Too Many and Too Few Limitations for Children

  • Michael B. Rothenberg

Abstract

The conjunction in the middle of the title of this chapter seems to me to characterize the current status of this situation quite accurately. Too many and too few limitations plague our children and ourselves, and indeed, in the same family, both situations may be present simultaneously. As the pressure has increased on physicians, among others, to provide society with some solution to this dilemma, we have often tended to provide a prescription which draws heavily from what I call the “unholy trinity” of activity / authority / magic. Traditionally, our patients have expected us to go about solving their problems in a highly active manner, our actions carried out with maximum authority, and with both doctor and patient tacitly accepting the reassurance provided for both parties by the “magic” of medicine. It is my impression that we do our patients and ourselves a disservice when we attempt to respond in this manner to the highly complex issues which are represented by children’s and parents’ questions concerning too many and too few limitations. Paul Goodman (1964), whom many college students attempted to make into one of their folk heros, pointed out to those of our children who consider themselves in the vanguard of various “anti-Establishment” movements in recent years, that their greatest weakness, and thus the greatest danger to the success of their cause, is the fact that “they have no sense of history.” We adults, as we attempt to respond to the question of limitations, also seem often to have little or no historical perspective.

Keywords

Sexual Freedom Friday Night Hart Publishing Progressive School Discipline Home 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avedon, R., and J. Baldwin. 1964. Nothing Personal. New York, Dell Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Crawshaw, R. 1967. Letter. In Medical Opinion and Review, 3, 2.Google Scholar
  3. Eisenbud, R. 1971. Structured for freedom. In Notes from Stevenson, No. 2. Lucille Rhodes, ed. Robert Lewis Stevenson School, 24 W. 74th Street, New York, N.Y. 10023.Google Scholar
  4. Erikson, E. 1950. Childhood and Society. New York, W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  5. Goodman, P. 1964. The Community of Scholars. New York, Random House.Google Scholar
  6. Johnson, A. M. 1949. Sanctions for superego lacunae of adolescents. In Searchlights on Delinquency. New York, International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  7. Neill, A. S. 1960. Summerhill: A Radical Approach to Child Rearing. New York, Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Neill, A. S. 1966. Freedom—Not License. New York, Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Perrin, N. 1972. Before fun city. In The New Yorker, February 26.Google Scholar
  10. Plant, J. S. 1937. Personality and the Cultural Pattern. New York, Commonwealth Fund.Google Scholar
  11. Rothenberg, E. B., and M. B. Rothenberg. 1970. Violence: story and commentary. In The Educational Forum, November.Google Scholar
  12. Rothenberg, M. B. 1969. Violence and children. In Mental Hygiene, 53, 4.Google Scholar
  13. Shoben, E. J. 1969. Demonstrations, confrontations, and academic business as usual. In Western Humanities Review, 23, 1.Google Scholar
  14. Stone, L. J., and J. Church. 1968. Childhood and Adolescence. 2nd ed. New York, Random House.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael B. Rothenberg

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations