Children as Legal Actors

  • Gary B. Melton

Abstract

Just as the idea of a handbook of psychology and law would have seemed farfetched until relatively recently, a chapter on children1 as legal actors would have made no sense until recent time in legal history. Although some provision was present even in Roman law for age-graded responsibility through the defense of infancy (Ludwig, 1950), little legal recognition of children’s interests separate from those of the community or their parents (specifically, their father) occurred before the late 19th century (Levine, Ewing, & Hager, 1987). Indeed, the classic treatises on the early English (Blackstone, 1876) and American (Kent, 1828/1896) common law considered children’s law largely in regard to the status of illegitimate children—such provisions themselves linking the status of children to the behavior of their parents.

Keywords

Juvenile Justice Legal Actor Legal Process Juvenile Court Mock Juror 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adelman, H.S., Lusk, R., Alvarez, V., & Acosta, N.K. (1985). Competence of minors to understand, evaluate, and communicate about their psychoeducational problems. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16, 426–434.Google Scholar
  2. Adelman, H.S., & Taylor, L. (1986). Children’s reluctance regarding treatment: Incompetence, resistance, or an appropriate response? School Psychology Review, 15, 91–99.Google Scholar
  3. Babb, H.W. (1937). Petrazhitskii: Science of legal policy and theory of law. Boston University Law Review, 17, 793–829.Google Scholar
  4. Babb, H.W. (1938). Petrazhitskii: Theory of law. Boston University Law Review, 18, 511–575.Google Scholar
  5. Bastien, R.T., & Adelman, H.S. (1984). Non-compulsory versus legally mandated placement, perceived choice, and response to treatment among adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 171–179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bellotti v. Baird, 443 U.S. 622 (1979).Google Scholar
  7. Benshoof, J., & Pine, R. (1986, March 24). Memorandum from American Civil Liberties Union Reproductive Freedom Project on the trial of Hodgson v. Minnesota. New York: American Civil Liberties Union.Google Scholar
  8. Blackstone, W. (1876). In R.W. Kerr (Ed.), Commentaries on the law of England (4th Ed., Vol. 1). London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  9. Blum, R.W., Resnick, M.D., & Stark, T.A. (1987). The impact of a parental notification law on adolescent abortion decision-making. American Journal of Public Health, 77, 619–620.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bonner, B.L., & Everett, F.L. (1986). Influence of client preparation and problem severity on attitudes and expectations in child psychotherapy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 17, 223–229.Google Scholar
  11. Brigham, T.A. (1979). Some effects of choice on academic performance. In L.C. Perlmuter & R.A. Monty (Eds.), Choice and perceived control (pp. 131–141). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Bush, M. (1980). Institutions for dependent and neglected children: Therapeutic option of choice or last resort? American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 50, 239–225.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bush, M., & Gordon, A.C. (1978). Client choice and bureaucratic accountability: Possibilities for responsiveness in a social welfare bureaucracy. Journal of Social Issues, 34 (4), 22–43.Google Scholar
  14. Cartoof, V.G., & Klerman, L.V. (1986). Parental consent for abortion: Impact of the Massachusetts law. American Journal of Public Health, 76, 397–400.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Carey v. Population Services International, 431 U.S. 678 (1977).Google Scholar
  16. City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, 462 U.S. 416 (1983).Google Scholar
  17. Clarke, S.H., & Koch, G.G. (1980). Juvenile court: Therapy or crime control, and do lawyers make a difference? Law and Society Review, 14, 263–308.Google Scholar
  18. Coy v. Iowa, 108 S.Ct. 2798 (1988).Google Scholar
  19. Dahl, T.S. (1985). In G. Nyquist (trans.), Child welfare and social defence. Oslo: Norwegian University Press. (Original work published 1978).Google Scholar
  20. Dawson, R.E., Prewitt, K., & Dawson, K.S. (1977). Political socialization (2nd Ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  21. Donovan, P. (1983). Judging teenagers: How minors fare when they seek court-authorized abortions. Family Planning Perspectives, 15, 259–267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Duggan, L.M., III, Aubrey, M., Doherty, E., Isquit, P., Levine, M., & Scheiner, J. (1989). The credibility of children as witnesses in a simulated child sex abuse trial. In S.J. Ceci, D.F. Ross, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on children’s testimony (pp. 71–99). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  23. Dunivant, N. (1984). A causal analysis of the relationship between learning disabilities and juvenile delinquency. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.Google Scholar
  24. Falk, P.J., Wolfe, D., & Perry, G.S. (in prep.). Perceptions of factors influencing an attorney’s choice of representation styles in juvenile delinguency adjudications. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  25. Feld, B.C. (1988a). In re Gault revisited: A cross-state comparison of the right to counsel in juvenile court. Crime and Delinquence, 34, 393–424.Google Scholar
  26. Feld, B.C. (1988b). The juvenile court meets the principle of offense: Punishment, treatment, and the difference it makes. Boston University Law Review, 68, 821–915.Google Scholar
  27. Feld, B.C. (1989). The right to counsel in juvenile court: An empirical study of when lawyers appear and the difference they make. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 79, 1185–1346.Google Scholar
  28. Garbarino, J., Stott, F.M., & Paculty of the Erikson Institute. (1989). What children can tell us: Eliciting, interpreting, and evaluating information from children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  29. Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U.S. 629 (1968).Google Scholar
  30. Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, 457 U.S. 596 (1982).Google Scholar
  31. Goodman, G.S. (1989). The emotional effects on child sexual assault victims of testifying in criminal cases. Final report to the National Institute of Justice, U.S. Dept. of Justice.Google Scholar
  32. Goodman, G.S., Aman, C., & Hirschman, J. (1987). Child sexual and physical abuse: Children’s testimony. In S.J. Ceci, M.P. Toglia, & D.F. Ross (Eds.), Children’s eyewitness memory (pp. 1–23). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  33. Goodman, G.S., Bottoms, B.L., Herscovici, B.B., & Shaver, P. (1989). Determinants of the child victim’s perceived credibility. In S.J. Ceci, D.F. Ross, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on children’s testimony (pp. 1–22). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  34. Goodman, G.S., Golding, J.M., Helgeson, V.S., Haith, M.M., & Michelli, J. (1987). When a child takes the stand: Jurors’ perception of children’s eyewitness testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 27–40.Google Scholar
  35. Goodman, G.S., Levine, M., Melton, G.B., & Ogden, D.W. (1991). Brief of amicus curiae American Psychological Association in Maryland v. Craig. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 13–29.Google Scholar
  36. Grisso, T. (1980). Juveniles’ capacity to waive Miranda rights: An empirical analysis. California Law Review, 68, 1134–1166.Google Scholar
  37. Grisso, T. (1981). Juveniles’ waiver of rights: Legal and psychological competence. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  38. Grisso, T. (1983). Juveniles’ consent in delinquency proceedings. In G.B. Melton, G.P. Koocher, & N.J. Saks (Eds.), Children’s competence to consent (pp. 131–148). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  39. Grisso, T., Miller, M.O., & Sales, B. (1987). Competency to stand trial in juvenile court. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 10, 1–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Grisso, T., & Pomicter, C. (1977). Interrogation of juveniles: An empirical study of procedures, safeguards, and rights waiver. Law and Human Behavior, 1, 321–342.Google Scholar
  41. Grisso, T., & Ring, M. (1979). Parents’ attitudes toward juveniles’ rights in interrogation. Cirminal Justice and Behavior, 6, 221–226.Google Scholar
  42. Hess, R.D., & Torney, J.V. (1967). The development of political attitudes in children. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  43. Hodgson v. Minnesota, 110 S.Ct. 2926 (1990).Google Scholar
  44. Holmes, D.S., & Urie, R.G. (1975). Effects of preparing children for psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 311–318. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Kent, J. (1896). In J.M. Gould (Ed.), Commentaries on American law (Vol. 2, 14th Ed.). Boston: Little, Brown. (Original work published 1828)Google Scholar
  46. Kentucky v. Stincer, 482 U.S. 730 (1987).Google Scholar
  47. Kett, J.F. (1977). Rites of passage. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  48. Lefstein, N., Stapleton, V., & Teitelbaum, L. (1969). In search of juvenile justice: Gault and its implementation. Law and Society Review, 3, 491–562.Google Scholar
  49. Leippe, M.R., & Romanczyk, A. (1987). Children on the witness stand: A communication/ persuasion analysis of jurors’ reaction to child witnesses. In S.J. Ceci, M.P. Toglia, & D.F. Ross (Eds.), Children’s eyewitness memory (pp. 155–177). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  50. Leippe, M.R., & Romanczyk, A. (1989). Reactions to child (versus adult) eyewitnesses: The influence of jurors’ preconceptions and witness behavior. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 103–132.Google Scholar
  51. Levine, M., Ewing, C.P., & Hager, R. (1987). Juvenile and family mental health law in socio-historical context. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 10, 91–109.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Lewis, C.E. (1983). Decision making related to health: When could/should children act responsibly? In G.B. Melton, G.P. Koocher, & M.J. Saks (Eds.), Children’s competence to consent (pp. 75–91). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  53. Lidz, C.W., Gross E., Meisel, A., & Roth, L.H. (1980). The rights of juveniles in “voluntary” psychiatric commitments: Some empirical observations. Bulletin of the American Acadeny of Psychiatry and Law, 8, 168–174.Google Scholar
  54. Limber, S.P., Melton, G.B., & Rahe, S.J. (1990, March). Leqal knowledge, attitudes, and reasoning abilities of witnesses. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, Williamsburg, VA.Google Scholar
  55. Lind, E.A., & Tyler, T.R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  56. Ludwig, F. (1950). Rationale of responsibility for young offenders. Nerbraska Law Review, 29, 521–546.Google Scholar
  57. Macauley, S. (1987). Imges of law in everyday life: The lessons of school, entertainment and spectator sports. Law and Society Review, 21, 185–218.Google Scholar
  58. Maryland v. Craig, 110 S.Ct. 3157 (1990).Google Scholar
  59. Melton, G.B. (1980). Children’s concepts of their rights. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 9, 186–190.Google Scholar
  60. Melton, G.B. (1981a). Children’s competency to testify. Law and Human Behavior, 5, 73–85.Google Scholar
  61. Melton, G.B. (1981b). Effects of a state law permitting minors to consent to psychotherapy. Professional Psychology, 12, 647–654.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Melton, G.B. (1983). Making room for psychology in Miranda doctrine: Juveniles’ waiver of rights. Law and Human Behavior, 7, 67–85.Google Scholar
  63. Melton, G.B. (1984). Developmental psychology and the law: The state of the art. Journal of Family Law, 22, 445–482.Google Scholar
  64. Melton, G.B. (Ed.). (1986). Adolescent abortion: Psychological and legal issues. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  65. Melton, G.B. (1987a). Bringing psychology to the legal system: Opportunities, obstacles, and efficacy. American Psychologist, 42, 488–495.Google Scholar
  66. Melton, G.B. (1987b). Legal regulation of adolescent abortion: Unintended effects. American Psychologist, 42, 79–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Melton, G.B. (Ed.). (1987c). Reforming the law: Impact of child development research. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  68. Melton, G.B. (1987d). The clashing of symbols: Prelude to child and family policy. American Psychologist, 42, 345–354.Google Scholar
  69. Melton, G.B. (1988). The significance of law in the everyday lives of children and families. Georgia Law Review, 22, 851–895.Google Scholar
  70. Melton, G.B. (1989a). Are adolescents people? Problems of liberty, entitlement, and responsibility. In J. Worell & F. Danner (Eds.), The adolescent as decision-maker (pp. 281–306). San Diego: CA Academic Press.Google Scholar
  71. Melton, G.B. (1989b). Respect for dignity: Blueprint for children’s law in the welfare state. Barn [Children], 1989(40), 73–95.Google Scholar
  72. Melton, G.B. (1989c). Taking Gault seriously: Toward a new juvenile court. Nebraska Law Review, 68, 146–181.Google Scholar
  73. Melton, G.B. (1990a). Law, science, and humanity: The normative foundation of social science in law. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 315–332.Google Scholar
  74. Melton, G.B. (1990b, August). Promoting justice: Psychologists in the new juvenile and family court. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychologist Association, Boston.Google Scholar
  75. Melton, G.B. (1991a). Preparing sexually abused children for testimony: Children’s perceptions of the leqal process. Report to the National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect (Grant No. 90-CA-1274).Google Scholar
  76. Melton, G.B. (1991b). Socialization in the global community: Respect for the dignity of children. American Psychologist, 46, 66, 71.Google Scholar
  77. Melton, G.B., Koocher, G.P., & Saks, M.J. (Eds.). (1983). Children’s competence to consent. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  78. Melton, G.B., & Limber, S. (1989). Psychologists’ involvement in cases of child maltreatment: Limits of role and expertise. American Psychologist, 44, 1225–1233.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Melton, G.B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N.G., & Slobogin, C. (1987). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  80. Melton, G.B., & Saks, M.J. (1985). The law as an instrument of socialization and social structure. In G.B. Melton (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 33. The law as a behavioral instrument (pp. 235–277). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  81. Melton, G. B., & Stanley, B.H. (in press). The psychology of research involving special populations. In B.H. Stanley, J. Sieber, & G.B. Melton (Eds.), Psychology and research ethics. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  82. Melton, G.B., & Thompson, R.A. (1987). Getting out of a rut: Detours to less traveled paths in child witness research. In S.J. Ceci, M.P. Toglia, & D.F. Ross (Eds.), Children’s eyewitness memory (pp. 209–229). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  83. Mnookin, R.H., & Weisberg, D.K. (1989). Child, family, and state (2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  84. Mnookin, R.H. (1985). Bellotti v. Baird: A hard case. In R.H. Mnookin (Ed.), In the interest of children: Advocacy, law reform, and public policy (pp. 149–264). New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  85. Nigro, G.N., Buckley, M.A., Hill, D.E., & Nelson, J. (1989). When juries “hear” children testify: The effects of eyewitness age and speech style on jurors’ perceptions of testimony. In S.J. Ceci, D.F. Ross, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on children’s testimony (pp. 57–70). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  86. O’Barr, W.M. (1982). Linguistic evidence. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  87. Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc., HOS.Ct. 2972(1990).Google Scholar
  88. Patrick, J.J. (1977). Political socialization and political education in schools. In S.A. Renshon (Ed.), Handbook of political socialization: Theory and research (pp. 190–222). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  89. Perlmuter, L.C., & Monty, R.A. (Eds.). (1979). Choice and perceived control. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  90. Perry, G.S. (1983). Representational styles in juvenile court: Eenie, meenie, miney, moe. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.Google Scholar
  91. Petrazhitskii, L.J. (1955). Law and morality (H.W. Babb, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1904–1910).Google Scholar
  92. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Dan-forth, 438 U.S. 52 (1976).Google Scholar
  93. Piatt, A.M. (1977). The child savers: The invention of delinquency (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  94. Piatt, A.M., & Friedman, R. (1968). The limits of advocacy: Occupational hazards in juvenile court. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 116, 1156–1184.Google Scholar
  95. Rex v. Brasier, 1 Leach 199, 168 Eng. Rep. 202 (1770).Google Scholar
  96. Riviin, L.G., & Wolfe, M. (1985). Institutional settings in children’s lives. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  97. Rosen, C.E. (1977). The impact of an open campus program upon high school students’ sense of control over their environment. Psychology in the Schools, 14, 216–219.Google Scholar
  98. Ross, D.F., Dunning, D., Toglia, M.P, & Ceci, S.J. (1989). Age stereotypes, communication modality, and mock jurors’ perceptions of the child witness. In S.J. Ceci, D.F. Ross, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on children’s testimony (pp. 37–56). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  99. Ross, D.F., Miller, B.S., & Moran, P.B. (1987). The child in the eyes of the jury: Assessing mock jurors’ perceptions of the child witness. In S.J. Ceci, M.P. Toglia, & D.F. Ross (Eds.), Children’s eyewitness memory (pp. 142–154). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  100. Roth, E.A. (1982). Children’s self-images: Before, during, and after psychiatric hospitalization. American Journal of Art Therapy, 21, 125–131.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Roth, E.A., & Roth, L.H. (1984, April). Children’s feelings about psychiatric hospitalization: Legal and ethical implications. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Orthopsychiatric Association, Toronto.Google Scholar
  102. Runyan, D.K., Everson, M.D., Edelsohn, G.A., Hunter, W.M., & Coulter, M.L. (1988). Impact of legal intervention on sexually abused children. Journal of Pediatrics, 113, 647–653.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Saywitz, K.J. (1989). Children’s conception of the legal system: “Court is a place to play basketball”. In S.J. Ceci, D.F. Ross, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on children’s testimony (pp. 131–157). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  104. Schwartz, I.M. (1989). (In) justice for juveniles: Rethinking the best interests of the child. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  105. Sigel, R.S., & Hoskin, M.B. (1981). The political involvement of adolescents. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  106. Stapleton, W.V., & Teitelbaum, L. (1972). In defense of youth: A study of the role of counsel in American juvenile courts. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  107. Tapp, J.L., & Levine, F.J. (1974). Legal socialization: Strategies for an ethical legality. Stanford Law Review, 27, 1–72.Google Scholar
  108. Tapp, J.L., & Melton, G.B. (1983). Preparing children for decision making: Implications of legal socialization research. In G.B. Melton, G.P. Koocher, & M.J. Saks (Eds.), Children’s competence to consent (pp. 215–233). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  109. Taylor, L., Adelman, H.S., & Kaser-Boyd, N. (1985). Exploring minors’ reluctance and dissatisfaction with psychotherapy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16, 418–425.Google Scholar
  110. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School district, 393 u.s. 503 (1969).Google Scholar
  111. Tyler, T.R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  112. United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, G.A. Res 25, 44 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 49) at 167, UN Doc. A/44/736 (1989).Google Scholar
  113. Wadlington, W., Whitebread, C.H., & Davis, S.H. (1983). Children in the legal system: Cases and materials. Mineola, NY: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  114. Warren-Leubecker, A., Tate, C.S., Hinton, I.D., & Ozbek, I.N. (1989). What do children know about the legal system and when do they know it? First steps down a less traveled path in child witness research. In S.J. Ceci, D.F. Ross, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on children’s testimony (pp. 158–183). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  115. Weisberg, K. (1984). The “discovery” of sexual abuse: Experts’ role in legal formulation. U.C. Davis Law Review, 18, 1–57.Google Scholar
  116. Weithorn, L.A. (1983). Involving children in decisions affecting their own welfare: Guidelines for professionals. In G.B. Melton, G.P. Koocher, & M.J. Saks (Eds.), Children’s competence to consent (pp. 235–260). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  117. Wells, G.L., Turtle, J.W., & Luus, C.A.E. (1989). The perceived credibility of child eyewitnesses: What happens when they use their own words. In S.J. Ceci, D.F. Ross, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on children’s testimony (pp. 23–36). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  118. Wheeler v. United States, 159 U.S. 523 (1895).Google Scholar
  119. Yates, S., & Pliner, A.J. (1988). Judging maturity in the courts: The Massachusetts consent statute. American Journal of Public Health, 78, 646–649.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Zimring, F.E. (1982). The changing world of legal adolescence. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary B. Melton

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations