## Abstract

Until recently, percolation was a game that was played largely on the plane. There is a special reason why percolation in two dimensions is more approachable than percolation in higher dimensions. To every planar two-dimensional lattice ℒ there corresponds a ‘dual’ planar lattice ℒ where

_{d}whose edges are in one-one correspondence with the edges of ℒ; furthermore, in a natural embedding of these lattices in the plane, every finite connected subgraph of ℒ is surrounded by a circuit of ℒ_{d}. Each edge of ℒ corresponds to a unique edge of ℒ_{d}, so that the percolation process on ℒ generates a percolation process on ℒ_{d}. In this dual pair of processes, the origin of ℒ is in an infinite open cluster if and only if it is in the interior of no closed circuit of ℒ_{d}; such observations may be used to show that, in certain circumstances, ℒ contains an infinite open cluster if and only if ℒ_{d}contains no infinite closed cluster (almost surely), which is to say that$$
p_c \left( L \right) + p_c \left( {L_d } \right) = 1$$

(9.1)

*p*_{ c }(ℒ) and*p*_{ c }(ℒ_{d}) are the associated critical probabilities. We saw a similar argument in the proof of Theorem (1.10), where it was shown that the square lattice is self-dual in the sense that the dual lattice of ℤ^{2}is isomorphic to ℤ^{2}. Equation (9.1) implies immediately in this case that*p*_{ c }(ℤ^{2}) = 1/2, the celebrated exact calculation proved by Kesten (1980a) using arguments based on work of Harris, Russo, Seymour, and Welsh.## Keywords

Open Circuit Central Limit Theorem Open Cluster Closed Circuit Closed Path
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## Notes

- Hammersley, J. M. 1959 Bornes supérieures de la probabilité critique dans un processus de filtra-tion, in
*Le Calcul des Probabilités et ses Applications*, 17–37, CNRS, Paris.Google Scholar - Harris, T. E. 1960 A lower bound for the critical probability in a certain percolation process,
*Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society*56, 13–20.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bondy, J. A. and Murty, U. S. R. 1976
*Graph Theory with Applications*, Macmillan, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar - Kesten, H. 1982
*Percolation Theory for Mathematicians*, Birkhäuser, Boston.MATHGoogle Scholar - Sykes, M. F. and Essam,
**J**. W. 1964 Exact critical percolation probabilities for site and bond problems in two dimensions,*Journal of Mathematical Physics*5, 1117–1127.Google Scholar - Wierman, J.C.1981 Bond percolation on honeycomb and triangular lattices,
*Advances in Applied Probability*13, 293–313.Google Scholar - Kesten, H. 1980a The critical probability of bond percolation on the square lattice equals Z,
*Communications in Mathematical Physics*74, 41–59.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Harris, T. E. 1960 A lower bound for the critical probability in a certain percolation process,
*Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society*56, 13–20.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Russo, L. 1978 A note on percolation,
*Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete*43, 39–48.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Seymour, P. D. and Welsh, D. J. A. 1978 Percolation probabilities on the square lattice, in
*Advances in Graph Theory*, ed. B. Bollobâs, 227–245, Annals of Discrete Mathematics 3, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar - Chayes, J. T., Chayes, L., and Fröhlich, J. 1985 The low-temperature behavior of disordered magnets,
*Communications in Mathematical Physics*100, 399–437.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Chayes, J. T., Chayes, L., Grimmett, G. R., Kesten, H., and Schonmann, R. H. 1988 The correlation length for the high density phase of Bernoulli percolation,
*Annals of Probability*, to appear.Google Scholar - Cox, J. T. and Durrett, R. 1988 Limit theorems for the spread of epidemics and forest fires,
*Stochastic Processes and their Applications*, to appear.Google Scholar - Chayes, J. T. and Chayes, L. 1986a Percolation and random media, in
*Critical Phenomena*,*Random Systems and Gauge Theories*, Les Houches, Session XLIII, 1984, eds. K. Osterwalder and R. Stora, 1001–1142, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar - Cox,J.T. and Grimmett, G. R. 1981 Central limit theorems for percolation models,
*Journal of Statistical Physics*25, 237–251.Google Scholar - Grimmett, G. R. 1985a On a conjecture of Hammersley and Whittington concerning bond percolation on subsets of the simple cubic lattice,
*Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General*18, L49 — L52.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Grimmett, G. R.
*1985b The largest components in a random lattice*Studia Scientiarum Mathematicarum Hungarica 20, 325–331.Google Scholar - Grimmett, G. R. 1985a On a conjecture of Hammersley and Whittington concerning bond percolation on subsets of the simple cubic lattice,
*Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General*18, L49 — L52.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Herrndorf, N. 1985 Mixing conditions for random fields in percolation theory, preprint.Google Scholar
- Berg, J. van den and Keane, M. 1984 On the continuity of the percolation probability function, in
*Conference on Modern Analysis and Probability*, ed. R. Beals et al., 61–65, Contemporary Mathematics 26, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island.Google Scholar

## Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1989