Advancing Behaviorism in a Judeo-Christian Culture

Suggestions for Finding Common Ground
  • Chad M. Galuska

Abstract

The relationship between science and religion has been described as warfare (Draper, 1874/1897; White, 1896/1960). This characterization is undoubtedly too strong. Indeed, Gould (1999) has argued that it is false, fueled more by political agendas than historical fact. Nevertheless, it is undeniable that conflicts between science and religion have occurred, and often have been well publicized. The trial of Galileo in 1633 is perhaps the prime example of the persecution of science by a dogmatic theology. Three centuries later, opposition to Darwinian thought resulted in the media circus surrounding the Scopes vs. Tennessee (1925) trial. Today, fundamentalist Christians in some parts of the United States continue to oppose the teaching of evolution in public schools, and new conflicts are emerging where science has outpaced the current system of ethics, such as in the case of human cloning.

Keywords

Moral Responsibility Behavior Analysis Behavior Analyst Ethical System Positive Reinforcer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aquinas, T. (1963). Summa theologica (Vol 18). Blackfriars: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  2. Arnhart, L. (1998). The search for a Darwinian science of ethics. Science and Spirit, 9, 4–7.Google Scholar
  3. Bailey, J. S. (1991). Marketing behavior analysis requires different talk. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 445–448.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baum, W. M. (1994). Understanding behaviorism: Science, behavior, and culture. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  5. Begelman, D. A. (1977). Commentary. In J. E. Krapfl & E. A. Vargas (Eds.), Behaviorism and ethics (pp. 24–28). Kalamazoo: Behaviordelia, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Catechism of the Catholic Church (1994). New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  7. Chein, I. (1972). The science of behavior and the image of man. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Chiesa, M. (1994). Radical behaviorism: The philosophy and the science. Boston: Authors Cooperative, Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Day, W. (1977). Ethical philosophy and the thought of B. F. Skinner. In J. E. Krapfl & E. A. Vargas (Eds.), Behaviorism and ethics (pp. 7–23). Kalamazoo: Behaviordelia, Inc.Google Scholar
  10. Dennett, D. C. (1984). Elbow room: The varieties of free will worth wanting. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dinsmoor, J. A. (1992). Setting the record straight: The social views of B. F. Skinner. American Psychologist, 47, 1454–1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Drange, T. M. (1998). Nonbelief & evil: Two arguments for the nonexistence of God. Amherst: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  13. Draper, J. W. (1897). History of the conflict between religion and science. New York: Appleton & Company. (Original work published in 1874)Google Scholar
  14. Durant, W. (1960). The story of philosophy ( 8th ed.). New York: Pocket Books. (Original work published in 1926)Google Scholar
  15. Gazda, G. M., & Corsini, R. J. (1980). Theories of learning: A comparative approach. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Geller, E. S. (1995a). Actively caring for the environment: An integration of behaviorism and humanism. Environment and Behavior, 27, 184–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geller, E. S. (1995b). Integrating behaviorism and humanism for environmental protection. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gould, S. J. (1999). Rocks of ages: Science and religion in the fullness of life. New York: Ballentine.Google Scholar
  19. Grunbaum, A. (1953). Causality and the science of human behavior. In H. Fiegl & M. Brodbeck (Eds.), Readings in the philosophy of science (pp. 766–778). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  20. Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modern science. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
  21. Hineline, P. N. (1980). The language of behavior analysis: Its community, its functions, and its limitations. Behaviorism, 8, 67–86.Google Scholar
  22. Howard, G. S. (1994). Some varieties of free will worth practicing. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 14, 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mazur, J. E. (1994). Learning and behavior. ( 3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  24. McKinsey, C. D. (1995). The encyclopedia of biblical errancy. Amherst Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  25. New International Version Bible. Retrieved from http://www.niv.org/ on January 11, 2002.
  26. Plass, E. M. (1959). What Luther says: An anthology. (Vol III). St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House.Google Scholar
  27. Platt, J. R. (1973). The Skinnerian revolution. In H. Wheeler (Ed.), Beyond the punitive society (pp. 22–56). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  28. Rockwell, W. T. (1994). Beyond determinism and indignity: A reinterpretation of operant conditioning. Behavior and Philosophy, 22, 53–66.Google Scholar
  29. Rubenstein, R. L. (1971, September). Beyond freedom and dignity by B. F. Skinner. Psychology Today, pp. 28–31, 95–96.Google Scholar
  30. Rychlak, J. F. (1992). Free will: “Doing otherwise all circumstances remaining the same.” In B. Slife & J. Rubinstein (Eds.), Taking sides: Clashing views on controversial psychological issues (7th ed., pp. 65–71). Guilford, Connecticut: Dushkin Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  31. Schnaitter, R. (1977). Behaviorism and ethical responsibility. In J. E. Krapfl & E. A. Vargas (Eds.), Behaviorism and ethics (pp. 29–47). Kalamazoo: Behaviordelia, Inc.Google Scholar
  32. Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research. New York: Basic Books. (Reprinted, 1988. Boston: Authors Cooperative.)Google Scholar
  33. Sidman, M. (1989). Coercion and its fallout. Boston, MA: Author’s Cooperative.Google Scholar
  34. Sigmund, P. E. (Ed.). (1988). St. Thomas Aquinas on politics and ethics. New York: W. N. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  35. Skinner, B. F. (1948). Walden two. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  36. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  37. Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
  38. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  39. Slife, B. D., Yanchar, S. C., & Williams, B. (1999). Conceptions of determinism in radical behaviorism: A taxonomy. Behavior and Philosophy, 27, 75–96.Google Scholar
  40. Staddon, J. E. R. (2001). The new behaviorism: Mind, mechanism, and society. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  41. Vorsteg, R. H. (1974). Operant reinforcement theory and determinism. Behaviorism, 2, 108–119.Google Scholar
  42. Wheeler, H. (Ed.). (1973). Beyond the punitive society. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  43. White, A. D. (1960). A history of the warfare of science with theology in Christendom. New York: Dover Publications. (Original work published in 1897)Google Scholar
  44. Zuriff, G. (1987). Naturalist ethics. In. S Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), B. F. Skinner: Consensus and controversy (pp. 309–318). New York: Fulmer Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chad M. Galuska
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWest Virginia UniversityMorguntownUSA

Personalised recommendations