Parsing and Semantic Opacity

  • Robert Schreuder
  • Cristina Burani
  • R. Harald Baayen
Part of the Neuropsychology and Cognition book series (NPCO, volume 22)

Abstract

The Dutch low-frequency morphologically complex word branding, ‘surf, the rolling and splashing of the waves’ (7 occurrences per million), consists of two high-frequency constituents, brand, ‘fire, to burn’ (111 occurrences per million), and the nominalizing suffix -ing (13330 occurrences per million. Semantically opaque words such as branding pose an interesting challenge for dual route models of morphological processing in word recognition that allow complex words to be recognized by means of both a direct route and a parsing route (Baayen, Dijkstra, Schreuder, 1997; Burani Laudanna, 1992; Frauenfelder & Schreuder, 1992; Laudanna & Burani, 1995; Schreuder & Baayen, 1995).

Keywords

Stimulus Onset Asynchrony Base Word Lexical Processing Complex Word Short Stimulus Onset Asynchrony 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrews, S.: 1986, Morphological influences on lexical access: lexical or non-lexical effects?, Journal of Memory and Language 25, 726–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baayen, R. H.: 1993, On frequency, transparency, and productivity, in G. E. Booij and J. van Marie (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1992, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 181–208.Google Scholar
  3. Baayen, R. H., Burani, C. and Schreuder, R.: 1997, Effects of semantic markedness in the processing of regular nominal singulars and plurals in Italian, in G. E. Booij and J. v. Marie (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1996, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T. and Schreuder, R.: 1997, Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual route model, Journal of Memory and Language 36,94–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R. and Gulikers, L.: 1995, The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM), Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  6. Baayen, R. H., Schreuder, R., De Jong, N. H. and Krott, A.: 2001, Dutch inflection: the rules that prove the exception, in S. Nooteboom, F. Weerman, and F. Wijnen (eds), Storage and computation in the language faculty, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (in press).Google Scholar
  7. Bergman, M. W., Hudson, P. T. W. and Eling, P. A. T.: 1988, How simple complex words can be: Morphological processing and word representation, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 40A, 41–72.Google Scholar
  8. Bertram, R., Baayen, R. H. and Schreuder, R.: 1999, Effects of family size for derived and inflected words, Journal of Memory and Language yy, xx.Google Scholar
  9. Burani, C. and Laudanna, A.: 1992, Units of representation for derived words in the lexicon, in R. Frost and L. Katz (eds), Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 361–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Colve, P., Beauvillain, C. and Segui, J.: 1989, On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect, Journal of Memory and Language 28,1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fleischeuers, M.: 1997, Lexical representations and processing of idiomatic adjective-noun combinations, PhD- Thesis, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  12. Frauenfelder, U. H. and Schreuder, R.: 1992, Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity, in G. E. Booij and J. v. Marie (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1991, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. James, C. T.: 1975, The role of semantic information in lexical decisions, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 104, 130–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marie, J. v.: 1985, On the Paradigmatic Dimension of Morphological Creativity, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  15. Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R. and Older, L.: 1994, Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon, Psychological Review 101, 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Peterson, R. R. and Simpson, G. B.: 1989, Effect of backward priming on word recognition in single-word and sentence context, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15, 1020–1032.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sandra, D.: 1990, On the representation and processing of compound words: automatic access to constituent morphemes does not occur, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 42A, 529–567.Google Scholar
  18. Schreuder, R.: 1990, Lexical processing of verbs with separable particles, Yearbook of Morphology 3, 65–79.Google Scholar
  19. Schreuder, R. and Baayen, R.: 1997, How complex simplex words can be, Journal of Memory and Language 36, 118–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schreuder, R. and Baayen, R. H.: 1994, Prefix-stripping re-revisited, Journal of Memory and Language 33,357–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schreuder, R. and Baayen, R. H.: 1995, Modeling morphological processing, in L. B. Feldman (ed.), Morphological Aspects of Language Processing, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 131–154.Google Scholar
  22. Schreuder, R., Grendel, M., Poulisse, N., Roelofs, A. and Voort, M. v. d.: 1990, Lexical processing, morphological complexity and reading, in D. A. Balotta, G. B. Flores d’Arcais and K. Rayner (eds), Comprehension Processes in Reading, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London.Google Scholar
  23. Taft, M.: 1979, Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect, Memory and Cognition 1, 263–272.Google Scholar
  24. De Vries, J. and de Tollenaere, F.: 1958, Etymologisch Woordenboek. Het Spectrum, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  25. Zwitserlood, P.: 1994, The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds, Language and Cognitive Processes 9, 341–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Schreuder
  • Cristina Burani
  • R. Harald Baayen
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Interfaculty Research Unit for Language and Speech (IWTS)University of Nijmegen & Max Planck Institute for PsycholinguisticsNijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.NijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations