Knowledge Reuse in Project Management

  • Jillian Owen
  • Frada Burstein
  • William P. Hall
Conference paper

Abstract

This paper discusses the initial stages of a research in progress addressing knowledge reuse issues in a project management environment and explores how project management companies manage project knowledge. The project tests the statement that the effective transfer of tacit, implicit and explicit knowledge plays a critical role in a project management environment.

The paper presents concepts drawn from the literature covering ways that knowledge is captured and reused in project management context.

We propose a model for knowledge reuse in a project management environment where knowledge is assimilated at the tactical level and flows to the strategic level. This model derives from two prior models: the OODA loop — Observe, Orient, Decide, Act, which focuses on strategic requirements and the Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) cycle, which focuses on the operational or tactical level of projects. Both the OODA Loop and the PDSA Cycle are adaptive learning and decision-making cycles where changes or actions are produced via iterated cycling through that loop.

The initial aim is to use these models as a starting point for analysing and describing how the organization currently captures, manages and reuses knowledge in a project management environment.

Keywords

Project Management Knowledge Management Tacit Knowledge Explicit Knowledge Intellectual Capital 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boyd, J. R., 1996, The essence of winning and losing, Retrieved May 5, 2003 from the World Wide Web: http://www.belisarius.com /modem_business_strategy/boyd/essence/eowl_frarveset.htm
  2. Cooper, K.G. and Lyneis, J.N., 2002, Learning to learn from past to future, International Journal of Project Management, 20 (3) 213–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Damm, D. and Schindler, M., 2002, Security issues of a knowledge medium for distributed project work, International Journal of Project Management, 20 (1), 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deming, W. E., 1992, Out of the crisis,Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Disterer, G., 2002, Management of project knowledge and experiences, Journal of Knowledge Management, 6 (5), 512–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Edison, T., 2002, Rugby and the ooda loop, Retrieved on January 29, 2003 from the World Wide Web: http://www.belisarius.com/modem_busincss_strategy/edison/rugby_ooda_loop.htm
  7. Hall, W. P., 2003, Organisational Autopoiesis and Knowledge Management, paper submitted for ISD Twelfth International Conference on Information Systems Development.Google Scholar
  8. Hammond, K. H., 2002, The strategy of the fighter pilot. Fastcompany, June. Retrieved April 15, 2003 from the World Wide Web: http://www.fastcompany.com/online/59/pilot.htm
  9. Hasan, H., 2001, A knowledge architecture using activity as the key unit of analysis, in: Proceedings of Australian Conference for Knowledge Management and Intelligent Decision Support, 184–199.Google Scholar
  10. Komi-Sirvio, S., Mantyniemi, A. and Sepannen, V., 2002, Towards a practical solution for capturing knowledge for software projects, IEEE Software, 19 (3), 60–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Koskinen, K. U., 2000, Tacit knowledge as a promoter of project success, European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 6 (1), 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kotnour, T., 1999, A learning framework for project management, Project Management Journal, 30 (2), 32–38.Google Scholar
  13. Kotnour, T., 2000, Organizational learning practices in the project management environment, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 17 (4/5) 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liebowitz, J., 2002, A look at NASA Goddard space flight center’s knowledge management initiatives, IEEE Software, 19 (3), 40–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Matthews, M. M., 2000, Knowledge-driven profit improvement: implementing assessment feedback using PDKAction theory, Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press.Google Scholar
  16. Nahapiet, J., and Ghosal, S., 1998, Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage, Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 23 (2), 242–266.Google Scholar
  17. Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G., 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  18. Nickols, F., 2000, The knowledge in knowledge management, in: The Knowledge Management Yearbook 2001–2002, J. W. Cortada and J.A. Woods, eds., Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  19. Project Management Institute, 2000, A guide to the project management body of knowledge, Project Management Institute.Google Scholar
  20. Snowden, D., 2002, Complex acts of knowing: paradox and descriptive self awareness, Journal of Knowledge Management, 6 (2), 100–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stake, R. E., 2000, Case Studies, in: Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.), N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, eds., Sage Publications, pp. 435–454.Google Scholar
  22. Thompson, F., 1993, The boyd cycle and business strategy, Proceedings of the Aomori-Atkinson Conference, Aomori Public College, Aomori, Japan. Retrieved October 17, 2002 from the World Wide Web: http://www.belisarius.com /modem business_strategy/thompson/first_with_most.htm
  23. Trochim, W. M. K., 2002, Research methods knowledge base. Retrieved May 5, 2003 from the World Wide Web: http://trochim.human.comell.edu/kb/
  24. Von Krogh, G. and Roos, J., 1995, Organizational Epistemology,MacMillan Press Ltd.Google Scholar
  25. Walsh, J. P. and Ungson, J. R., 1991, Organizational memory, Academy of Management Review, 16 (1), 57–91.Google Scholar
  26. Wilson. G. I., 1997, Business is war. Retrieved on January 29, 2003 from the World Wide Web: http://www.belsiarius.com/modcrn_business_strategy/wilson/boyd_symposium_1997

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jillian Owen
    • 1
  • Frada Burstein
    • 1
  • William P. Hall
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Information Management and Systems (SIMS)Monash UniversityAustralia
  2. 2.Tenix DefenceWilliamstownAustralia
  3. 3.School of Information Management & SystemsMonash University CaulfieldAustralia

Personalised recommendations