Perspectives for Future Economic Policy Coordination within EMU

  • Kurt Bayer
Chapter

Abstract

There is widespread consensus that the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) at its outset did not represent an optimal currency area (e.g., Breuss, 1997, 169). Markets within EMU are not perfect. The EU Treaty states that institutions at the community and member states level are called upon to handle economic problems in such a way that the objectives of Art. 2 of the Treaty will be achieved.1 This can be read to mean that the community and member states institutions’ are required to strive for a policy mix conducive to growth and employment, in order to raise the standard of living of EU citizens.2

Keywords

Member State Monetary Policy Fiscal Policy Euro Area European Central Bank 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allsopp, Ch. and Vines, D. (1966) ‘Fiscal Policy and EMU’, National Institute Economic Review 4, 158.Google Scholar
  2. Bayer, Kurt, Katterl, Alfred, and Wieser, Thomas (1998) ‘Economic Policy in EMU: National Necessities and Coordination Requirements’, Working Papers 1/1998, Federal Ministry of Finance, Vienna.Google Scholar
  3. Bayoumi, T. and Eichengreen, B. (1995) ‘Restraining Yourself: The Implications of Fiscal Rules for Economic Stabilization’, IMF Staff Papers 42, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  4. Begg, D., de Grauwe, P., Giavazzi, F., Uhlig, H. and Wyplosz, Ch. (1998) The ECB: Safe at Any Speed?’, Monitoring the European Central Bank, Vol. 1, Center for Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
  5. Breuss, Fritz (1997) `Überblick über die theoretischen Überlegungen zur “optimum currency area”’, in J. Baumgartner, F. Breuss, H. Kramer, and E. Walterskirchen (eds.), Auswirkungen der Wirtschafts-and Währungsunion, Österreichisches, Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung. Wien.Google Scholar
  6. Buti, M., Franco, D. and Ongena, Hedwig (1997) ‘Budgetary Policies during Recessions— Retrospective Application of the “Stability and Growth Pact” to the Post-War Period’, Economic Papers, Nr. 121, European Commission II/195/97-EN, Brussels.Google Scholar
  7. CEPS (1999) `Macroeconomic Policy in the First Year of Euroland’, 1st Annual Report of the CEPS Macroeconomic Policy Group, Brussels.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission (1997) ‘Economic Policy in EMU: Part A: Rules and Adjustment’, Economic Papers, Nr. 124, II/0452/97-EN, Brussels.Google Scholar
  9. European Commission (1997b) `Economic Policy in EMU: Part B: Specific Topics’, Economic Papers, Nr. 125, 11/0453/97-EN Revised, Brussels.Google Scholar
  10. European Commission (1999) ‘Economic Forecasts 1999–2000’, Spring 1999, I1/137–138/99, Brussels.Google Scholar
  11. von Hagen, Jürgen (1999) ‘The EMU’s Stability Pact: Flexibility and Effectiveness to Assure Sustainable Public Finances’, preliminary paper, Bonn.Google Scholar
  12. IMF (1998) World Economic Outlook,International Monetary Fund, May, Washington, D.C. IMF (1999) World Economic Outlook,International Monetary Fund, May, Washington, D.C. OECD (1999a) Macroeconomic and Structural Policies for a Successful Monetary Union: An Overview, ECO/GEN(99)1, Paris.Google Scholar
  13. OECD (1999b) Economic Outlook 65,May,Paris.Google Scholar
  14. OECD (1999c)’Revised Secretariat Projections for OECD Economic Outlook No. 65’, Room Document for the Economic Policy Committee No. 1, May 6, Paris.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kurt Bayer
    • 1
  1. 1.Austrian Ministry of FinanceWienAustria

Personalised recommendations