001.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Trilling, D. E. and R. H. Brown. “Imaging a Circumstellar Disk Around a Star with a Radial-Velocity Planetary Companion.” Paper presented at the AAS DPS meeting, August 11, 1998.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alexander, Amir. “Extra Solar Planets or Small Stars?” The Planetary Society Daily Online News, http://www.planetaryorg/html.news (October 31, 2000). Han, Inwoo, David C. Black, and George D. Gatewood. “Preliminary Astrometric Masses for Proposed Extra-Solar Planetary Companions.” Paper presented at the 2000 Meeting of the Division for Planetary Sciences of the American Astronomical Society, Pasadena, California, October 23–27, 2000. “Some New Planets Might Be Stars, Researchers Say” University of Pittsburgh news release (October 28, 2000 ).
  6. 6.
    Gatewood, George D., astrometrist, Director of Allegheny Observatory, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Private communication with the author on June 25, 2001.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    van Leeuwen, Floor, astronomer, University of Cambridge, U.K. Interviewed on October 29, 1999, and on June 26, 2001.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lineweaver, Charles H. ‘An Estimate of the Age Distribution of Terrestrial Planets in the Universe: Quantifying Metallicity as a Selection Effect.“ Icarus 151 (2001): 307. Lineweaver, Charles H., physicist, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Private communication with the author on June 28–29, 2001.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    NASA Establishes Contact with Famed Pioneer 10 Spacecraft.“ NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, press release (April 30, 2001). ”Most Distant Spacecraft May Reach Shock Zone Soon.“ NASA JPL press release (December 18, 2000).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neufeld, David, SWAS team member and astrophysicist, The Johns Hopldns University, Baltimore, Maryland. Interviewed on July 12, 2001.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Most Distant Spacecraft May Reach Shock Zone Soon.“ NASA JPL press release (December 18, 2000). ”NASA Establishes Contact with Famed Pioneer 10 Spacecraft.“ NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, press release (April 30, 2001).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    de Duve, Christian René 1995. Vital Dust: Life as a Cosmic Imperative. New York: Basic Books: 301.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce Dorminey
    • 1
  1. 1.ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations