In Vitro Fluid Dynamics of St. Jude, Ionescu-Shiley and Carpentier-Edwards Aortic Heart Valve Prostheses

  • A. P. Yoganathan
  • W. H. Corcoran
  • E. C. Harrison
  • A. Chaux

Abstract

In the study reported here the in vitro fluid dynamic characteristics of the St. Jude (mechanical bi-leaflet), Carpentier-Edwards (porcine) and Ionescu-Shiley (calf peri­cardial) aortic valve prostheses were investigated. The experiments conducted were (a) pressure drop measurements, (b) preliminary photography of the opening of the tissue valve leaflets, and (c)velocity and shear stress measurements. The pressure drop, velocity and shear stress measurements were conducted under steady flow conditions, while the preliminary photography studies were conducted under steady and pulsatile flow conditions. The pressure drop results indicated that the St. Jude and Hall-Kaster valves have the lowest pressure drops compared to any of the other valves used clinically at present. The two bioprostheses had larger pressure drops than would be expected for their basic designs. The smaller sizes of the Carpentier-Edwards valve had excessively large pressure-drops. The photographs of the opening of the valve leaflets indicated that the two bioprostheses do not open as ideally as the natural aortic valve. It was also observed that the Ionescu-Shiley aortic valves opened more symmetrically and with reproducability than the corresponding Carpentier-Edwards valves.

Detailed velocity and shear stress measurements were made with a laser-Doppler anemometer system. These measure­ments indicated that the flow that emerged from the leaflets of both types of tissue valves was jet-like and could lead to turbulent shear stresses on the order of 1000–3000 dynes /cm2. Such turbulent shear stresses could be harmful to blood components. The jet type flow could also damage the the wall of the ascending aorta. Velocity measurements in the immediate downstream vicinity of the St. Jude valve showed that the flow field which emerged from the valve was centralized. The velocity measurements also indicated that there was a region of flow separation adjacent to the vessel wall and immediately downstream from the sewing ring. Such a region of flow separation could lead to excessive tissue overgrowth along the aortic side of the sewing ring. All three types of valve designs, however, created relatively low wall shear stresses on the order of 100–600 dynes/cm2. This result is definitely a positive aspect of these valves when you consider that most of the rigid aortic prostheses we have studied created wall shears on the order of 1000–3000 dynes/cm2.

Keywords

Heart Valve Valve Leaflet Prosthetic Heart Valve Turbulent Shear Stress Pressure Drop Measurement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, G. H., Hellums, J. D., Moake, J., and Alfrey, C.P. (1978) Platelet response to shear stress: changes in serotonin release, and ADP induced aggregation, Thrombosis Res. 13, 1039–1047.Google Scholar
  2. Broom, N. D. (1978) Fatigue induced damage in glutaraldehydepreserved heart valve tissue, J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 76, 202–211.Google Scholar
  3. Dellsperger, K. C., and Wieting, D. W. (1979) Presented at the 14th Annual AAMI Meeting, Las Vegas.Google Scholar
  4. Ferrans, V. J., Spray, T. L., Billingham, M. E., and Roberts, W. C. (1978) Structural changes in gluteraldehyde-treated porcine hetrografts used as substitute cardiac vlaves, Am. J. Cardiol. 41, 1159–1184.Google Scholar
  5. Gabbay, S., McQueen, D. M., Yellin, E. L., and Frater, R. W. M. (1979) In vitro hydrodynamic comparison of mitral valve bioprostheses. To be published in Supplement to Circulation, Cardiovascular Surgery.Google Scholar
  6. Hellums,J. D., and Brown III, C. H. (1977) Blood cell damage by mechanical forces. Cardiovascular Flow Dynamics (Edited by N. H. C. Hwang and N. A. Norman) University Park Press, Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
  7. Ionescu, M. I., Tanden, A. P., Mary, D. A. S., Abid, A. (1977) Heart valve replacement with the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenografts.J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 73, 31–42.Google Scholar
  8. Ramstack, J. M., Zuckerman, L., and Mockros, L. F. (1979)Google Scholar
  9. Shear induced activation of platelets, J. Biomech. 12, 113–125.Google Scholar
  10. Spray, T. L., and Roberts, W. C. (1977) Structural changes in porcine xenografts used as substitute cardiac valves, Am. J. Cardiol. 40, 319–330.Google Scholar
  11. Stinson, E. B., Griepp, R. B., Oyer, P. E., and Shumway, N.E. (1977) Long-term experience with porcine aortic valve xeno-grafts, J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 73,54–63.Google Scholar
  12. Yoganathan, A. P., (1978) Cardiovascular fluid mechanics, Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  13. Yoganathan, A. P., Corcoran, W. H., and Harrison, E. C. (1978) Wall shear stress measurements in the near vicinity of prosthetic aortic heart valves, J. Bioeng. 2, 369–379.Google Scholar
  14. Yoganathan, A. P., Corcoran, W. H., and Harrison, E.C. (1979a) In vitro velocity measurements in the vicinity of aortic prostheses. J. Biomech. 12, 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Yoganathan, A. P., Reamer, H. H., Corcoran, W.H., and Harrison, E. C. (1979b) A laser-Doppler anemometer to study velocity fields in the vicinity of prosthetic heart valves, Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 17, 38–44.Google Scholar
  16. Yoganathan, A. P., Corcoran, W. H., and Harrison, E. C. (1979c) Pressure drops across prosthetic aortic heart valves under steady and pulsatile flow–in vitro measurements, J. Biomech 12, 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. P. Yoganathan
    • 1
  • W. H. Corcoran
    • 2
  • E. C. Harrison
    • 3
  • A. Chaux
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Chemical EngineeringGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Chemical Engineering LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA
  3. 3.Cardiology SectionUSC-LA County Medical CenterLos AngelesUSA
  4. 4.Dept. of Thoracic SurgeryCedars-Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations