Summary and Reflections Upon Further Developments

  • Ove Granstrand
Chapter

Abstract

This concluding chapter summarizes the preceding chapters, using a common structure, which throughout the chapters highlights their main focus, key/novel concepts, approach/empirical data, main findings/arguments, and suggestions for further research. The diversity of the chapters in these respects is rich, which is perhaps not so surprising, but there are also clear differences between the two groups of chapters representing economics and law. This observation gives reason to reflect over the past and future interaction between these two disciplines in the IP field. The need for pluralism in choice of research problems and methods, as well as the need for disciplinary perspectives complementary to economics and law, is pointed out. At the same time, the advent of the IP era has led to a rapidly growing research agenda, calling for some priorities. The chapter also reflects on some priorities for interdisciplinary research and teaching on the economics and law of intellectual property. The chapter ends with a speculative reflection about the future of the IP system and its interaction with the economic and legal systems.

Keywords

Intellectual Property Intellectual Capital Patent System Legal Realist Inventive Step 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature References

  1. Adams, J.N. and Brownsword, R. (1999), Understanding Law (2nd ed.). London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
  2. Arrow, K.J. (1962), ‘Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention’. In NBER (1962), pp. 609–25.Google Scholar
  3. Babbage, C. (1830), Reflections on the Decline of Science in England, and Some of its Causes. London: B. Fellowes.Google Scholar
  4. Besen, S.M. and L.J. Raskind (1991), ‘An introduction to the law and economics of intellectual property’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheung, S.N.S. (1986), ‘Property Rights and Invention’. In Palmer (1986), pp. 5–18.Google Scholar
  6. Coase, R. (1960), ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, The Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. David, P.A. (1993), ‘Intellectual Property Institutions and the Panda’s Thumb: Patents, Copyrights, and Trade Secrets in Economic Theory and History’. In Wallerstein et al. (eds.), 1993, Ch. 2, pp. 19–61.Google Scholar
  8. Gallini, N. and Scotchmer, S. (2002), ‘Intellectual Property: When is it the Best Incentive System?’. In Jaffe et al. (2002), Ch. 2, pp. 51–77.Google Scholar
  9. Granstrand, O., ed. (1994), Economics of Technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publ.Google Scholar
  10. Granstrand, O. (2004), ‘The Economics and Management of Technology Trade — Towards a pro-licensing era?’, International Journal of Technology Management (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  11. Jaffe, A.B., Lerner, J. and Stern, S., eds. (2002), Innovation Policy and the Economy 2. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Klein, D.B., ed. (1999), What do Economists Contribute? London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lessig, L. (2001), The Future of Ideas. Random House.Google Scholar
  14. McCloskey, D.N. (1998), The Rhetoric of Economics (2nd ed.). University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  15. NBER (1962), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. National Bureau of Economic Research, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Palmer, J., ed. (1986), ‘The Economics of Patents and Copyrights’, Research in Law and Economics, Vol. 8. Greenwich, CT: J AI Press Inc.Google Scholar
  17. Posner, R. (1992), Economic Analysis of Law (4th ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  18. Rawls, J. (1971), A Theory of Justice (rev.ed. 1999). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Rosenberg, N. (1992), ‘Economic experiments’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 1, 181–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Snow, C.P. (1930), The Two Cultures (2nd ed. 1964). London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Strömholm, S. (1985), A Short History of Legal Thinking in the West. Stockholm: Norstedts.Google Scholar
  22. Vandevelde, K.J. (1996), Thinking like a Lawyer, an Introduction to Legal Reasoning. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  23. Vincenti, W. G. (1990), What Engineers Know and How They Know It. The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  24. von Hippel, E. (1988), The Sources of Innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Wallerstein, M.B., Mogee, M.E. and Schoen, R.A. eds. (1993), Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  26. Wright, B.D. (1983), ‘The economics of invention incentives: patents, prizes, and research contracts’, American Economic Review, 73 (4), 691–707.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ove Granstrand
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Industrial Management and EconomicsChalmers University of TechnologyGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations