Competency to Stand Trial

  • Lenore E. A. Walker
  • David L. Shapiro
Chapter

Abstract

In the last chapter we learned how the criminal justice system provides for someone who commits a crime without having the requisite mental state. In this chapter we shall learn about what happens to someone who is mentally ill and cannot understand their charges or the court proceedings or cannot help her or his attorney provide a defense. While this is a separate issue from mental state at the time of the offense, sometimes a person who is found to have been insane at the time of the offense had also been found incompetent to proceed to trial at an earlier time. Assessing the person’s mental state at a particular time after being charged with a crime is called ‘competence to stand trial’ and we have developed some basic rules that must be followed so that the person is treated fairly. Remember, in the Common Law legal system the U.S. and other countries have adapted, a person must be considered innocent until proven guilty. This process cannot occur if the person cannot assist the attorney at trial.

Keywords

Criminal Justice System Mental Health Professional Trial Court Delusional Disorder Civil Commitment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Grisso, T. (1988). Competency to stand trial: A manual for practice. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resources Press.Google Scholar
  2. Grisso, T. (1998). Instruments for Understanding & Appreciation of MIRANDA Rights. Professional Resources Press: Sarasota, FL.Google Scholar
  3. Grisso, T. & Borum, R. (2002). Evaluating Competencies: Forensic Assessments and Instruments. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Hoge, S.K., Bonnie, R.J., Poythress, N.G., Monahan, J. (1997). MacArthur Competency Assessment Tool for Criminal Adjudication (MacCAT-CA). Lutz, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Monahan, J. (1981). The Clinical Prediction of Violent Behavior. Washington DC: Government Printing office.Google Scholar
  6. Perlin, M. (2001). Mental disability on trial. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  7. Perlin, M. (1999). Mental disability law. Durham N.C.: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lenore E. A. Walker
    • 1
  • David L. Shapiro
    • 1
  1. 1.Nova Southeastern UniversityFt. LauderdaleUSA

Personalised recommendations